Late pregnancy screening for preeclampsia with a urinary point-of-care test for misfolded proteins.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
22
01
2020
accepted:
17
04
2020
entrez:
21
5
2020
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
4
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim was to describe and assess a new late pregnancy point-of-care urinary preeclampsia screening test. Urine samples were collected from a consecutive series of 1,532 pregnant women hospitalized at 20-41 weeks gestation in a Chinese single obstetric unit. A simple disposable Congo red based device was newly developed and employed to prospectively test misfolded proteins in pregnant women's urine. A total of 140 preeclampsia cases were clinically diagnosed, 101 severe and 87 pre-term. Detection and false positive rates were similar in the training and validation subsets with combined 74% and 3.0%. The detection rate was 83% in severe, 86% in pre-term, 49% and 50% in mild and term cases (P<0.0001) respectively. In conclusion, a simple point-of-care urinary test for misfolded proteins can be used to screen for preeclampsia in late pregnancy with very high screening performance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to screen for preeclampsia using Congo red based device in Chinese pregnant population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32433710
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233214
pii: PONE-D-20-01882
pmc: PMC7239432
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0233214Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: X.Li and J.X. are employed by Shuwen Biotech, which manufactures the CapCord test described and evaluated in this paper. H.C. is a paid consultant of PerkinElmer Life Science which has a commercial partnership with Shuwen Biotech. X.Liu and J.D. have no competing interests to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):464.e1-7
pubmed: 27133010
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):126.e1-126.e13
pubmed: 29097177
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145 Suppl 1:1-33
pubmed: 31111484
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 4;9(7):e029908
pubmed: 31278106
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Jul;13:83-86
pubmed: 30177078
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):492-495
pubmed: 28741785
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;199(5):551.e1-16
pubmed: 18984079
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Mar 01;8:47-56
pubmed: 31193633
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1122-31
pubmed: 24150027
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Jul;23(7):622-6
pubmed: 20482241
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):13-22
pubmed: 26735990
Semin Perinatol. 2009 Jun;33(3):130-7
pubmed: 19464502
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Jul 16;6(245):245ra92
pubmed: 25031267
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;27(6):647-51
pubmed: 16652407
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;41(1):23-31
pubmed: 26930075
J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Feb;24(2):104-10
pubmed: 19516271