Indoor Air Quality and Sick Building Syndrome: Are Green Buildings Better than Conventional Buildings?

Conventional buildings green buildings indoor air quality sick building syndrome

Journal

Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine
ISSN: 0973-2284
Titre abrégé: Indian J Occup Environ Med
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9815775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 19 06 2019
revised: 01 10 2019
accepted: 12 01 2020
entrez: 22 5 2020
pubmed: 22 5 2020
medline: 22 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Indoor air quality (IAQ) influences human health, productivity and wellness. Green buildings are believed to have better IAQ. The 'sick building syndrome' (SBS) describes a set of nonspecific symptoms experienced by occupants due to time spent in a building with poor IAQ. Thus this study was undertaken to assess the IAQ in green buildings and compare it with that of conventional buildings. The prevalence of SBS in both types of buildings is also studied. In five pairs of green and conventional buildings measurements of comfort parameters (temperature & relative humidity) and indoor air pollutants using monitors was done. 148 employees which included 84 from green buildings and 64 from conventional buildings were surveyed for SBS using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The analysis was done using SPSS16 and included Mann Whitney for IAQ pollutant concentrations and Chi-square for the SBS prevalence. Similar indoor air quality was found in both types of buildings. The mean of temperature, CO2 and formaldehyde was statistically lower in green buildings. The SBS prevalence was found to be 38.1% in green buildings and 53.1% in conventional buildings. Thus to conclude the poorly maintained green building does not have any added advantage for occurrence of SBS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32435112
doi: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_148_19
pii: IJOEM-24-30
pmc: PMC7227732
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

30-32

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

Indoor Air. 2002 Dec;12(4):235-42
pubmed: 12532755
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Apr;24(12):11166-11176
pubmed: 28236201
Environ Res. 2019 Mar;170:83-91
pubmed: 30576993
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Sep 20;684:434-444
pubmed: 31154216
Chem Rev. 2010 Apr 14;110(4):2536-72
pubmed: 20067232
Indoor Air. 2005 Dec;15(6):432-44
pubmed: 16268833
Med Lav. 2018 Dec 20;109(6):435-443
pubmed: 30556534

Auteurs

Sonal Gawande (S)

Department of Public Health, Manipal University, Madhav Nagar, Near Tiger Circle, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Rajnarayan R Tiwari (RR)

ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, KNH Building, GMC Campus, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Prakash Narayanan (P)

Department of Public Health, Manipal University, Madhav Nagar, Near Tiger Circle, Manipal, Karnatakaa, India.

Ashwin Bhadri (A)

Department of Research, Equinox Labs, ThaneBelapur Rd, Sector 8, MIDC Industrial Area, Rabale, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Classifications MeSH