Comparisons of Estimates From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and Other National Health Surveys, 2011-2016.
Journal
American journal of preventive medicine
ISSN: 1873-2607
Titre abrégé: Am J Prev Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8704773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
14
08
2019
revised:
16
01
2020
accepted:
17
01
2020
entrez:
24
5
2020
pubmed:
24
5
2020
medline:
26
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is composed of telephone surveys that collect state data from non-institutionalized U.S. adults regarding health-related risk behaviors and chronic health conditions. A new design was implemented in 2011 to include participants on cellular telephones. It is important to validate estimates since 2011. A total of 10 key and widely used variables between BRFSS and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) or National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) in 2011-2016 were compared. Data analysis was conducted in 2018. Between BRFSS and NHANES, similar linear time trends of prevalences or means were found for 8 of 9 studied variables. There were no significant differences in the prevalences of the following variables: self-reported fair/poor health, ever told have diabetes, and ever told to have hypertension. In trend comparison of BRFSS versus NHIS, interactions of prevalence between survey and time period were not found for 5 variables: current smoking, self-reported fair/poor health, ever told have diabetes, and self-reported height and weight. Although there were significant differences in many estimates between BRFSS and either NHANES or NHIS, the absolute differences across years were rather small. Comparing BRFSS time trends with those of 2 national benchmark surveys in 10 key and widely used variables suggests that the trends of prevalences (or means) from BRFSS, NHANES, and NHIS are mostly similar. For many variables, despite statistically significant differences in the prevalences (or means) between surveys, absolute differences in most cases were small and not meaningful from a public health surveillance perspective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32444008
pii: S0749-3797(20)30091-X
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.025
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e181-e190Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Inc.