Measuring Stigma to Assess the Social Justice Implications of Health-Related Policy Decisions: Application to Novel Treatment Regimens for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.
drug resistance
health policy
social justice
social stigma
tuberculosis
Journal
MDM policy & practice
ISSN: 2381-4683
Titre abrégé: MDM Policy Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101707716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
24
11
2019
accepted:
28
02
2020
entrez:
23
5
2020
pubmed:
23
5
2020
medline:
23
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In making policy decisions with constrained resources, an important consideration is the impact of alternative policy options on social justice. Social justice considers interactions between individuals and society and can be conceptualized across domains of agency, association, and respect. Despite its importance, social justice is rarely considered formally in health policy decision making, partially reflecting challenges in its measurement. We define three criteria for considering social justice in health-related policy decisions: 1) linkage of social justice to a measurable construct; 2) ability to reproducibly and feasibly estimate the impacts of a policy decision on the selected construct; and 3) appropriate presentation to decision makers of the expected social justice implications using that construct. We use preliminary data from qualitative interviews from three groups of respondents in South Africa and Uganda to demonstrate that stigma meets the first of these criteria. We then use the example of policy addressing novel treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and a validated tuberculosis stigma scale to illustrate how policy effects on stigma could be estimated (criterion 2) and presented to decision makers in the form of justice-enhanced cost-effectiveness analysis (criterion 3). Finally, we provide a point-by-point guide for conducting similar assessments to facilitate consideration of social justice in health-related policy decisions. Our case study and guide for how to make social justice impacts more apparent to decision makers also illustrates the importance of local data and local capacity. Performing social justice assessments alongside more traditional evaluations of cost-effectiveness, budget impact, and burden of disease could help represent data-informed considerations of social justice in health care decision making more broadly.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32440569
doi: 10.1177/2381468320915239
pii: 10.1177_2381468320915239
pmc: PMC7227142
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2381468320915239Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI114458
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Control Clin Trials. 1990 Apr;11(2):116-28
pubmed: 2161310
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jul;18(7):e183-e198
pubmed: 29580819
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990 Aug;23(2 Pt 1):236-41
pubmed: 2145325
BMC Med. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):17
pubmed: 30764819
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Dec;9(12):1373-7
pubmed: 16468160
Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):394-397
pubmed: 29680094
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002 Jul;6(7):622-7
pubmed: 12102302
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Jan;13(1):21-30
pubmed: 18290998
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):629-36
pubmed: 25713967
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;198:27-35
pubmed: 29274616
Public Health Ethics. 2018 Jul 18;11(3):275-292
pubmed: 30429873
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Nov 1;21(11):69-74
pubmed: 29025487
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Jul;6(7):486-488
pubmed: 29859919
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Feb;16(1):43-54
pubmed: 28980217
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e712-23
pubmed: 26475018