Standardized Quantification of Vagal Denervation by Extracardiac Vagal Stimulation during Second Generation Cryoballoon ablation: a Vein per Vein Analysis.
Atrial Fibrillation
Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System
Ganglionated Plexi
Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Second-Generation Cryoballoon
Vagal Stimulation
Journal
Journal of atrial fibrillation
ISSN: 1941-6911
Titre abrégé: J Atr Fibrillation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101514767
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
20
08
2019
revised:
14
09
2019
accepted:
26
09
2019
entrez:
22
5
2020
pubmed:
22
5
2020
medline:
22
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution in the acute loss in vagal innervation after ablation with the second generation cryoballoon (CB-A) in each distinct pulmonary vein (PV) by means of external cardiac vagal stimulation (ECVS) by positioning a catheter in the internal jugular vein in a cohort of 60 patients. Sixty patients, 50 starting from the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) and 10 from the right superior pulmonary vein with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), having undergone ECVS before the first and after each PV ablation by means of CB-A ablation, were included. The ECVS performed pre-ablation provoked cardioinhibitory responses in all cases with mean pause duration of 10251.83 ms ± 2826.23 ms. At the end of the procedure, the vagal reactions (VR) were significantly diminished. Specifically, compared against the initial pause, responses were 8957.06 ± 2711.66 ms (p < 0.01) after left superior PV, 10017.36 ± 9127.0 ms (p = 0.88) after left inferior PV, 6020.16 ± 3780.709 ms (p < 0.001) after right inferior PV and 1687.5 ± 2183.7 ms (p < 0.001) after right superior PV. Noteworthy, if starting with ablation in the RSPV, VR was immediately reduced by 90.34%, 990.7 ± 379.78 ms (p < 0.001) as compared to baseline response. Although not directly targeting the ganglion plexuses, AF ablation with the CB-A causes a significant acute loss in parasympathetic innervation. The RSPV showed to be associated with the most significant reduction of acute loss in parasympathetic innervation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32435337
doi: 10.4022/jafib.2223
pmc: PMC7237095
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2223Références
Heart Rhythm. 2011 May;8(5):672-8
pubmed: 21199686
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):283-90
pubmed: 25460865
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2019 Mar;20(3):107-113
pubmed: 30664072
Circulation. 1997 Jun 3;95(11):2573-84
pubmed: 9184589
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004 Aug;287(2):R262-71
pubmed: 15271675
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1986 May-Jun;16(3):198-208
pubmed: 2872849
Europace. 2004 Nov;6(6):590-601
pubmed: 15519263
Europace. 2011 Sep;13(9):1231-42
pubmed: 21712276
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 1;258:115-120
pubmed: 29467097
Heart Rhythm. 2005 May;2(5):518-22
pubmed: 15840477
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):850-9
pubmed: 22895601
Am J Med Sci. 2018 Mar;355(3):252-265
pubmed: 29549928
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Jan;39(1):42-53
pubmed: 26411271
Europace. 2005 Jan;7(1):1-13
pubmed: 15670960
Heart Rhythm. 2016 May;13(5):1010-1017
pubmed: 26711797
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jan 28;63(3):215-24
pubmed: 24140663
Circulation. 1991 Apr;83(4):1210-20
pubmed: 2013143
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;4(6):831-838
pubmed: 29929678
Europace. 2014 May;16(5):645-51
pubmed: 23954919
Heart Rhythm. 2009 Dec;6(12 Suppl):S26-34
pubmed: 19959140
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66
pubmed: 9725923
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Aug;55(2):191-196
pubmed: 30734138
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jul 4;48(1):132-43
pubmed: 16814659