Perceptions of receiving behaviour change interventions from GPs during routine consultations: A qualitative study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
21
01
2020
accepted:
04
05
2020
entrez:
22
5
2020
pubmed:
22
5
2020
medline:
13
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
General Practitioners (GPs) are expected to provide patients with health behaviour change interventions, yet little is known about the views of patients themselves. We aimed to understand recent patients': (1) general expectations about GPs delivering health behaviour change interventions during routine consultations (including perceptions of appropriateness and helpfulness for receiving interventions), (2) perceptions of responsibility for GPs to talk about health behaviours, and (3) experiences of receiving behaviour change interventions. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who had recently attended a routine GP consultation. Data were analysed thematically. Three major themes were identified: (1) acceptability of discussions about behaviour change, (2) establishing clinician-patient rapport, and (3) healthcare professionals as a credible source and well placed to offer behaviour change interventions. Most patients were positive about, and were willing to accept behaviour change interventions from their GP during a routine consultation. Although behaviour change was perceived as a sensitive topic for patients, the doctor-patient relationship was perceived to provide an effective platform to discuss behaviour change, with the GP perceived as an appropriate and important healthcare professional from whom to receive advice. Contrary to the views of GPs, behaviour change interventions were perceived by patients as appropriate and helpful during routine medical consultations, particularly where behaviour change could have a positive effect on long-term condition management. Behaviour change interventions delivered by GPs during routine consultations could be used effectively in time-restricted consultations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32437462
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233399
pii: PONE-D-20-01897
pmc: PMC7241720
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0233399Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Behav Med. 2016 Apr;23(2):168-78
pubmed: 26490451
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(10):e017902
pubmed: 29118053
BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 31;16:290
pubmed: 27030251
Health Psychol. 2015 Mar;34(3):253-61
pubmed: 25133842
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1121-37
pubmed: 26340682
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 02;15:215
pubmed: 26032696
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Sep;68(674):e646-e653
pubmed: 30104329
BMC Obes. 2018 Feb 12;5:7
pubmed: 29449953
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jun;87(3):389-94
pubmed: 22205055
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 21;13(1):122
pubmed: 30241557
Prev Sci. 2020 Apr;21(3):319-331
pubmed: 32067156
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):571-592
pubmed: 30977291
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2492-2500
pubmed: 27789061
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jan;53(1):91-100; discussion 101-3
pubmed: 16422698
Addiction. 2005 Oct;100(10):1423-31
pubmed: 16185204
Med Care Res Rev. 2012 Oct;69(5):495-518
pubmed: 22457269
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 12;14(2):e0212169
pubmed: 30753213
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Sep;59(566):682-90
pubmed: 19674514
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):897-908
pubmed: 28089308
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;46(9):625-31
pubmed: 22711796
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Jul;12(7):685-94
pubmed: 20472696
Lung Cancer. 2019 Feb;128:1-5
pubmed: 30642439