A comparative study of remote sensing classification methods for monitoring and assessing desert vegetation using a UAV-based multispectral sensor.

Classification methods Desert ecosystems Multispectral imagery Spectral vegetation indices UAVs

Journal

Environmental monitoring and assessment
ISSN: 1573-2959
Titre abrégé: Environ Monit Assess
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8508350

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 May 2020
Historique:
received: 31 08 2019
accepted: 29 04 2020
entrez: 25 5 2020
pubmed: 25 5 2020
medline: 5 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Restoration programs require long-term monitoring and assessment of vegetation growth and productivity. Remote sensing technology is considered to be one of the most powerful technologies for assessing vegetation. However, several limitations have been observed with regard to the use of satellite imagery, especially in drylands, due to the special structure of desert plants. Therefore, this study was conducted in Kuwait's Al Abdali protected area, which is dominated by a Rhanterium epapposum community. This work aimed to determine whether Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) multispectral imagery could eliminate the challenges associated with satellite imagery by examining the vegetation indices and classification methods for very high multispectral resolution imagery using UAVs. The results showed that the transformed difference vegetation index (TDVI) performed better with arid shrubs and grasses than did the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). It was found that the NDVI underestimated the vegetation coverage, especially in locations with high vegetation coverage. It was also found that Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) classifiers demonstrated a higher accuracy, with a significant overall accuracy of 93% and a kappa coefficient of 0.89. Therefore, we concluded that SVM and ML are the best classifiers for assessing desert vegetation and the use of UAVs with multispectral sensors can eliminate some of the major limitations associated with satellite imagery, particularly when dealing with tiny plants such as native desert vegetation. We also believe that these methods are suitable for the purpose of assessing vegetation coverage to support revegetation and restoration programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32447581
doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08330-1
pii: 10.1007/s10661-020-08330-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

389

Auteurs

Z M Al-Ali (ZM)

Natural Environmental Systems and Technologies (NEST) Research Group, Ecolife Sciences Research and Consultation, Hawally, Kuwait. zahraamma84@gmail.com.

M M Abdullah (MM)

Natural Environmental Systems and Technologies (NEST) Research Group, Ecolife Sciences Research and Consultation, Hawally, Kuwait.
Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.

N B Asadalla (NB)

Natural Environmental Systems and Technologies (NEST) Research Group, Ecolife Sciences Research and Consultation, Hawally, Kuwait.
Public Authority of Agriculture Affairs and Fish Resources (PAAF), Al Rabya, Kuwait.

M Gholoum (M)

Department of Science, College of Basic Education, The Public Authority of Applied Education and Training, Adailiya, Kuwait.

Articles similaires

India Carbon Sequestration Environmental Monitoring Carbon Biomass
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals
1.00
Iran Environmental Monitoring Seasons Ecosystem Forests
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal

Classifications MeSH