Deep Learning-Based HCS Image Analysis for the Enterprise.
cell-based assays
high-content screening
image analysis
imaging technologies
phenotypic drug discovery
Journal
SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D
ISSN: 2472-5560
Titre abrégé: SLAS Discov
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101697563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
16
7
2021
entrez:
21
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Drug discovery programs are moving increasingly toward phenotypic imaging assays to model disease-relevant pathways and phenotypes in vitro. These assays offer richer information than target-optimized assays by investigating multiple cellular pathways simultaneously and producing multiplexed readouts. However, extracting the desired information from complex image data poses significant challenges, preventing broad adoption of more sophisticated phenotypic assays. Deep learning-based image analysis can address these challenges by reducing the effort required to analyze large volumes of complex image data at a quality and speed adequate for routine phenotypic screening in pharmaceutical research. However, while general purpose deep learning frameworks are readily available, they are not readily applicable to images from automated microscopy. During the past 3 years, we have optimized deep learning networks for this type of data and validated the approach across diverse assays with several industry partners. From this work, we have extracted five essential design principles that we believe should guide deep learning-based analysis of high-content images and multiparameter data: (1) insightful data representation, (2) automation of training, (3) multilevel quality control, (4) knowledge embedding and transfer to new assays, and (5) enterprise integration. We report a new deep learning-based software that embodies these principles, Genedata Imagence, which allows screening scientists to reliably detect stable endpoints for primary drug response, assess toxicity and safety-relevant effects, and discover new phenotypes and compound classes. Furthermore, we show how the software retains expert knowledge from its training on a particular assay and successfully reapplies it to different, novel assays in an automated fashion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32432952
doi: 10.1177/2472555220918837
pmc: PMC7372584
pii: S2472-5552(22)06608-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
812-821Références
Nat Protoc. 2016 Sep;11(9):1757-74
pubmed: 27560178
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 May 5;7(5):1385-1392
pubmed: 28391243
ACS Med Chem Lett. 2013 Jul 20;4(9):846-851
pubmed: 24611085
Stem Cells. 2018 Sep;36(9):1329-1340
pubmed: 29770526
Mol Syst Biol. 2017 Apr 18;13(4):924
pubmed: 28420678
Lab Chip. 2019 Jan 29;19(3):410-421
pubmed: 30663729
Cytometry A. 2019 Apr;95(4):366-380
pubmed: 30565841
Drug Res (Stuttg). 2018 Jun;68(6):305-310
pubmed: 29341027
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 02;8(12):e80999
pubmed: 24312513
Trends Cell Biol. 2016 Aug;26(8):598-611
pubmed: 27118708
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011 Jun 24;10(7):507-19
pubmed: 21701501
SLAS Discov. 2019 Apr;24(4):466-475
pubmed: 30641024
J Biomol Screen. 2016 Oct;21(9):998-1003
pubmed: 26950929
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Nov 7;28(23):3428-3436
pubmed: 28954863
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Nov 05;10:1303
pubmed: 31749705
Genome Biol. 2006;7(10):R100
pubmed: 17076895
Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 1;33(13):2010-2019
pubmed: 28203779