Factors Driving Patient Preferences for Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) Injection Regimen and Injection Device Features: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

DCE adults attributes children conjoint analysis discrete choice experiment treatment regimen

Journal

Patient preference and adherence
ISSN: 1177-889X
Titre abrégé: Patient Prefer Adherence
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101475748

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 19 11 2019
accepted: 03 03 2020
entrez: 21 5 2020
pubmed: 21 5 2020
medline: 21 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The daily injection burden of recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) replacement therapy to treat growth hormone deficiency (GHD) may reduce compliance and limit treatment benefit. Research is needed to evaluate patient preferences for GHD injection regimen and device features. Quantitatively evaluate factors driving preferences for r-hGH injection regimen and device features among pediatric (3-17 years, and caregivers) and adult (≥25 years) patients with GHD using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach. The DCE was part of a broader, cross-sectional observational field study to develop clinical outcome assessments (COAs) that assess the experience of patients taking r-hGH injections. Following ethics approval, discrete choice data were collected through an online questionnaire from consented participants recruited from eight sites in the United States. Participants were presented with 20 choice tasks, each comprising different combinations of two profiles. Participants were then shown the same set of three hypothetical device and injection profiles (ie, storage, preparation, injection type device, maintenance, dose setting, injection schedule) and asked whether they would choose each profile over their current device and schedule. Choice-based conjoint analyses were used to estimate the marginal utilities and values for treatment attributes. Subject preferences were estimated at individual and aggregate levels. Two hundred and twenty-four participants completed the DCE (n=75 adults, n=79 adolescent/caregiver dyads, n=70 child/caregiver dyads). Injection schedule was the strongest predictor of choice for the total sample and each patient group. Less frequent injection schedules were more likely to be chosen by participants. A "ready to use" injection was preferred, with no preference for auto-injector versus needle-free device. Most participants would choose the hypothetical injection devices and less frequent dosing over their current daily administered device schedule. Patients prefer a less frequent injection regimen for treating GHD. Addressing patient preferences may improve compliance, adherence, and ultimately, clinical outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32431492
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S239196
pii: 239196
pmc: PMC7198440
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

781-793

Informations de copyright

© 2020 McNamara et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

MM and HG are employed by Adelphi Research. DTB and AY are employed by Adelphi Values. JL and AP are employed by and own stocks from Pfizer. HW was employed by Adelphi Research at the time that the study was conducted and is now retired. A Pleil is an independent research and evaluation consultant who was employed by Pfizer at the time of the research and owns stocks from Pfizer. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Références

Endocr Pract. 2008 Mar;14(2):143-54
pubmed: 18308651
Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 Sep;167(3):343-51
pubmed: 22711759
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Jun;12(3):219-30
pubmed: 20224930
Endocr Pract. 2009 Sep-Oct;15 Suppl 2:1-29
pubmed: 20228036
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):e267-e274
pubmed: 29726391
Endocr Connect. 2018 Aug;7(8):914-923
pubmed: 29976785
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017 Dec 11;8:346
pubmed: 29312142
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 31;6(1):e16223
pubmed: 21305004
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Mar;24(2):151-8
pubmed: 19112071
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 May;99(5):548-54
pubmed: 26715217
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13
pubmed: 23337210
Eur J Endocrinol. 2005 Feb;152(2):165-70
pubmed: 15745921
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2019 Jul 02;:
pubmed: 31266067
Front Pediatr. 2019 Apr 29;7:164
pubmed: 31111024
Value Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;8(4):453-61
pubmed: 16091022

Auteurs

Michelle McNamara (M)

Adelphi Research, Doylestown, PA, USA.

Hal Westhead (H)

Adelphi Research, Manchester, UK.

Andrew Yaworsky (A)

Adelphi Values, Boston, MA, USA.

Andrew Palladino (A)

Pfizer, Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA.

Hillary Gross (H)

Adelphi Research, Doylestown, PA, USA.

Andy Pleil (A)

Endpoints and Evidence, LLC, Surf City, NC, USA.

Jane Loftus (J)

Pfizer Ltd., Tadworth, UK.

Classifications MeSH