Reproduction in a polluted world: implications for wildlife.


Journal

Reproduction (Cambridge, England)
ISSN: 1741-7899
Titre abrégé: Reproduction
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966036

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 22 03 2020
accepted: 20 05 2020
pubmed: 23 5 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 23 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Environmental pollution is an increasing problem for wildlife globally. Animals are confronted with many different forms of pollution, including chemicals, light, noise, and heat, and these can disrupt critical biological processes such as reproduction. Impacts on reproductive processes can dramatically reduce the number and quality of offspring produced by exposed individuals, and this can have further repercussions on the ecology and evolution of affected populations. Here, we illustrate how environmental pollutants can affect various components of reproduction in wildlife, including direct impacts on reproductive physiology and development, consequences for gamete quality and function, as well as effects on sexual communication, sexual selection, and parental care. We follow with a discussion of the broader ecological and evolutionary consequences of these effects on reproduction and suggest future directions that may enable us to better understand and address the effects of environmental pollution.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32442963
doi: 10.1530/REP-20-0154
pii: REP-20-0154
doi:
pii:

Substances chimiques

Environmental Pollutants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

R13-R23

Auteurs

Lucinda C Aulsebrook (LC)

School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

Michael G Bertram (MG)

School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.

Jake M Martin (JM)

School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

Anne E Aulsebrook (AE)

School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Tomas Brodin (T)

Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.

Jonathan P Evans (JP)

School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Matthew D Hall (MD)

School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

Moira K O'Bryan (MK)

School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

Andrew J Pask (AJ)

School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Charles R Tyler (CR)

Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Bob B M Wong (BBM)

School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH