Implementing volunteer-navigation for older persons with advanced chronic illness (Nav-CARE): a knowledge to action study.
(3–10) volunteers
Compassionate community
Hospice
Knowledge translation
Navigation
Palliative
Palliative approach
Public-health
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 May 2020
22 May 2020
Historique:
received:
02
03
2020
accepted:
14
05
2020
entrez:
24
5
2020
pubmed:
24
5
2020
medline:
14
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nav-CARE is a volunteer-led intervention designed to build upon strategic directions in palliative care: a palliative approach to care, a public health/compassionate community approach to care, and enhancing the capacity of volunteerism. Nav-CARE uses specially trained volunteers to provide lay navigation for older persons and family living at home with advanced chronic illness. The goal of this study was to better understand the implementation factors that influenced the utilization of Nav-CARE in eight diverse Canadian contexts. This was a Knowledge to Action study using the planned action cycle for Nav-CARE developed through previous studies. Participants were eight community-based hospice societies located in diverse geographic contexts and with diverse capacities. Implementation data was collected at baseline, midpoint, and endpoint using qualitative individual and group interviews. Field notes of all interactions with study sites were also used as part of the data set. Data was analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques. The study received ethical approval from three university behavioural review boards. All participants provided written consent. At baseline, stakeholders perceived Nav-CARE to be a good fit with the strategic directions of their organization by providing early palliative support, by facilitating outreach into the community and by changing the public perception of palliative care. The contextual factors that determined the ease with which Nav-CARE was implemented included the volunteer coordinator champion, organizational capacity and connection, the ability to successfully recruit older persons, and the adequacy of volunteer preparation and mentorship. This study highlighted the importance of community-based champions for the success of volunteer-led initiatives and the critical need for support and mentorship for both volunteers and those who lead them. Further, although the underutilization of hospice has been widely recognized, it is vital to recognize the limitations of their capacity. New initiatives such as Nav-CARE, which are designed to enhance their contributions to palliative care, need to be accompanied by adequate resources. Finally, this study illustrated the need to think carefully about the language and role of hospice societies as palliative care moves toward a public health approach to care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Nav-CARE is a volunteer-led intervention designed to build upon strategic directions in palliative care: a palliative approach to care, a public health/compassionate community approach to care, and enhancing the capacity of volunteerism. Nav-CARE uses specially trained volunteers to provide lay navigation for older persons and family living at home with advanced chronic illness. The goal of this study was to better understand the implementation factors that influenced the utilization of Nav-CARE in eight diverse Canadian contexts.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a Knowledge to Action study using the planned action cycle for Nav-CARE developed through previous studies. Participants were eight community-based hospice societies located in diverse geographic contexts and with diverse capacities. Implementation data was collected at baseline, midpoint, and endpoint using qualitative individual and group interviews. Field notes of all interactions with study sites were also used as part of the data set. Data was analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques. The study received ethical approval from three university behavioural review boards. All participants provided written consent.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At baseline, stakeholders perceived Nav-CARE to be a good fit with the strategic directions of their organization by providing early palliative support, by facilitating outreach into the community and by changing the public perception of palliative care. The contextual factors that determined the ease with which Nav-CARE was implemented included the volunteer coordinator champion, organizational capacity and connection, the ability to successfully recruit older persons, and the adequacy of volunteer preparation and mentorship.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlighted the importance of community-based champions for the success of volunteer-led initiatives and the critical need for support and mentorship for both volunteers and those who lead them. Further, although the underutilization of hospice has been widely recognized, it is vital to recognize the limitations of their capacity. New initiatives such as Nav-CARE, which are designed to enhance their contributions to palliative care, need to be accompanied by adequate resources. Finally, this study illustrated the need to think carefully about the language and role of hospice societies as palliative care moves toward a public health approach to care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32443979
doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00578-1
pii: 10.1186/s12904-020-00578-1
pmc: PMC7245025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
72Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 148655
Pays : Canada
Organisme : Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute
ID : 704887
Références
J Palliat Care. 2007 Autumn;23(3):143-53
pubmed: 18069435
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Nov;25(6):1704-1713
pubmed: 25810042
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2013 May;29(2):76-90
pubmed: 23651677
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008 Apr-May;25(2):121-6
pubmed: 18445862
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Mar 14;16(1):18
pubmed: 28288598
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016 Mar;6(1):60-5
pubmed: 25023218
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77-84
pubmed: 20014004
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):2
pubmed: 28673300
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 May;35(5):780-787
pubmed: 29129107
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24
pubmed: 16557505
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 22;164(21):2321-4
pubmed: 15557410
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2014 Summer;24(3):144-53
pubmed: 25189052
QJM. 2013 Dec;106(12):1071-5
pubmed: 24082152
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 Mar;20(2):190-8
pubmed: 21978371
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Mar;52(3):756-68
pubmed: 25205665
Can J Nurs Res. 2011 Sep;43(3):7-15
pubmed: 21977723
J Palliat Med. 2007 Oct;10(5):1023-8
pubmed: 17985954
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 Jan;39(1):E58-69
pubmed: 22201669
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Jan 05;15:1
pubmed: 25559550
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2019 Mar 2;25(3):107
pubmed: 30892998
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S118-S129
pubmed: 29764178
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 15;15:5
pubmed: 26772180
Aust J Rural Health. 2016 Dec;24(6):350-356
pubmed: 27385270
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Feb;15(1):33-40
pubmed: 21278039
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Sep;29(3):449-57
pubmed: 24683043
Chronic Illn. 2005 Dec;1(4):321-9
pubmed: 17152456
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jan;61(1):126-31
pubmed: 23205716
Health Soc Care Community. 2002 Jul;10(4):239-46
pubmed: 12193167
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2017 Jul/Sep;40(3):261-277
pubmed: 27930401
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jun 5;16(1):37
pubmed: 28583176
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Nov;59(11):1149-50
pubmed: 24235182
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(2):1717
pubmed: 21609132
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Feb;31(1):69-78
pubmed: 23277631
Can J Aging. 2016 Jun;35(2):206-14
pubmed: 27093177