The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Global Survey on Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer.


Journal

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
ISSN: 1556-1380
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020
Historique:
received: 03 03 2020
revised: 30 04 2020
accepted: 05 05 2020
pubmed: 24 5 2020
medline: 2 2 2021
entrez: 24 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Access to targeted therapies for lung cancer depends on the accurate identification of patients' biomarkers through molecular testing. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) conducted an international survey to evaluate perceptions on current practice and barriers to implementation of molecular testing. We distributed the survey to IASLC members and other health care professionals around the world. The survey included a seven-question introduction for all respondents, who then answered according to one of three tracks: (1) requesting tests and treating patients, (2) performing and interpreting assays, or (3) tissue acquisition. Barriers to implementing molecular testing were provided in free-response fields. The chi-square test was used for regional comparisons. A total of 2537 respondents from 102 countries participated. Most respondents who test and treat patients believe that less than 50% of patients with lung cancer in their country receive molecular testing, but reported higher rates within their own practice. Although many results varied by region, the five most frequent barriers cited in all regions were cost, quality and standards, access, awareness, and turnaround time. Many respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the current state of molecular testing for lung cancer, including 41% of those performing and interpreting assays. Issues identified included trouble understanding results (37%) and the quality of the samples (23% reported >10% rejection rate). Despite concerns regarding the quality of testing, 47% in the performing and interpreting track stated there is no policy or strategy to improve quality in their country. In addition, 33% of respondents who request tests and treat patients were unaware of the most recent College of American Pathologists, IASLC, and Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines for molecular testing. Adoption of molecular testing for lung cancer is relatively low across the world. Barriers include cost, access, quality, turnaround time, and lack of awareness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32445813
pii: S1556-0864(20)30383-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.05.002
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1434-1448

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Matthew P Smeltzer (MP)

Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee. Electronic address: msmltzer@memphis.edu.

Murry W Wynes (MW)

International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado.

Sylvie Lantuejoul (S)

Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard UNICANCER, and CRCL, Lyon and Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.

Ross Soo (R)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.

Suresh S Ramalingam (SS)

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Marileila Varella-Garcia (M)

Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado.

Meghan Meadows Taylor (M)

Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.

Kristin Richeimer (K)

International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado.

Kelsey Wood (K)

International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado.

Kristen E Howell (KE)

Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.

Mercedes Lilana Dalurzo (ML)

Department of Pathology, Hospital Italiano Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Enriqueta Felip (E)

Lung Cancer Unit, Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain.

Gina Hollenbeck (G)

ALK Positive, Inc., Worldwide, Memphis, Tennessee.

Keith Kerr (K)

Department of Pathology, Aberdeen University Medical School, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Edward S Kim (ES)

Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.

Clarissa Mathias (C)

Núcleo de Oncologia da Bahia-Oncoclínicas, Salvador Bahia, Brazil.

Jose Pacheco (J)

Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado.

Pieter Postmus (P)

Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands.

Charles Powell (C)

Mount Sinai-National Jewish Health Respiratory Institute, New York, New York.

Masahiro Tsuboi (M)

Department of Dignostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.

Ignacio I Wistuba (II)

Division of Pathology/Lab Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Heather A Wakelee (HA)

Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California.

Chandra P Belani (CP)

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Giorgio V Scagliotti (GV)

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Fred R Hirsch (FR)

Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH