Cell response to substrate rigidity is regulated by active and passive cytoskeletal stress.
cell polarity
cytoskeleton
mechanobiology
rigidity sensing
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 06 2020
09 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
24
5
2020
medline:
25
8
2020
entrez:
24
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Morphogenesis, tumor formation, and wound healing are regulated by tissue rigidity. Focal adhesion behavior is locally regulated by stiffness; however, how cells globally adapt, detect, and respond to rigidity remains unknown. Here, we studied the interplay between the rheological properties of the cytoskeleton and matrix rigidity. We seeded fibroblasts onto flexible microfabricated pillar arrays with varying stiffness and simultaneously measured the cytoskeleton organization, traction forces, and cell-rigidity responses at both the adhesion and cell scale. Cells adopted a rigidity-dependent phenotype whereby the actin cytoskeleton polarized on stiff substrates but not on soft. We further showed a crucial role of active and passive cross-linkers in rigidity-sensing responses. By reducing myosin II activity or knocking down α-actinin, we found that both promoted cell polarization on soft substrates, whereas α-actinin overexpression prevented polarization on stiff substrates. Atomic force microscopy indentation experiments showed that this polarization response correlated with cell stiffness, whereby cell stiffness decreased when active or passive cross-linking was reduced and softer cells polarized on softer matrices. Theoretical modeling of the actin network as an active gel suggests that adaptation to matrix rigidity is controlled by internal mechanical properties of the cytoskeleton and puts forward a universal scaling between nematic order of the actin cytoskeleton and the substrate-to-cell elastic modulus ratio. Altogether, our study demonstrates the implication of cell-scale mechanosensing through the internal stress within the actomyosin cytoskeleton and its coupling with local rigidity sensing at focal adhesions in the regulation of cell shape changes and polarity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32444491
pii: 1917555117
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917555117
pmc: PMC7293595
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cross-Linking Reagents
0
Actinin
11003-00-2
Myosins
EC 3.6.4.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12817-12825Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
Nat Mater. 2020 Feb;19(2):239-250
pubmed: 31659296
Nat Cell Biol. 2011 Nov 13;13(12):1457-65
pubmed: 22081092
Phys Biol. 2015 Feb 23;12(2):026001
pubmed: 25706686
Nat Cell Biol. 2015 Apr;17(4):445-57
pubmed: 25799062
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Oct 6;35:169-190
pubmed: 31412209
Biophys J. 1993 Jul;65(1):205-14
pubmed: 8369430
Mol Biol Cell. 2019 Jul 22;30(16):2025-2036
pubmed: 31216217
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002 Mar;282(3):C606-16
pubmed: 11832346
Mol Biol Cell. 2008 May;19(5):2147-53
pubmed: 18287519
Nat Cell Biol. 2008 Sep;10(9):1062-8
pubmed: 19160486
Soft Matter. 2019 Feb 20;15(8):1721-1729
pubmed: 30657157
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 21;8(1):1650
pubmed: 29162803
Nat Cell Biol. 2016 Jan;18(1):33-42
pubmed: 26619148
Biochem J. 2013 Jun 15;452(3):477-88
pubmed: 23557398
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 12;116(7):2595-2602
pubmed: 30692249
J Cell Biol. 2001 Jun 11;153(6):1175-86
pubmed: 11402062
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Dec;15(12):825-33
pubmed: 25355507
Nat Commun. 2015 Jun 25;6:7525
pubmed: 26109233
Nano Lett. 2016 Sep 14;16(9):5951-61
pubmed: 27559755
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 26;112(21):6619-24
pubmed: 25918384
Biophys J. 2000 Jul;79(1):144-52
pubmed: 10866943
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 27;106(43):18243-8
pubmed: 19805036
Phys Rev E. 2019 Jan;99(1-1):012412
pubmed: 30780372
J Cell Biol. 2012 Feb 6;196(3):363-74
pubmed: 22291038
Biophys J. 2018 Jun 19;114(12):2923-2932
pubmed: 29925028
Science. 2004 May 28;304(5675):1301-5
pubmed: 15166374
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 6;113(49):14043-14048
pubmed: 27872289
Mol Biol Cell. 2009 Dec;20(24):5166-80
pubmed: 19846664
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 08;6(3):e17807
pubmed: 21408137
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 26;103(52):19771-6
pubmed: 17179050
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):E1361-70
pubmed: 23515331
Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Nov 7;27(22):3471-3479
pubmed: 27122603
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 27;6:19686
pubmed: 26813872
J Cell Sci. 2019 Nov 14;132(22):
pubmed: 31615968
Cell. 1997 Jan 10;88(1):39-48
pubmed: 9019403
Nat Phys. 2019 Apr;15:393-402
pubmed: 30984281
Cell. 2006 Aug 25;126(4):677-89
pubmed: 16923388
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 3;112(9):2740-5
pubmed: 25730854
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Feb;19(2):133-141
pubmed: 28114270
J Biol Chem. 2018 Sep 14;293(37):14520-14533
pubmed: 30049798
Biophys J. 2005 Dec;89(6):L52-4
pubmed: 16214867
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 1;109(18):6933-8
pubmed: 22509005
Nano Lett. 2019 Oct 9;19(10):7514-7525
pubmed: 31466449
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 11;5(11):e13921
pubmed: 21085685
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005 Jan;60(1):24-34
pubmed: 15573414
Oncotarget. 2015 Aug 28;6(25):20946-58
pubmed: 26189182
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 7;103(6):1762-7
pubmed: 16446458
Curr Biol. 2016 Jun 6;26(11):1473-1479
pubmed: 27185555
Methods Cell Biol. 2015;125:289-308
pubmed: 25640435
Biophys J. 2004 Jan;86(1 Pt 1):617-28
pubmed: 14695306
Cell. 2012 Dec 21;151(7):1513-27
pubmed: 23260139
Elife. 2018 Oct 22;7:
pubmed: 30346273
Curr Biol. 2016 Mar 7;26(5):616-26
pubmed: 26898468
Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Jan 4;110(1):018103
pubmed: 23383843
Nano Lett. 2010 May 12;10(5):1823-30
pubmed: 20387859
Biophys J. 1994 Mar;66(3 Pt 1):801-9
pubmed: 8011912
J Cell Sci. 2012 Dec 15;125(Pt 24):5974-83
pubmed: 23097048