Fleeting Perceptual Experience and the Possibility of Recalling Without Seeing.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 05 2020
Historique:
received: 13 06 2019
accepted: 03 04 2020
entrez: 24 5 2020
pubmed: 24 5 2020
medline: 24 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We explore an intensely debated problem in neuroscience, psychology and philosophy: the degree to which the "phenomenological consciousness" of the experience of a stimulus is separable from the "access consciousness" of its reportability. Specifically, it has been proposed that these two measures are dissociated from one another in one, or both directions. However, even if it was agreed that reportability and experience were doubly dissociated, the limits of dissociation logic mean we would not be able to conclusively separate the cognitive processes underlying the two. We take advantage of computational modelling and recent advances in state-trace analysis to assess this dissociation in an attentional/experiential blink paradigm. These advances in state-trace analysis make use of Bayesian statistics to quantify the evidence for and against a dissociation. Further evidence is obtained by linking our finding to a prominent model of the attentional blink - the Simultaneous Type/Serial Token model. Our results show evidence for a dissociation between experience and reportability, whereby participants appear able to encode stimuli into working memory with little, if any, conscious experience of them. This raises the possibility of a phenomenon that might be called sight-blind recall, which we discuss in the context of the current experience/reportability debate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32444667
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64843-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-64843-2
pmc: PMC7244573
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8540

Références

Block, N. How many concepts of consciousness? Behavioral and brain sciences 18, 272–287 (1995).
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00038486
Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological monographs: General and applied 74, 1 (1960).
doi: 10.1037/h0093759
Vandenbroucke et al. Seeing without knowing: neural signatures of perceptual inference in the absence of report. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 26, 955–969 (2014).
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00530 pubmed: 24283494
Bronfman, Z. Z., Brezis, N., Jacobson, H. & Usher, M. We see more than we can report “cost free” color phenomenality outside focal attention. Psychological science 25, 1394–1403 (2014).
doi: 10.1177/0956797614532656 pubmed: 24815608
Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S. & Lamme, V. A. Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores? Plos one 3, e1699 (2008).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001699 pubmed: 18301775 pmcid: 2246033
Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J. & Sergent, C. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in cognitive sciences 10, 204–211 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007 pubmed: 16603406
De Gardelle, V., Sackur, J. & Kouider, S. Perceptual illusions in brief visual presentations. Consciousness and cognition 18, 569–577 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.03.002 pubmed: 19369096
Sergent, C. & Dehaene, S. Is consciousness a gradual phenomenon? evidence for an all-or-none bifurcation during the attentional blink. Psychological science 15, 720–728 (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00748.x pubmed: 15482443
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L. & Arnell, K. M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an rsvp task: An attentional blink? Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance 18, 849 (1992).
pubmed: 1500880
Bowman, H. & Wyble, B. The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. Psychological review 114, 38–70 LR: 20070117; CI: ((c) 2007; JID: 0376476; ppublish (2007).
Pincham, H. L., Bowman, H. & Szucs, D. The experiential blink: Mapping the cost of working memory encoding onto conscious perception in the attentional blink. Cortex 81, 35–49 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.007 pubmed: 27176633
Warrington, E. K. The double dissociation of short-and long-term memory. Human Memory and Amnesia (PLE: Memory) 4, 61 (2014).
Cousins, K. A., York, C., Bauer, L. & Grossman, M. Cognitive and anatomic double dissociation in the representation of concrete and abstract words in semantic variant and behavioral variant frontotemporal degeneration. Neuropsychologia 84, 244–251 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.025 pubmed: 26944874 pmcid: 4808428
Cohen, M. A., Cavanagh, P., Chun, M. M. & Nakayama, K. The attentional requirements of consciousness. Trends in cognitive sciences 16, 411–417 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.013 pubmed: 22795561
Hsieh, P.-J., Colas, J. T. & Kanwisher, N. Pop-out without awareness unseen feature singletons capture attention only when top-down attention is available. Psychological science Pmid:21852451 (2011).
den Bussche, E. V., Hughes, G., Humbeeck, N. V. & Reynvoet, B. The relation between consciousness and attention: An empirical study using the priming paradigm. Consciousness and cognition 19, 86–97 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.019 pubmed: 20097581
Marshall, J. C. & Halligan, P. W. Blindsight and insight in visuo-spatial neglect (1988).
Heathcote, A., Freeman, E., Etherington, J., Tonkin, J. & Bora, B. A dissociation between similarity effects in episodic face recognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review 16, 824–831 (2009).
doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.824
Bogartz, R. S. On the meaning of statistical interactions. Journal of experimental child psychology 22, 178–183 (1976).
doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(76)90099-0
Dunn, J. C. & Kirsner, K. Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association. Psychological review 95, 91 (1988).
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.91 pubmed: 3353477
Davis-Stober, C. P., Morey, R. D., Gretton, M. & Heathcote, A. Bayes factors for state-trace analysis. Journal of mathematical psychology 72, 116–129 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.08.004
Prince, M., Brown, S. & Heathcote, A. The design and analysis of state-trace experiments. Psychological methods 17, 78 (2012).
doi: 10.1037/a0025809 pubmed: 22040373
Wyble, B., Bowman, H. & Nieuwenstein, M. The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: sparing at a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35, 787 (2009).
pubmed: 19485692
Nieuwenhuis, S. & de Kleijn, R. Consciousness of targets during the attentional blink: a gradual or all-or-none dimension? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 73, 364–373 (2011).
doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0026-1
Simione, L., Akyrek, E. G., Vastola, V., Raffone, A. & Bowman, H. Illusions of integration are subjectively impenetrable: Phenomenological experience of lag 1 percepts during dual-target rsvp. Consciousness and cognition 51, 181–192 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.004 pubmed: 28388483
Newell, B. R. & Dunn, J. C. Dimensions in data: Testing psychological models using state-trace analysis. Trends in cognitive sciences 12, 285–290 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.009 pubmed: 18606559
Loftus, G. R., Oberg, M. A. & Dillon, A. M. Linear theory, dimensional theory, and the face-inversion effect. Psychological review 111, 835 (2004).
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.835 pubmed: 15482064
Sense, F., Morey, C. C., Prince, M., Heathcote, A. & Morey, R. D. Opportunity for verbalization does not improve visual change detection performance: A state-trace analysis. Behavior research methods 49, 853–862 (2017).
doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0741-1 pubmed: 27287448
Lindley, D. V. A statistical paradox. Biometrika 44, 187–192 (1957).
doi: 10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.187
Wyble, B. & Bowman, H. Computational and experimental evaluation of the attentional blink: Testing the simultaneous type serial token model. In CogSci, 2371–2376 (2005).
Craston, P., Wyble, B., Chennu, S. & Bowman, H. The attentional blink reveals serial working memory encoding: Evidence from virtual and human event-related potentials. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 21, 550–566 (2009).
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21036 pubmed: 18564042
Roberts, S. & Pashler, H. How persuasive is a good fit? a comment on theory testing. Psychological review 107, 358 (2000).
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.358 pubmed: 10789200
Gootjes-Dreesbach, E. L. Awareness & Perception in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kent (2015).
Tulving, E. Similarity relations in recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 479–496 (1981).
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90129-8
Soto, D. & Silvanto, J. Reappraising the relationship between working memory and conscious awareness. Trends in cognitive sciences 18, 520–525 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.005 pubmed: 25070269
Bergström, F. & Eriksson, J. Maintenance of non-consciously presented information engages the prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in human neuroscience 8, 938 (2014).
pubmed: 25484862 pmcid: 4240068
Lau, H. C. & Passingham, R. E. Relative blindsight in normal observers and the neural correlate of visual consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, 18763–18768 Pmid:17124173 (2006).
Chun, M. M. & Potter, M. C. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human perception and performance 21, 109 (1995).
pubmed: 7707027
Fleming, S. M. & Lau, H. C. How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in human neuroscience 8, 443 (2014).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443 pubmed: 25076880 pmcid: 4097944
Lau, H. & Rosenthal, D. Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in cognitive sciences 15, 365–373 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009 pubmed: 21737339
Cleeremans, A. Connecting conscious and unconscious processing. Cognitive science 38, 1286–1315 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/cogs.12149 pubmed: 25087683

Auteurs

William Jones (W)

Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. wrjkent@gmail.com.

Hannah Pincham (H)

South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Ellis Luise Gootjes-Dreesbach (EL)

Point Estimate Limited, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, UK.

Howard Bowman (H)

Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Classifications MeSH