Circulating mRNAs are differentially expressed in pregnancies with severe placental insufficiency and at high risk of stillbirth.
Circulating mRNA
Fetal growth restriction
Fetal hypoxia
Pregnancy
Journal
BMC medicine
ISSN: 1741-7015
Titre abrégé: BMC Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190723
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 05 2020
22 05 2020
Historique:
received:
04
02
2020
accepted:
24
04
2020
entrez:
23
5
2020
pubmed:
23
5
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fetuses affected by placental insufficiency do not receive adequate nutrients and oxygenation, become growth restricted and acidemic, and can demise. Preterm fetal growth restriction is a severe form of placental insufficiency with a high risk of stillbirth. We set out to identify maternal circulating mRNA transcripts that are differentially expressed in preterm pregnancies complicated by very severe placental insufficiency, in utero fetal acidemia, and are at very high risk of stillbirth. We performed a cohort study across six hospitals in Australia and New Zealand, prospectively collecting blood from 128 pregnancies complicated by preterm fetal growth restriction (delivery < 34 weeks' gestation) and 42 controls. RNA-sequencing was done on all samples to discover circulating mRNAs associated with preterm fetal growth restriction and fetal acidemia in utero. We used RT-PCR to validate the associations between five lead candidate biomarkers of placental insufficiency in an independent cohort from Europe (46 with preterm fetal growth restriction) and in a third cohort of pregnancies ending in stillbirth. In the Australia and New Zealand cohort, we identified five mRNAs that were highly differentially expressed among pregnancies with preterm fetal growth restriction: NR4A2, EMP1, PGM5, SKIL, and UGT2B1. Combining three yielded an area under the receiver operative curve (AUC) of 0.95. Circulating NR4A2 and RCBTB2 in the maternal blood were dysregulated in the presence of fetal acidemia in utero. We validated the association between preterm fetal growth restriction and circulating EMP1, NR4A2, and PGM5 mRNA in a cohort from Europe. Combining EMP1 and PGM5 identified fetal growth restriction with an AUC of 0.92. Several of these genes were differentially expressed in the presence of ultrasound parameters that reflect placental insufficiency. Circulating NR4A2, EMP1, and RCBTB2 mRNA were differentially regulated in another cohort destined for stillbirth, compared to ongoing pregnancies. EMP1 mRNA appeared to have the most consistent association with placental insufficiency in all cohorts. Measuring circulating mRNA offers potential as a test to identify pregnancies with severe placental insufficiency and at very high risk of stillbirth. Circulating mRNA EMP1 may be promising as a biomarker of severe placental insufficiency.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Fetuses affected by placental insufficiency do not receive adequate nutrients and oxygenation, become growth restricted and acidemic, and can demise. Preterm fetal growth restriction is a severe form of placental insufficiency with a high risk of stillbirth. We set out to identify maternal circulating mRNA transcripts that are differentially expressed in preterm pregnancies complicated by very severe placental insufficiency, in utero fetal acidemia, and are at very high risk of stillbirth.
METHODS
We performed a cohort study across six hospitals in Australia and New Zealand, prospectively collecting blood from 128 pregnancies complicated by preterm fetal growth restriction (delivery < 34 weeks' gestation) and 42 controls. RNA-sequencing was done on all samples to discover circulating mRNAs associated with preterm fetal growth restriction and fetal acidemia in utero. We used RT-PCR to validate the associations between five lead candidate biomarkers of placental insufficiency in an independent cohort from Europe (46 with preterm fetal growth restriction) and in a third cohort of pregnancies ending in stillbirth.
RESULTS
In the Australia and New Zealand cohort, we identified five mRNAs that were highly differentially expressed among pregnancies with preterm fetal growth restriction: NR4A2, EMP1, PGM5, SKIL, and UGT2B1. Combining three yielded an area under the receiver operative curve (AUC) of 0.95. Circulating NR4A2 and RCBTB2 in the maternal blood were dysregulated in the presence of fetal acidemia in utero. We validated the association between preterm fetal growth restriction and circulating EMP1, NR4A2, and PGM5 mRNA in a cohort from Europe. Combining EMP1 and PGM5 identified fetal growth restriction with an AUC of 0.92. Several of these genes were differentially expressed in the presence of ultrasound parameters that reflect placental insufficiency. Circulating NR4A2, EMP1, and RCBTB2 mRNA were differentially regulated in another cohort destined for stillbirth, compared to ongoing pregnancies. EMP1 mRNA appeared to have the most consistent association with placental insufficiency in all cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS
Measuring circulating mRNA offers potential as a test to identify pregnancies with severe placental insufficiency and at very high risk of stillbirth. Circulating mRNA EMP1 may be promising as a biomarker of severe placental insufficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32438913
doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01605-x
pii: 10.1186/s12916-020-01605-x
pmc: PMC7243334
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Messenger
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
145Subventions
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
ID : 1028521;1183854;1055795;1146128;1159261;11364118
Pays : International
Organisme : FP7 Ideas: European Research Council ()
ID : 305823
Pays : International
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):2467-2472
pubmed: 29453278
BJOG. 2017 Mar;124(4):584-594
pubmed: 27704703
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Nov;36(11):997-1008
pubmed: 27711965
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 13;6:CD007529
pubmed: 28613398
Genome Biol. 2010;11(3):R25
pubmed: 20196867
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):43
pubmed: 28114884
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S829-S840
pubmed: 29229321
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):253-61
pubmed: 17267821
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 5;115(23):E5334-E5343
pubmed: 29777089
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 May;49:37-52
pubmed: 29753694
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):273-4
pubmed: 25262153
Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 1;30(7):923-30
pubmed: 24227677
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7361-6
pubmed: 24799715
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;51(3):313-322
pubmed: 28708272
BMC Med. 2013 Dec 09;11:256
pubmed: 24314237
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S774-S782.e21
pubmed: 29233550
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):333-9
pubmed: 26909664
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 17;116(38):19200-19208
pubmed: 31481608
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;98(3):E429-36
pubmed: 23337725
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 21;3:CD004454
pubmed: 28321847
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 May 7;47(8):e47
pubmed: 30783653
Lancet. 2015 May 30;385(9983):2162-72
pubmed: 25747582
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Nov;96(11):E1807-15
pubmed: 21865357
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Feb 07;10:55
pubmed: 30792696
Science. 2018 Jun 8;360(6393):1133-1136
pubmed: 29880692
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 4;16(10):e1002923
pubmed: 31584941
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 May;49:53-65
pubmed: 29606482
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article3
pubmed: 16646809