Global high-resolution emissions of soil NO


Journal

Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 05 2020
Historique:
received: 31 10 2019
accepted: 16 04 2020
entrez: 21 5 2020
pubmed: 21 5 2020
medline: 21 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Natural emissions of air pollutants from the surface play major roles in air quality and climate change. In particular, nitrogen oxides (NO

Identifiants

pubmed: 32433468
doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0488-5
pii: 10.1038/s41597-020-0488-5
pmc: PMC7239948
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

148

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 41775115
Pays : International
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 41775115
Pays : International

Références

Holland, E. A., Dentener, F. J., Braswell, B. H. & Sulzman, J. M. Contemporary and pre-industrial global reactive nitrogen budgets. Biogeochemistry 46, 7–43, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006148011944 (1999).
doi: 10.1023/A:1006148011944
Hudman, R. C. et al. Steps towards a mechanistic model of global soil nitric oxide emissions: implementation and space based-constraints. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 7779–7795, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7779-2012 (2012).
doi: 10.5194/acp-12-7779-2012
Vinken, G. C. M., Boersma, K. F., Maasakkers, J. D., Adon, M. & Martin, R. V. Worldwide biogenic soil NO
doi: 10.5194/acp-14-10363-2014
Haywood, J. M., Ramaswamy, V. & Soden, B. J. Tropospheric Aerosol Climate Forcing in Clear-Sky Satellite Observations over the Oceans. Science 283, 1299–1303, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5406.1299 (1999).
doi: 10.1126/science.283.5406.1299 pubmed: 10037595
Ma, X., Von Salzen, K. & Li, J. Modelling sea salt aerosol and its direct and indirect effects on climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 1311–1327 (2008).
doi: 10.5194/acp-8-1311-2008
Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B. & Lin, J. T. Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and remote sensing observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 3137–3157, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011 (2011).
doi: 10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011
Sievering, H. et al. Removal of sulphur from the marine boundary layer by ozone oxidation in sea-salt aerosols. Nature 360, 571–573, https://doi.org/10.1038/360571a0 (1992).
doi: 10.1038/360571a0
Vogt, R., Sander, R., von Glasow, R. & Crutzen, P. J. Iodine Chemistry and its Role in Halogen Activation and Ozone Loss in the Marine Boundary Layer: A Model Study. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 32, 375–395, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006179901037 (1999).
doi: 10.1023/A:1006179901037
Yang, X. et al. Tropospheric bromine chemistry and its impacts on ozone: A model study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 110, D23311,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006244 (2005).
Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J. & Yang, X. Global lifetime of elemental mercury against oxidation by atomic bromine in the free troposphere. Geophysical Research Letters 33, L20808,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl027176 (2006).
Read, K. A. et al. Extensive halogen-mediated ozone destruction over the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Nature 453, 1232–1235, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07035 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nature07035 pubmed: 18580948
Zhu, L. et al. Effect of sea salt aerosol on tropospheric bromine chemistry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 6497–6507, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6497-2019 (2019).
doi: 10.5194/acp-19-6497-2019
Lamarque, J. F. et al. Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 7017–7039, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010 (2010).
doi: 10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010
Guenther, A. B. et al. The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model Dev. 5, 1471–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012 (2012).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012
Sindelarova, K. et al. Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 9317–9341, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014 (2014).
doi: 10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014
Pfister, G. G. et al. Contribution of isoprene to chemical budgets: A model tracer study with the NCAR CTM MOZART-4. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 113, D05308,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008948 (2008).
Bauwens, M. et al. Nine years of global hydrocarbon emissions based on source inversion of OMI formaldehyde observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 10133–10158, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10133-2016 (2016).
doi: 10.5194/acp-16-10133-2016
Houweling, S., Dentener, F. & Lelieveld, J. The impact of nonmethane hydrocarbon compounds on tropospheric photochemistry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 103, 10673–10696, https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd03582 (1998).
doi: 10.1029/97jd03582
Taraborrelli, D. et al. Hydroxyl radical buffered by isoprene oxidation over tropical forests. Nature Geoscience 5, 190–193, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1405 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/ngeo1405
Granier, C., Pétron, G., Müller, J.-F. & Brasseur, G. The impact of natural and anthropogenic hydrocarbons on the tropospheric budget of carbon monoxide. Atmospheric Environment 34, 5255–5270, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00299-5 (2000).
doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00299-5
Meixner, F. X. & Yang, W. X. In Dryland Ecohydrology (eds Paolo D’Odorico & Amilcare Porporato) 233–255 (Springer Netherlands, 2006).
Hudman, R. C., Russell, A. R., Valin, L. C. & Cohen, R. C. Interannual variability in soil nitric oxide emissions over the United States as viewed from space. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 9943–9952, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9943-2010 (2010).
doi: 10.5194/acp-10-9943-2010
Lin, J. T. Satellite constraint for emissions of nitrogen oxides from anthropogenic, lightning and soil sources over East China on a high-resolution grid. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 2881–2898, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2881-2012 (2012).
doi: 10.5194/acp-12-2881-2012
Yan, Y. Y., Lin, J. T., Kuang, Y., Yang, D. & Zhang, L. Tropospheric carbon monoxide over the Pacific during HIPPO: two-way coupled simulation of GEOS-Chem and its multiple nested models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 12649–12663, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12649-2014 (2014).
doi: 10.5194/acp-14-12649-2014
Yan, Y., Lin, J., Chen, J. & Hu, L. Improved simulation of tropospheric ozone by a global-multi-regional two-way coupling model system. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 2381–2400, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2381-2016 (2016).
doi: 10.5194/acp-16-2381-2016
Yu, K. et al. Sensitivity to grid resolution in the ability of a chemical transport model to simulate observed oxidant chemistry under high-isoprene conditions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 4369–4378, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4369-2016 (2016).
doi: 10.5194/acp-16-4369-2016
Monks, P. S. et al. Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 8889–8973, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015 (2015).
doi: 10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015
Keller, C. A. et al. HEMCO v1.0: a versatile, ESMF-compliant component for calculating emissions in atmospheric models. Geosci. Model Dev. 7, 1409–1417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014 (2014).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014
Hongjian, W. & Jintai, L. Global high-resolution emissions of soil NOx, sea salt aerosols, and biogenic VOCs. figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9962216.v4 (2020).
Steinkamp, J. & Lawrence, M. G. Improvement and evaluation of simulated global biogenic soil NO emissions in an AC-GCM. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 6063–6082, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6063-2011 (2011).
doi: 10.5194/acp-11-6063-2011
Cheng, W., Tsuruta, H., Chen, G. & Yagi, K. N2O and NO production in various Chinese agricultural soils by nitrification. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36, 953–963, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.012 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.012
Russell, C. A., Dunn, B. W., Batten, G. D., Williams, R. L. & Angus, J. F. Soil tests to predict optimum fertilizer nitrogen rate for rice. Field Crops Research 97, 286–301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.10.007 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.10.007
Linn, D. M. & Doran, J. W. Effect of Water-Filled Pore Space on Carbon Dioxide and Nitrous Oxide Production in Tilled and Nontilled Soils1. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 1267–1272, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800060013x (1984).
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800060013x
Yan, X., Ohara, T. & Akimoto, H. Statistical modeling of global soil NOx emissions. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 19, GB3019 (2005).
Johansson, C. & Sanhueza, E. Emission of NO from savanna soils during rainy season. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 93, 14193 (1988).
doi: 10.1029/JD093iD11p14193
Davidson, E. A. Pulses of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide flux following wetting of dry soil: An assessment of probable sources and importance relative to annual fluxes. Ecological Bulletins 42, 149–155 (1992).
Martin, R. E. et al. Controls on annual emissions of nitric oxide from soils of the Colorado shortgrass steppe. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 12, 81–91 (1998).
doi: 10.1029/97GB03501
Scholes, M., Martin, R., Scholes, R., Parsons, D. & Winstead, E. NO and N2O emissions from savanna soils following the first simulated rains of the season. Nutrient cycling in Agroecosystems 48, 115–122 (1997).
doi: 10.1023/A:1009781420199
Gong, S. L. A parameterization of sea-salt aerosol source function for sub- and super-micron particles. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002079 (2003).
Yuan, H., Dai, Y., Xiao, Z., Ji, D. & Shangguan, W. Reprocessing the MODIS Leaf Area Index products for land surface and climate modelling. Remote Sensing of Environment 115, 1171–1187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.01.001 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.01.001
Ashworth, K., Wild, O. & Hewitt, C. N. Sensitivity of isoprene emissions estimated using MEGAN to the time resolution of input climate data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 1193–1201, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1193-2010 (2010).
doi: 10.5194/acp-10-1193-2010
Wang, Y., Jacob, D. J. & Logan, J. A. Global simulation of tropospheric O3-NO x -hydrocarbon chemistry: 1. Model formulation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 103, 10713–10725, https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd00158 (1998).
doi: 10.1029/98jd00158
Yienger, J. J. & Levy, H. II Empirical model of global soil-biogenic NOχ emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 100, 11447–11464, https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd00370 (1995).
doi: 10.1029/95jd00370
Boucher, O. et al. In Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 571–657 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Arneth, A. et al. Global terrestrial isoprene emission models: sensitivity to variability in climate and vegetation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 8037–8052, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8037-2011 (2011).
doi: 10.5194/acp-11-8037-2011
Shim, C. et al. Constraining global isoprene emissions with Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) formaldehyde column measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 110,D24301 (2005).
Miyazaki, K. et al. Decadal changes in global surface NO x emissions from multi-constituent satellite data assimilation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 807–837 (2017).
Stavrakou, T. et al. Key chemical NOx sink uncertainties and how they influence top-down emissions of nitrogen oxides. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 9057–9082 (2013).
doi: 10.5194/acp-13-9057-2013
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J. F., Boersma, K. F., De Smedt, I. & Van Der A, R. Assessing the distribution and growth rates of NOx emission sources by inverting a 10-year record of NO2 satellite columns. Geophysical Research Letters 35, L10801 (2008).
Jaeglé, L., Steinberger, L., Martin, R. V. & Chance, K. Global partitioning of NO x sources using satellite observations: Relative roles of fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning and soil emissions. Faraday discussions 130, 407–423 (2005).
doi: 10.1039/b502128f
Müller, J.-F. & Stavrakou, T. Inversion of CO and NOx emissions using the adjoint of the IMAGES model. Atmos. Chem. Phys 5, 1157–1186 (2005).
doi: 10.5194/acp-5-1157-2005
Heald, C. L., Geddes, J. A. & Unger, N. The impact of historical land use change from 1850 to 2000 on secondary particulate matter and ozone. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16,14997–15010 (2016).
Ganzeveld, L. et al. Global soil‐biogenic NOx emissions and the role of canopy processes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 107(ACH 9-1-ACH), 9–17 (2002).
Müller, J. F. Geographical distribution and seasonal variation of surface emissions and deposition velocities of atmospheric trace gases. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 97, 3787–3804 (1992).
doi: 10.1029/91JD02757
Grythe, H., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Quinn, P. & Stohl, A. A review of sea-spray aerosol source functions using a large global set of sea salt aerosol concentration measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 1277–1297 (2014).
doi: 10.5194/acp-14-1277-2014
Sofiev, M., Soares, J., Prank, M., de Leeuw, G. & Kukkonen, J. A regional-to-global model of emission and transport of sea salt particles in the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 116, D21302 (2011).
Henrot, A.-J. et al. Implementation of the MEGAN (v2. 1) biogenic emission model in the ECHAM6-HAMMOZ chemistry climate model. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 903–926 (2017).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-903-2017
Messina, P. et al. Global biogenic volatile organic compound emissions in the ORCHIDEE and MEGAN models and sensitivity to key parameters. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 14169–14169 (2016).
doi: 10.5194/acp-16-14169-2016
Emmons, L. K. et al. Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4). Geosci. Model Dev. 3, 43–67 (2010).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010
Young, P. J., Arneth, A., Schurgers, G., Zeng, G. & Pyle, J. A. The CO
doi: 10.5194/acp-9-2793-2009
Müller, J. F. et al. Global isoprene emissions estimated using MEGAN, ECMWF analyses and a detailed canopy environment model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 1329–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1329-2008 (2008).
doi: 10.5194/acp-8-1329-2008
Wiedinmyer, C., Tie, X., Guenther, A., Neilson, R. & Granier, C. Future changes in biogenic isoprene emissions: how might they affect regional and global atmospheric chemistry? Earth Interactions 10, 1–19 (2006).
doi: 10.1175/EI174.1
Guenther, A. et al. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 3181–3210 (2006).
doi: 10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006
Naik, V., Delire, C. & Wuebbles, D. J. Sensitivity of global biogenic isoprenoid emissions to climate variability and atmospheric CO2. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 109, D06301 (2004).
Levis, S., Wiedinmyer, C., Bonan, G. B. & Guenther, A. Simulating biogenic volatile organic compound emissions in the Community Climate System Model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 108, D21, 4659 (2003).
Guenther, A. et al. A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 100, 8873–8892 (1995).
doi: 10.1029/94JD02950

Auteurs

Hongjian Weng (H)

Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Jintai Lin (J)

Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China. linjt@pku.edu.cn.

Randall Martin (R)

Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, 63130, MO, USA.

Dylan B Millet (DB)

Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St Paul, MN, 55455, USA.

Lyatt Jaeglé (L)

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

David Ridley (D)

Department of Civil and Environmental, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

Christoph Keller (C)

Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA.

Chi Li (C)

Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.

Mingxi Du (M)

Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Jun Meng (J)

Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, 63130, MO, USA.

Classifications MeSH