The effects of licorice containing diphenhydramine solution on recurrent aphthous stomatitis: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial.
Diphenhydramine
Glycyrrhiza glabra
Licorice
Recurrent aphthous stomatitis
Journal
Complementary therapies in medicine
ISSN: 1873-6963
Titre abrégé: Complement Ther Med
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 9308777
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
05
10
2019
revised:
24
03
2020
accepted:
03
04
2020
entrez:
24
5
2020
pubmed:
24
5
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the diphenhydramine solution (DS) and diphenhydramine-containing glycyrrhiza glabra (DSG) in the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS). It was a double-blind randomized clinical trial that was conducted from July to September 2018 at the Faculty of Dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran. DSG was made by adding 5% hydroethanolic extract of licorice to the diphenhydramine elixir. A total of 70 patients diagnosed with RSA were randomly assigned to the DS and DSG groups, each containing 35 patients. Participants were instructed to swish 3 ml of either solution around their mouth for about three minutes four times a day (at least 20 min before each meal and before bedtime) until the complete healing of the oral lesions. The primary outcome of this study was to assess the severity of pain prior to the intervention and on the first, third, and fifth days of it. This was done using the visual analog scale (VAS). The duration of wound healing was also measured through photography. The secondary outcome was to record the adverse effects of the intervention. This trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials under number The average pain score before the treatment in the DS and DSG groups was 8. 1 ± 1.17 and 7.97 ± 1.72, respectively, and there was apparently no significant difference between them. However, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the average pain scores on the first (7 ± 1.28 versus 5.31 ± 1.28), third (4.02 ± 1.8 vs. 2.86 ± 1.56) and fifth days (1.71 ± 1.69 vs. 0.54 ± 1.31) of the intervention. Indeed, DSG significantly reduced the average wound healing duration by 1.5 days, as compared to DS (P = 0.0001). No adverse effects were observed with the intervention. According to our results, DSG appeared to be more effective in treating RAS than DS alone. The trial was registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials before the enrolment of the first patient on June 29, 2019 (registration no: IRCT20180407039213N1, http://www.irct.ir/trial/31497).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32444056
pii: S0965-2299(19)31512-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102401
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mouthwashes
0
Plant Extracts
0
Diphenhydramine
8GTS82S83M
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102401Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.