Dialogic Consensus as the Moral Philosophical Basis for Shared Decision-making.
Dialogic consensus
Medical ethics
Moral philosophy
Shared decision-making
Journal
The Linacre quarterly
ISSN: 0024-3639
Titre abrégé: Linacre Q
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985221R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
entrez:
21
5
2020
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
21
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Shared decision-making is important and beneficial for patients. Practically, this requires that we explore the values of the patient and the clinician and then consider available treatment options. The aim is to maximize the good of the patient in the context of their illness. Hence, clinical consultations are situations in which we can, and should, draw upon moral philosophical precepts. One such precept, which can fortify the foundations of shared decision-making, is a process of inclusive, noncoercive, and reflective dialogue, which aims at reaching a consensual decision as to what is best for the patient in their situation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32431405
doi: 10.1177/0024363919841775
pii: 10.1177_0024363919841775
pmc: PMC6699040
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
168-171Informations de copyright
© Catholic Medical Association 2019.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Med J Aust. 2014 Jul 7;201(1):35-9
pubmed: 24999896
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Dec;13(4):571-580
pubmed: 27535798
J Med Philos. 2019 Jan 14;44(1):71-84
pubmed: 30590605