Evaluation of an organ-based tube current modulation tool in pediatric CT examinations.
Anthropometry
Breast
/ diagnostic imaging
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Head
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Monte Carlo Method
Phantoms, Imaging
Physical Examination
Radiation Dosage
Thorax
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Child
Monte Carlo method
Radiation dosage
Radiation protection
Tomography, x-ray computed
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
22
11
2019
accepted:
10
04
2020
revised:
16
03
2020
pubmed:
22
5
2020
medline:
10
2
2021
entrez:
22
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the effect of an organ-based tube current modulation (OTCM) technique on organ absorbed dose and assess image quality in pediatric CT examinations. Four physical anthropomorphic phantoms that represent the average individual as neonate, 1-year-old, 5-year-old, and 10-year-old were used. Standard head and thorax acquisitions were performed with automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) and ATCM+OTCM. Dose calculations were performed by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Radiation dose was measured for superficial and centrally located radiosensitive organs. The angular range of the OTCM exposure window was determined for different tube rotation times (t) by means of a solid-state detector. Image noise was measured as the standard deviation of the Hounsfield unit value in regions of interest drawn at selected anatomical sites. ATCM+OTCM resulted in a reduction of radiation dose to all radiosensitive organs. In head, eye lens dose was reduced by up to 13% in ATCM+OTCM compared with ATCM. In thorax, the corresponding reduction for breast dose was up to 10%. The angular range of the OTCM exposure window decreased with t. For t = 0.4 s, the angular range was limited to 74° in head and 135° for thorax. Image noise was significantly increased in ATCM+OTCM acquisitions across most examined phantoms (p < 0.05). OTCM reduces radiation dose to exposed radiosensitive organs with the eye lens and breast buds exhibiting the highest dose reduction. The OTCM exposure window is narrowed at short t. An increase in noise is inevitable in images located within the OTCM-activated imaged volume. • In pediatric CT, organ-based tube current modulation reduces radiation dose to all major primarily exposed radiosensitive organs. • Image noise increases within the organ-based tube current modulation enabled imaged volume. • The angular range of the organ-based tube current modulation low exposure window is reduced with tube rotation time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32435930
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06888-5
pii: 10.1007/s00330-020-06888-5
pmc: PMC7476969
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5728-5737Subventions
Organisme : H2020 Euratom
ID : No 755523 (MEDIRAD)
Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):W65-73
pubmed: 22733933
Invest Radiol. 2013 Apr;48(4):192-9
pubmed: 23344518
Med Phys. 2016 May;43(5):2108
pubmed: 27147323
Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):6084-92
pubmed: 22047373
Invest Radiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):109-15
pubmed: 21857528
Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332
pubmed: 18082557
Radiology. 2012 Jan;262(1):191-8
pubmed: 22190658
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):260-6
pubmed: 25153159
Eur Radiol. 2014 Oct;24(10):2520-31
pubmed: 25027840
Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6572-8
pubmed: 26520748
Phys Med. 2015 Dec;31(8):882-888
pubmed: 26123368
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013 Dec;157(2):193-205
pubmed: 23734058
Invest Radiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):148-52
pubmed: 21934513
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 15;168(6):620-31
pubmed: 18664497
Eur Radiol. 2016 Aug;26(8):2656-62
pubmed: 26560717
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):689-95
pubmed: 21862813
Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Sep;44(9):1065-9
pubmed: 25022489
Radiat Res. 2007 Feb;167(2):233-43
pubmed: 17390731
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 08;17(3):380-391
pubmed: 27167255
Circulation. 2010 Dec 7;122(23):2394-402
pubmed: 21098451
Invest Radiol. 2019 May;54(5):265-272
pubmed: 30562273
Radiology. 2018 Jul;288(1):164-169
pubmed: 29584596
Med Phys. 2017 Feb;44(2):665-678
pubmed: 28032894
Eur Radiol. 2008 Apr;18(4):759-72
pubmed: 18066555