Stellate Ganglion Blockade for the Treatment of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias.


Journal

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
ISSN: 2405-5018
Titre abrégé: JACC Clin Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101656995

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 23 09 2019
revised: 13 12 2019
accepted: 27 12 2019
entrez: 23 5 2020
pubmed: 23 5 2020
medline: 19 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study sought to describe our institutional experience with establishing a neurocardiology service in an attempt to provide autonomic modulation as a treatment for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Treatment-refractory VAs are commonly driven and exacerbated by heightened sympathetic tone. Among patients referred to the neurocardiology service (August 2016 to December 2018), we performed ultrasound-based, bilateral, temporary stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) in 20 consecutive patients. We analyzed outcomes of interest including sustained VA or VA requiring defibrillation in the 24 and 48 h before and 24 and 48 h after SGB. The majority of patients were men (n = 19, 95%), with a mean age of 58 ± 14 years. At the time of SGB, 10 (50%) were on inotropic support and 9 (45%) were on mechanical circulatory support. Besides 1 case of hoarseness, there were no apparent procedural complications. SGB was associated with a reduction in the number of VA episodes from the 24 h before (median 5.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 2.0 to 15.8]) to 24 h after SGB (median 0 [IQR: 0 to 3.8]) (p < 0.001). The number of defibrillation events decreased from 2.5 (IQR: 0 to 10.3) to 0 (IQR: 0 to 2.5) (p = 0.002). Similar findings were observed over the 48-h period before and after the SGB. Overall, 9 of 20 (45%) patients had a complete response with no recurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) for 48 h after SGB. Four (20%) patients had no recurrent VT or VF following SGB through discharge. Similar response rates were observed in those with ischemic (median 6 [IQR: 1.8 to 18.8] to 0.5 [IQR: 0 to 5.3] events; p = 0.031) and nonischemic (median 3.5 [IQR: 1.8 to 6.8] to 0 [IQR: 0 to 1.3] events; p = 0.012) cardiomyopathy. Minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided bilateral SGB appears safe and provides substantial reduction in VA burden with approximately 1 in 2 patients exhibiting complete suppression of VT or VF for 48 h.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVES
This study sought to describe our institutional experience with establishing a neurocardiology service in an attempt to provide autonomic modulation as a treatment for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).
BACKGROUND
Treatment-refractory VAs are commonly driven and exacerbated by heightened sympathetic tone.
METHODS
Among patients referred to the neurocardiology service (August 2016 to December 2018), we performed ultrasound-based, bilateral, temporary stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) in 20 consecutive patients. We analyzed outcomes of interest including sustained VA or VA requiring defibrillation in the 24 and 48 h before and 24 and 48 h after SGB.
RESULTS
The majority of patients were men (n = 19, 95%), with a mean age of 58 ± 14 years. At the time of SGB, 10 (50%) were on inotropic support and 9 (45%) were on mechanical circulatory support. Besides 1 case of hoarseness, there were no apparent procedural complications. SGB was associated with a reduction in the number of VA episodes from the 24 h before (median 5.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 2.0 to 15.8]) to 24 h after SGB (median 0 [IQR: 0 to 3.8]) (p < 0.001). The number of defibrillation events decreased from 2.5 (IQR: 0 to 10.3) to 0 (IQR: 0 to 2.5) (p = 0.002). Similar findings were observed over the 48-h period before and after the SGB. Overall, 9 of 20 (45%) patients had a complete response with no recurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) for 48 h after SGB. Four (20%) patients had no recurrent VT or VF following SGB through discharge. Similar response rates were observed in those with ischemic (median 6 [IQR: 1.8 to 18.8] to 0.5 [IQR: 0 to 5.3] events; p = 0.031) and nonischemic (median 3.5 [IQR: 1.8 to 6.8] to 0 [IQR: 0 to 1.3] events; p = 0.012) cardiomyopathy.
CONCLUSIONS
Minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided bilateral SGB appears safe and provides substantial reduction in VA burden with approximately 1 in 2 patients exhibiting complete suppression of VT or VF for 48 h.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32439042
pii: S2405-500X(20)30073-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.12.017
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

562-571

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Marat Fudim (M)

Duke Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: marat.fudim@dm.duke.edu.

Yawar J Qadri (YJ)

Duke Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Nathan H Waldron (NH)

Duke Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Richard L Boortz-Marx (RL)

Duke Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Arun Ganesh (A)

Duke Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Chetan B Patel (CB)

Duke Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Mihai V Podgoreanu (MV)

Duke Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Albert Y Sun (AY)

Duke Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Carmelo A Milano (CA)

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Betty C Tong (BC)

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

David H Harpole (DH)

Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Joseph P Mathew (JP)

Duke Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Jonathan P Piccini (JP)

Duke Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH