Harnessing the power of novel animal-free test methods for the development of COVID-19 drugs and vaccines.
Animal Testing Alternatives
Antiviral Agents
/ pharmacology
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
COVID-19 Vaccines
Coronavirus Infections
/ drug therapy
Drug Development
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
/ methods
Drug Repositioning
Humans
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Pneumonia, Viral
/ drug therapy
SARS-CoV-2
Viral Vaccines
Journal
Archives of toxicology
ISSN: 1432-0738
Titre abrégé: Arch Toxicol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0417615
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
29
04
2020
accepted:
18
05
2020
pubmed:
25
5
2020
medline:
24
6
2020
entrez:
25
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The COVID-19-inducing virus, SARS-CoV2, is likely to remain a threat to human health unless efficient drugs or vaccines become available. Given the extent of the current pandemic (people in over one hundred countries infected) and its disastrous effect on world economy (associated with limitations of human rights), speedy drug discovery is critical. In this situation, past investments into the development of new (animal-free) approach methods (NAM) for drug safety, efficacy, and quality evaluation can be leveraged. For this, we provide an overview of repurposing ideas to shortcut drug development times. Animal-based testing would be too lengthy, and it largely fails, when a pathogen is species-specific or if the desired drug is based on specific features of human biology. Fortunately, industry has already largely shifted to NAM, and some public funding programs have advanced the development of animal-free technologies. For instance, NAM can predict genotoxicity (a major aspect of carcinogenicity) within days, human antibodies targeting virus epitopes can be generated in molecular biology laboratories within weeks, and various human cell-based organoids are available to test virus infectivity and the biological processes controlling them. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has formed an expert group to pave the way for the use of such approaches for accelerated drug development. This situation illustrates the importance of diversification in drug discovery strategies and clearly shows the shortcomings of an approach that invests 95% of resources into a single technology (animal experimentation) in the face of challenges that require alternative approaches.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32447523
doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02787-2
pii: 10.1007/s00204-020-02787-2
pmc: PMC7245508
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Viral Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Editorial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2263-2272Subventions
Organisme : Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
ID : 681002
Pays : International
Organisme : Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
ID : 825759
Pays : International
Références
Abreu CM, Gama L, Krasemann S et al (2018) Microglia increase inflammatory responses in iPSC-derived human brain spheres. Front Microbiol 9:2766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02766
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02766
pubmed: 30619100
pmcid: 6296317
Alepee N, Bahinski A, Daneshian M et al (2014) State-of-the-art of 3D cultures (organs-on-a-chip) in safety testing and pathophysiology. Altex 31(4):441–477. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1406111
doi: 10.14573/altex.1406111
pubmed: 25027500
pmcid: 4783151
Almagro JC, Pedraza-Escalona M, Arrieta HI, Perez-Tapia SM (2019) Phage display libraries for antibody therapeutic discovery and development. Antibodies (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antib8030044
doi: 10.3390/antib8030044
Bailey J, Thew M, Balls M (2014) An analysis of the use of animal models in predicting human toxicology and drug safety. Altern Lab Anim 42(3):181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291404200306
doi: 10.1177/026119291404200306
pubmed: 25068930
Bailey J, Thew M, Balls M (2015) Predicting human drug toxicity and safety via animal tests: can any one species predict drug toxicity in any other, and do monkeys help? Altern Lab Anim 43(6):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291504300607
doi: 10.1177/026119291504300607
pubmed: 26753942
Basketter DA, Clewell H, Kimber I et al (2012) A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing. Altex 29(1):3–91. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2012.1.003
doi: 10.14573/altex.2012.1.003
pubmed: 22307314
Beilmann M, Boonen H, Czich A et al (2019) Optimizing drug discovery by investigative toxicology: current and future trends. Altex 36(2):289–313. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1808181
doi: 10.14573/altex.1808181
pubmed: 30570669
Boodman E (2020) Researchers rush to test coronavirus vaccine in people without knowing how well it works in animals. STAT news. https://bit.ly/2xwSDKV . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
Bouhifd M, Andersen ME, Baghdikian C et al (2015) The human toxome project. Altex 32(2):112–124. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1502091
doi: 10.14573/altex.1502091
pubmed: 25742299
pmcid: 4778566
Bruckner T (2020) All COVID-19 clinical trials at a glance. Transparimed. https://bit.ly/2Y2Yumt . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
Busquet F, Kleensang A, Rovida C, Herrmann K, Leist M, Hartung T (2020) New European Union statistics on laboratory animal use—what really counts! Altex 37(2):167–186. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2003241
doi: 10.14573/altex.2003241
pubmed: 32242634
Casadevall A, Pirofski LA (2020) The convalescent sera option for containing COVID-19. J Clin Invest 130(4):1545–1548. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI138003
doi: 10.1172/JCI138003
pubmed: 32167489
Clark M, Steger-Hartmann T (2018) A big data approach to the concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in animals and humans. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 96:94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.04.018
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.04.018
pubmed: 29730448
Cohen J (2020) COVID-19 vaccine protects monkeys from new coronavirus, Chinese biotech reports. Sciencemag. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc4050
doi: 10.1126/science.abc4050
Collins FS, Gray GM, Bucher JR (2008) Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection. Science 319(5865):906–907. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154619
doi: 10.1126/science.1154619
pubmed: 18276874
pmcid: 2679521
Corvi R, Madia F (2017) In vitro genotoxicity testing—can the performance be enhanced? Food Chem Toxicol 106(Pt B):600–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.024
doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.024
pubmed: 27554597
Corvi R, Spielmann H, Hartung T (2019) Alternative approaches for carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity. In: Balls M, Combes R, Worth A (eds) The history of alternative test methods in toxicology (chapter 3.7). Elsevier Academic Press, London, pp 209–218 (eBook ISBN: 9780128136980, Paperback ISBN: 9780128136973)
Cosson P, Hartley O (2016) Recombinant antibodies for academia: a practical approach. Chim (Aarau) 70(12):893–897. https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2016.893
doi: 10.2533/chimia.2016.893
Cupedo T, Stroock A, Coles M (2012) Application of tissue engineering to the immune system: development of artificial lymph nodes. Front Immunol 3:343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00343
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00343
pubmed: 23162557
pmcid: 3499788
Daneshian M, Busquet F, Hartung T, Leist M (2015) Animal use for science in Europe. Altex 32(4):261–274. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1509081
doi: 10.14573/altex.1509081
pubmed: 26536288
Daneshian M, Kamp H, Hengstler J, Leist M, van de Water B (2016) Highlight report: launch of a large integrated European in vitro toxicology project: EU-ToxRisk. Arch Toxicol 90(5):1021–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1698-7
doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1698-7
pubmed: 27017488
pmcid: 4830874
De Mattia F, Chapsal JM, Descamps J et al (2011) The consistency approach for quality control of vaccines—a strategy to improve quality control and implement 3Rs. Biologicals 39(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2010.12.001
doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2010.12.001
pubmed: 21277791
Drake DRI, Singh I, Nguyen MN et al (2012) In vitro biomimetic model of the human immune system for predictive vaccine assessments. Disruptive Sci Technol (Feb). https://doi.org/10.1089/dst.2012.0006
doi: 10.1089/dst.2012.0006
EC Research and Innovation (2020) Coronavirus: EU mobilises €10 million for research. EC.EUROPA.EU. https://bit.ly/3aEU2Na . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
EMA (2019) Guideline on quality, non-clinical and clinical requirements 5 for investigational advanced therapy medicinal products 6 in clinical trials. EMA/CAT/852602/2018. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/draft-guideline-quality-non-clinical-clinical-requirements-investigational-advanced-therapy_en.pdf . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
EMA (2020a) Update on treatments and vaccines against COVID-19 under development. EMA/160083/2020 media and public relations. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/update-treatments-vaccines-against-covid-19-under-development . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
EMA (2020b) EMA regulatory science to 2025. EMA/110706/2020. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/regulatory-procedural-guideline/ema-regulatory-science-2025-strategic-reflection_en.pdf . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
EPA (2019) Administrator wheeler signs memo to reduce animal testing, awards $4.25 million to advance research on alternative methods to animal testing. EPA news releases. https://bit.ly/2y29ENz . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
Escher SE, Kamp H, Bennekou SH et al (2019) Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project. Arch Toxicol 93(12):3643–3667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02591-7
doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02591-7
pubmed: 31781791
Eskes C, Whelan M (2016) Introduction. Adv Exp Med Biol 856:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33826-2_1
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-33826-2_1
pubmed: 27671717
Ewart L, Dehne EM, Fabre K et al (2018) Application of microphysiological systems to enhance safety assessment in drug discovery. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 58:65–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052722
doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052722
pubmed: 29029591
FDA (2017) FDA’s predictive toxicology roadmap. FDA website. https://bit.ly/3bCU1e4 . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
Gao Q, Bao L, Mao H et al (2020) Rapid development of an inactivated vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. Biorxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.046375
doi: 10.1101/2020.04.17.046375
pubmed: 32511412
pmcid: 7263559
Giese C, Marx U (2014) Human immunity in vitro—solving immunogenicity and more. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 69–70:103–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.12.011
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.12.011
pubmed: 24447895
Giese C, Demmler CD, Ammer R et al (2006) A human lymph node in vitro–challenges and progress. Artif Organs 30(10):803–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00303.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00303.x
pubmed: 17026580
Goh J-Y, Weaver RJ, Dixon L, Platt NJ, Roberts RA (2015) Development and use of in vitro alternatives to animal testing by the pharmaceutical industry 1980–2013. Toxicol Res 4(5):1297–1307. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TX00123D
doi: 10.1039/C5TX00123D
Gordon S, Daneshian M, Bouwstra J et al (2015) Non-animal models of epithelial barriers (skin, intestine and lung) in research, industrial applications and regulatory toxicology. Altex 32(4):327–378. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1510051
doi: 10.14573/altex.1510051
pubmed: 26536291
Graepel R, Ter Braak B, Escher SE et al (2019) Paradigm shift in safety assessment using new approach methods: the EU-ToxRisk strategy. Curr Opin Pharmacol 15:33–39
Gray AC, Sidhu SS, Chandrasekera PC, Hendriksen CFM, Borrebaeck CAK (2016) Animal-friendly affinity reagents: replacing the needless in the haystack. Trends Biotechnol 34(12):960–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.017
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.017
pubmed: 27450382
Hamm J, Sullivan K, Clippinger AJ et al (2017) Alternative approaches for identifying acute systemic toxicity: moving from research to regulatory testing. Toxicol In Vitro 41:245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2017.01.004
doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.01.004
pubmed: 28069485
pmcid: 5479748
Hartung T, Leist M (2008) Food for thought … on the evolution of toxicology and the phasing out of animal testing. Altex 25(2):91–102. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2008.2.91
doi: 10.14573/altex.2008.2.91
pubmed: 18551232
Hartung T, Zurlo J (2012) Alternative approaches for medical countermeasures to biological and chemical terrorism and warfare. Altex 29:251–260
doi: 10.14573/altex.2012.3.251
Hernandez LG, van Steeg H, Luijten M, van Benthem J (2009) Mechanisms of non-genotoxic carcinogens and importance of a weight of evidence approach. Mutat Res 682(2–3):94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.07.002
pubmed: 19631282
ICH (2020) Detection of reproductive and developmental toxicity for human pharmaceuticals S5 (R3). ICH harmonised guideline. https://bit.ly/3aDR7EH . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
ICMRA (2020) Summary report: global regulatory workshop on COVID-19 vaccine development. IMCRA. https://bit.ly/3bQEOGg . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
IMI (2020) IMI planning EUR 45 million call for proposals on COVID-19. IMI newsroom. https://bit.ly/2YatQaL . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
Jacobs MN, Colacci A, Louekari K et al (2016) International regulatory needs for development of an IATA for non-genotoxic carcinogenic chemical substances. Altex 33(4):359–392. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1601201
doi: 10.14573/altex.1601201
pubmed: 27120445
JHSPH (2020) Infectious disease experts recommend using antibodies from COVID-19 survivors as stopgap measure to treat patients and protect healthcare workers. JHSPH news. https://bit.ly/2Y8con9 . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
Kranaster P, Karreman C, Dold J et al (2020) Time and space-resolved quantification of plasma membrane sialylation for measurements of cell function and neurotoxicity. Arch Toxicol 94(2):449–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02642-z
doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02642-z
pubmed: 31828357
Kretzschmar E, Muckenfuss H, Pfleiderer M (2018) Official batch control of influenza vaccines: is it still useful? Vaccine 36(17):2364–2370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.078
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.078
pubmed: 29580639
Krewski D, Acosta D Jr, Andersen M et al (2010) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 13(2–4):51–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2010.483176
doi: 10.1080/10937404.2010.483176
pubmed: 20574894
pmcid: 4410863
Krewski D, Andersen M, Tyshenko MG et al (2020) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: progress in the past decade and future perspectives. Arch Toxicol 94:1–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02613-4
doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02613-4
pubmed: 31848664
Le Thanh T, Andreadakis Z, Kumar A et al (2020) The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat Rev Drug Discov. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5
doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5
Leist M, Hartung T (2013) Inflammatory findings on species extrapolations: humans are definitely no 70-kg mice. Arch Toxicol 87(4):563–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-013-1038-0
doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1038-0
pubmed: 23503654
pmcid: 3604596
Leist M, Hartung T, Nicotera P (2008) The dawning of a new age of toxicology. Altex 25(2):103–114
doi: 10.14573/altex.2008.2.103
Leist M, Hasiwa N, Rovida C et al (2014) Consensus report on the future of animal-free systemic toxicity testing. Altex 31(3):341–356. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1406091
doi: 10.14573/altex.1406091
pubmed: 25061899
Marx U, Andersson TB, Bahinski A et al (2016) Biology-inspired microphysiological system approaches to solve the prediction dilemma of substance testing. Altex 33(3):272–321. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1603161
doi: 10.14573/altex.1603161
pubmed: 27180100
pmcid: 5396467
Marx U, Akabane T, Andersson TB et al (2020) Biology-inspired microphysiological systems to advance patient benefit and animal welfare in drug development. Altex. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2001241
doi: 10.14573/altex.2001241
pubmed: 32113184
McCray PB Jr, Pewe L, Wohlford-Lenane C et al (2007) Lethal infection of K18-hACE2 mice infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol 81(2):813–821. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02012-06
doi: 10.1128/JVI.02012-06
pubmed: 17079315
Meigs L, Smirnova L, Rovida C, Leist M, Hartung T (2018) Animal testing and its alternatives—the most important omics is economics. Altex 35(3):275–305. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1807041
doi: 10.14573/altex.1807041
pubmed: 30008008
Monteil V, Kwon H, Prado P et al (2020) Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infections in engineered human tissues using clinical-grade soluble human ACE2. Cell J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.004
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.004
Monticello TM, Jones TW, Dambach DM et al (2017) Current nonclinical testing paradigm enables safe entry to First-In-Human clinical trials: the IQ consortium nonclinical to clinical translational database. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 334:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2017.09.006
doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2017.09.006
pubmed: 28893587
Murphy T (2020) Why researchers think HIV meds might work against COVID-19. The body pro. https://bit.ly/354VwPG . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
NAS (2011) Chimpanzees in Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Assessing the Necessity. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee on the Use of Chimpanzees in Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Washington (DC)
NRC (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/11970
NRC (2011) Animal models for assessing countermeasures to bioterrorism agents. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/13233
Olson H, Betton G, Robinson D et al (2000) Concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans and in animals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 32(1):56–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.2000.1399
doi: 10.1006/rtph.2000.1399
pubmed: 11029269
Park SS (2019) Post-glycosylation modification of sialic acid and its role in virus pathogenesis. Vaccines (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines7040171
doi: 10.3390/vaccines7040171
pmcid: 6963739
Parsons LM, Bouwman KM, Azurmendi H, de Vries RP, Cipollo JF, Verheije MH (2019) Glycosylation of the viral attachment protein of avian coronavirus is essential for host cell and receptor binding. J Biol Chem 294(19):7797–7809. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.007532
doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007532
pubmed: 30902814
pmcid: 6514631
Pinero J, Furlong LI, Sanz F (2018) In silico models in drug development: where we are. Curr Opin Pharmacol 42:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2018.08.007
doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2018.08.007
pubmed: 30205360
Roberts M (2020) Coronavirus: US volunteers test first vaccine. BBC news. https://bbc.in/33XZFnY . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
Sanchez-Schmitz G, Stevens CR, Bettencourt IA et al (2018) Microphysiologic human tissue constructs reproduce autologous age-specific BCG and HBV primary immunization in vitro. Front Immunol 9:2634. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02634
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02634
pubmed: 30524426
pmcid: 6256288
Sewell F, Edwards J, Prior H, Robinson S (2016) Opportunities to apply the 3Rs in safety assessment programs. ILAR J 57(2):234–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilw024
doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilw024
pubmed: 28053076
pmcid: 5886346
Siramshetty VB, Nickel J, Omieczynski C, Gohlke BO, Drwal MN, Preissner R (2016) WITHDRAWN—a resource for withdrawn and discontinued drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1):D1080–D1086. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1192
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1192
pubmed: 26553801
Strickland J, Clippinger AJ, Brown J et al (2018) Status of acute systemic toxicity testing requirements and data uses by U.S. regulatory agencies. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 94:183–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.022
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.022
pubmed: 29408321
pmcid: 5878133
Suematsu S, Watanabe T (2004) Generation of a synthetic lymphoid tissue-like organoid in mice. Nat Biotechnol 22(12):1539–1545. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1039
doi: 10.1038/nbt1039
pubmed: 15568019
Tamaki C, Nagayama T, Hashiba M et al (2013) Potentials and limitations of nonclinical safety assessment for predicting clinical adverse drug reactions: correlation analysis of 142 approved drugs in Japan. J Toxicol Sci 38(4):581–598. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.38.581
doi: 10.2131/jts.38.581
pubmed: 23824014
Thomas RS, Paules RS, Simeonov A et al (2018) The US federal Tox21 program: a strategic and operational plan for continued leadership. Altex 35(2):163–168. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1803011
doi: 10.14573/altex.1803011
pubmed: 29529324
pmcid: 6664816
Tice RR, Austin CP, Kavlock RJ, Bucher JR (2013) Improving the human hazard characterization of chemicals: a Tox21 update. Environ Health Perspect 121(7):756–765. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205784
doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205784
pubmed: 23603828
pmcid: 3701992
Tortorici MA, Walls AC, Lang Y et al (2019) Structural basis for human coronavirus attachment to sialic acid receptors. Nat Struct Mol Biol 26(6):481–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0233-y
doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0233-y
pubmed: 31160783
pmcid: 6554059
Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P et al (2019) Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18(6):463–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5
doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5
pubmed: 30976107
pmcid: 6552674
Wheaton S (2020) Von der Leyen hopes for vaccine by ‘autumn,’ defying expert predictions. Politico. https://politi.co/39rIAUR . Accessed 26 Apr 2020
WHO (2003) WHO expert committee on biological standardization: fifty-fourth report. WHO technical report series 927 (ISBN 92 4 120927 5)
Zuang V, Dura A, Asturiol Bofill D, et al (2019) EURL ECVAM status report on the development, validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative methods and approaches. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/25602JRC119292 (ISBN 978-92-76-16368-8)