Animal Welfare Centres: Are They Useful for the Improvement of Animal Welfare?

animal welfare animal welfare science animal wellbeing centres of animal welfare

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 May 2020
Historique:
received: 22 04 2020
revised: 13 05 2020
accepted: 14 05 2020
entrez: 24 5 2020
pubmed: 24 5 2020
medline: 24 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Animal welfare has emerged as a scientific discipline only in the past 30 years, but a significant body of scientists has developed worldwide in this time. Over the past quarter century, several aggregations of scientists, centres of animal welfare, have become established. This can bring the benefits of the recognition of expertise and an opportunity to support animal industries in improving welfare, but it also brings the risk of scientists being influenced by these industries and failing to identify animal welfare problems as such. We conducted a bibliometric search of the scientific literature with the purpose of comparing the characteristics of publications on animal welfare that were or were not from animal welfare centres in academic institutions. We found that the number of publications on animal welfare from centres of animal welfare increased, initially, in the early 2000s and again in the last decade. Significant funding was obtained from the livestock industries for these centres. In a second search, we identified that only about 8% of scientific publications on animal welfare came from animal welfare centres, and the rest were mainly supported by funding sources other than the animal industries. It is concluded that the emergence of significant animal welfare centres, often with significant funding from industry, allows clusters of scientists to develop that could advance animal welfare knowledge more effectively than disparate scientists in isolated institutions. However, industry funding risks these scientists being aligned with industry goals that may not include animal welfare improvement to the extent required by the public. Further research to identify any ethical conflicts for scientists in animal welfare centres would be warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32443472
pii: ani10050877
doi: 10.3390/ani10050877
pmc: PMC7278406
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

Références

Rev Sci Tech. 2009 Aug;28(2):617-25
pubmed: 20128472
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1988 Feb;95(2):83-5
pubmed: 3286210
Vet Rec. 1987 Oct 24;121(17):400-2
pubmed: 3686804
J Vet Med Educ. 2005 Winter;32(4):422-37
pubmed: 16421823
Acta Biotheor. 2011 Jun;59(2):121-37
pubmed: 21347723

Auteurs

Clive J C Phillips (CJC)

Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
Animal Welfare Laboratory, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, R. dos Funcionarios 1540, Brazil.

Carla F M Molento (CFM)

Animal Welfare Laboratory, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, R. dos Funcionarios 1540, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH