Comparison of Pulmonary Function After Selective Anterior Versus Posterior Fusion for the Correction of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
pulmonary function
selective fusion
thoracolumbar and lumbar curve
Journal
Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez:
22
5
2020
pubmed:
22
5
2020
medline:
22
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Retrospective multicenter study. To compare the selective anterior spinal fusion (ASF) versus posterior spinal fusion (PSF) on postoperative pulmonary function testing (PFT) whether thoracotomy with separation of the diaphragm by anterior approach influences the PFT in thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). A multicenter series of AIS patients who underwent selective spinal fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-nine female patients were included (mean 15.8 years). There were 35 patients in the ASF group and 44 patients in the PSF group. Patient demographics, radiographic measurements, and PFT data from preoperative to 2-year follow-up were analyzed. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in PFTs between the groups. The ASF group patients were more likely to undergo shorter fusions (4.5 instrumented vertebral levels) than those in the PSF group (5.2 levels). At 2-year follow-up, forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV Pulmonary function after ASF and PSF was similar at 2 years; however, anterior group did not return to the baseline at 6 months and 1 year suggesting anterior approach may affect early postoperative pulmonary function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32435563
doi: 10.1177/2192568219859573
pii: 10.1177_2192568219859573
pmc: PMC7222688
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
433-437Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1058-63
pubmed: 15864159
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 1;29(3):269-76; discussion 276
pubmed: 14752348
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Sep;120(3):625-95
pubmed: 384853
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Nov 15;20(22):2415-20
pubmed: 8578392
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 1;33(10):1055-60
pubmed: 18449037
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Aug 15;42(16):1241-1247
pubmed: 28800571
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Oct;13(10):1145-9
pubmed: 3206273
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 1;32(17):1875-82
pubmed: 17762296
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jan;25(1):82-90
pubmed: 10647165
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1942-51
pubmed: 19680102
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):1937-46
pubmed: 16140807
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1534-41
pubmed: 15995121
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 May;14(5):486-90
pubmed: 2727795
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969 Jan-Feb;62:192-202
pubmed: 5774835
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Aug;148(2):288-94
pubmed: 8342890
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Feb;64(2):242-8
pubmed: 7056779
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Jun;63(5):702-12
pubmed: 6453874
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Mar 15;18(4):417-22
pubmed: 8469999
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jun;17(6):708-13
pubmed: 1626305
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Mar;9(2):220-2
pubmed: 6729583
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 May 15;21(10):1250-61; discussion 1261-2
pubmed: 8727201
Orthop Clin North Am. 1979 Oct;10(4):801-12
pubmed: 523082
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Apr 17;95(8):e49
pubmed: 23595075