Tibial Tray with a Stem: Does It Have Any Role in Primary Cemented Total Knee Replacement?
Journal
The journal of knee surgery
ISSN: 1938-2480
Titre abrégé: J Knee Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101137599
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
23
5
2020
medline:
29
12
2021
entrez:
23
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Over many decades, total knee replacement (TKR) has become the ideal treatment option for advanced arthritis. Many designs were introduced to increase the stability of the tibial tray, hence the longevity of the prosthesis. This retrospective study was performed on 168 patients who received NexGen cemented primary total knee either with standard tibial tray (group A) or tibial tray with an intramedullary stem (group B) between May 2008 and May 2017. We reviewed all preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiological data retrospectively. In addition, a prospective clinical and radiological reassessment was done. Our aim was to answer the following questions: (1) Is there any difference between both groups in regard to clinical and radiological results? (2) Is there any difference in the revision rate? (3) Is there a role of using stemmed tibial tray in primary TKR? Better results were recorded in obese and severely obese patients having stemmed cemented tibial tray and so for patients with marked and severe preoperative varus angle. Our recommendations are to use cemented tibial tray with a stem in complicated primary surgery without fear of adverse effects on short and intermediate terms of follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32443161
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712085
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15-20Informations de copyright
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.