Randomized Comparison of the Polymer-Free Biolimus-Coated BioFreedom Stent With the Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Orsiro Stent in an All-Comers Population Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT IX Trial.


Journal

Circulation
ISSN: 1524-4539
Titre abrégé: Circulation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0147763

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 22 5 2020
medline: 31 8 2021
entrez: 22 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In patients with increased bleeding risk, the biolimus A9-coated BioFreedom stent, a stainless steel drug-coated stent free from polymer, has shown superiority compared with a bare-metal stent. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the BioFreedom stent is noninferior to a modern ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent in an all-comers patient population treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. The SORT OUT IX trial (Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome IX), was a large-scale, registry-based, randomized, multicenter, single-blind, 2-arm, noninferiority trial. The primary end point, major adverse cardiovascular events, was defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not related to any segment other than the target lesion, or target lesion revascularization within 1 year, analyzed by intention-to-treat. The trial was powered to assess noninferiority for major adverse cardiovascular events of the BioFreedom stent compared with the Orsiro stent with a predetermined noninferiority margin of 0.021. Between December 14, 2015 and April 21, 2017, 3151 patients were assigned to treatment with the BioFreedom stent (1572 patients, 1966 lesions) or to the Orsiro stent (1579 patients, 1985 lesions). Five patients were lost to follow-up because of emigration (99.9% follow-up rate). Mean age was 66.3±10.9, diabetes mellitus was seen in 19.3% of patients, and 53% of the patients had acute coronary syndromes. At 1 year, intention-to-treat analysis showed that 79 (5.0%) patients, who were assigned the BioFreedom stent, and 59 (3.7%), who were assigned the Orsiro stent, met the primary end point (absolute risk difference 1.29% [upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 2.50%]; The biolimus A9-coated BioFreedom polymer-free stent did not meet criteria for noninferiority for major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months when compared with the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent in an all-comers population Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02623140.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In patients with increased bleeding risk, the biolimus A9-coated BioFreedom stent, a stainless steel drug-coated stent free from polymer, has shown superiority compared with a bare-metal stent. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the BioFreedom stent is noninferior to a modern ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent in an all-comers patient population treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.
METHODS
The SORT OUT IX trial (Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome IX), was a large-scale, registry-based, randomized, multicenter, single-blind, 2-arm, noninferiority trial. The primary end point, major adverse cardiovascular events, was defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not related to any segment other than the target lesion, or target lesion revascularization within 1 year, analyzed by intention-to-treat. The trial was powered to assess noninferiority for major adverse cardiovascular events of the BioFreedom stent compared with the Orsiro stent with a predetermined noninferiority margin of 0.021.
RESULTS
Between December 14, 2015 and April 21, 2017, 3151 patients were assigned to treatment with the BioFreedom stent (1572 patients, 1966 lesions) or to the Orsiro stent (1579 patients, 1985 lesions). Five patients were lost to follow-up because of emigration (99.9% follow-up rate). Mean age was 66.3±10.9, diabetes mellitus was seen in 19.3% of patients, and 53% of the patients had acute coronary syndromes. At 1 year, intention-to-treat analysis showed that 79 (5.0%) patients, who were assigned the BioFreedom stent, and 59 (3.7%), who were assigned the Orsiro stent, met the primary end point (absolute risk difference 1.29% [upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 2.50%];
CONCLUSIONS
The biolimus A9-coated BioFreedom polymer-free stent did not meet criteria for noninferiority for major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months when compared with the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent in an all-comers population Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02623140.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32434381
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040241
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Inflammatory Agents 0
Polymers 0
umirolimus U36PGF65JH
Sirolimus W36ZG6FT64

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02623140']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2052-2063

Investigateurs

Kristian Thygesen (K)
Jacob Thorsted Sørensen (JT)
Henning Rud Andersen (HR)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Lisette Okkels Jensen (Lisette Okkels)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., J.E., K.T.V., O.A., K.N.H., A.A., A.J., J.F.L., H.S.H.).

Michael Maeng (M)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Denmark (M.M., L.J., S.D.K., S.C., C.J.T., H.E.B., T.T., A.E., E.H.C.).

Bent Raungaard (B)

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (B.R., A.B.V., M.K.C., J.A., L.T., P.F., S.E.J.).

Johnny Kahlert (J)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Denmark (J.K.).

Julia Ellert (J)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., J.E., K.T.V., O.A., K.N.H., A.A., A.J., J.F.L., H.S.H.).

Lars Jakobsen (L)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Denmark (M.M., L.J., S.D.K., S.C., C.J.T., H.E.B., T.T., A.E., E.H.C.).

Anton Boel Villadsen (AB)

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (B.R., A.B.V., M.K.C., J.A., L.T., P.F., S.E.J.).

Karsten Tange Veien (KT)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., J.E., K.T.V., O.A., K.N.H., A.A., A.J., J.F.L., H.S.H.).

Steen Dalby Kristensen (SD)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Denmark (M.M., L.J., S.D.K., S.C., C.J.T., H.E.B., T.T., A.E., E.H.C.).

Ole Ahlehoff (O)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., J.E., K.T.V., O.A., K.N.H., A.A., A.J., J.F.L., H.S.H.).

Steen Carstensen (S)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Denmark (M.M., L.J., S.D.K., S.C., C.J.T., H.E.B., T.T., A.E., E.H.C.).

Martin Kirk Christensen (MK)

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (B.R., A.B.V., M.K.C., J.A., L.T., P.F., S.E.J.).

Christian Juhl Terkelsen (CJ)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Denmark (M.M., L.J., S.D.K., S.C., C.J.T., H.E.B., T.T., A.E., E.H.C.).

Knud Nørregaard Hansen (KN)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., J.E., K.T.V., O.A., K.N.H., A.A., A.J., J.F.L., H.S.H.).

Hans Erik Bøtker (HE)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Denmark (M.M., L.J., S.D.K., S.C., C.J.T., H.E.B., T.T., A.E., E.H.C.).

Jens Aaroe (J)

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (B.R., A.B.V., M.K.C., J.A., L.T., P.F., S.E.J.).

Troels Thim (T)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Denmark (M.M., L.J., S.D.K., S.C., C.J.T., H.E.B., T.T., A.E., E.H.C.).

Leif Thuesen (L)

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (B.R., A.B.V., M.K.C., J.A., L.T., P.F., S.E.J.).

Philip Freeman (P)

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (B.R., A.B.V., M.K.C., J.A., L.T., P.F., S.E.J.).

Ahmed Aziz (A)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., J.E., K.T.V., O.A., K.N.H., A.A., A.J., J.F.L., H.S.H.).

Ashkan Eftekhari (A)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Denmark (M.M., L.J., S.D.K., S.C., C.J.T., H.E.B., T.T., A.E., E.H.C.).

Anders Junker (A)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., J.E., K.T.V., O.A., K.N.H., A.A., A.J., J.F.L., H.S.H.).

Svend Eggert Jensen (SE)

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (B.R., A.B.V., M.K.C., J.A., L.T., P.F., S.E.J.).

Jens Flensted Lassen (JF)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., J.E., K.T.V., O.A., K.N.H., A.A., A.J., J.F.L., H.S.H.).
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (J.F.L.).

Henrik Steen Hansen (HS)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., J.E., K.T.V., O.A., K.N.H., A.A., A.J., J.F.L., H.S.H.).

Evald Høj Christiansen (EH)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Denmark (M.M., L.J., S.D.K., S.C., C.J.T., H.E.B., T.T., A.E., E.H.C.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH