ACC-AHA Diagnostic Criteria for Hypertension in Pregnancy Identifies Patients at Intermediate Risk of Adverse Outcomes.
Adult
American Heart Association
Baltimore
/ epidemiology
Blood Pressure
/ physiology
Cardiology
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced
/ epidemiology
Logistic Models
Multivariate Analysis
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pre-Eclampsia
/ epidemiology
Pregnancy
Premature Birth
/ epidemiology
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
United States
Young Adult
Journal
American journal of perinatology
ISSN: 1098-8785
Titre abrégé: Am J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8405212
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
24
5
2020
medline:
4
1
2022
entrez:
24
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the study is to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients who are normotensive, hypertensive by Stage I American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association (ACC-AHA) criteria, and hypertensive by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) criteria. Secondary analysis of a prospective first trimester cohort study between 2007 and 2010 at three institutions in Baltimore, MD, was conducted. Blood pressure at 11 to 14 weeks' gestation was classified as (1) normotensive (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <130 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] <80 mm Hg); (2) hypertensive by Stage I ACC-AHA criteria (SBP 130-139 mm Hg or DBP 80-89 mm Hg); or (3) hypertensive by ACOG criteria (SBP ≥140 mm Hg or DBP ≥90 mm Hg). Primary outcomes included preeclampsia, small for gestational age (SGA) neonate, and preterm birth. Among 3,422 women enrolled, 2,976 with delivery data from singleton pregnancies of nonanomalous fetuses were included. In total, 20.2% met hypertension criteria (Stage I ACC-AHA Pregnant patients with Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension in the first trimester had higher rates of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and SGA neonates compared with normotensive women. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were numerically lower in the Stage I ACC-AHA group compared with the ACOG group, but these comparisons only reached statistical significance for preterm birth. Optimal pregnancy management for first trimester Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension requires active study. · Women with first trimester American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association (ACC-AHA) Stage I hypertension were more likely to develop preeclampsia, deliver preterm, and deliver a small-for-gestational age neonate than normotensive women.. · Women with first trimester American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) hypertension (consistent with stage II ACC-AHA hypertension) had the highest numeric rate of adverse outcomes; however, compared with Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension, there was only statistically significant difference for preterm delivery.. · The risk profile for pregnant women with Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension and women with hypertension by conventional ACOG criteria may be more similar than previously understood..
Identifiants
pubmed: 32446257
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709465
pmc: PMC8923636
mid: NIHMS1677364
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e249-e255Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K12 HD085845
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR003098
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):2-6
pubmed: 19230611
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Jan;34(2):117-122
pubmed: 27322669
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018;40(6):539-546
pubmed: 29172803
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):68.e1-9
pubmed: 22727352
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;221(3):277.e1-277.e8
pubmed: 31255629
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Feb;294(2):H541-50
pubmed: 18055511
Eur Heart J. 2011 Dec;32(24):3088-97
pubmed: 21821845
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):514.e1-7
pubmed: 24746997
Hypertens Pregnancy. 2016 Aug;35(3):350-60
pubmed: 27003637
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1269-1324
pubmed: 29133354
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16
pubmed: 26551272
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;60(1):206-214
pubmed: 28005588
BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 19;2(4):
pubmed: 22815467
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e53844
pubmed: 23405075
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;45(2):119-29
pubmed: 25627093
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):97-105
pubmed: 23262933
J Hypertens. 2015 Sep;33(9):1860-7; discussion 1867
pubmed: 26147387
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;100(2):369-77
pubmed: 12151166
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;132(4):843-849
pubmed: 30204698
PLoS Med. 2009 Apr 28;6(4):e1000058
pubmed: 19399161
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):1
pubmed: 30575675
BMJ. 2016 Apr 19;353:i1753
pubmed: 27094586
Stat Med. 1985 Jan-Mar;4(1):87-90
pubmed: 3992076
BMJ. 2014 Apr 15;348:g2301
pubmed: 24735917
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224-60
pubmed: 23245609
Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-13
pubmed: 12493255
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2367-8
pubmed: 26061848
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):e26-e50
pubmed: 30575676
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Nov 1;126(5):555-64
pubmed: 984126
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1170-1177
pubmed: 29686009