Predictors of zero X ray procedures in supraventricular arrhythmias ablation.
Action Potentials
Adult
Aged
Atrial Flutter
/ diagnostic imaging
Catheter Ablation
/ adverse effects
Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac
Female
Fluoroscopy
Heart Rate
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Exposure
/ adverse effects
Patient Safety
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Exposure
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry
/ diagnostic imaging
Tachycardia, Supraventricular
/ diagnostic imaging
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ablation
No X-ray
Radiological dose
Supraventricular tachycardia
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
20
09
2019
accepted:
14
05
2020
pubmed:
25
5
2020
medline:
6
10
2020
entrez:
25
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate predictors of zero-X ray procedures for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVT) using minimally fluoroscopic approach (MFA). Patients referred for RF catheter ablation of SVT were admitted for a MFA with an electro-anatomical navigation system or a conventional fluoroscopic approach (ConvA). Exclusion criterion was the need to perform a transseptal puncture. 206 patients (98 men, age 53 ± 19 years) underwent an EP study, 93 (45%) with an MFA and 113 (55%) with a ConvA. Fifty-five had no inducible arrhythmias (EPS). Fifty-four had AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 49 patients had typical atrial flutter (AFL), 37 had AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT/WPW), 11 had focal atrial tachycardia (AT), and underwent a RF ablation. X-ray was not used at all in 51/93 (58%) procedures (zero X ray). MFA was associated with a significant reduction in total fluoroscopy time (5.5 ± 10 vs 13 ± 18 min, P = 0.01) and operator radiation dose (0.8 ± 2.5 vs 3 ± 8.2 mSV, P < 0.05). The greatest absolute dose reduction was observed in AVNRT (0.1 ± 0.3 vs 5.1 ± 10 mSV, P = 0.01, 98% relative dose reduction) and in AFL (1.3 ± 3.6 vs 11 ± 16 mSV, P = 0.003, 88% relative dose reduction) groups. Both AVNRT or AFL resulted the only statistically significant predictors of zero x ray at multivariate analysis (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.5-13 and OR 5, 95% CI 1.7-15, P < 0.001, respectively). Success and complication rate was comparable between groups (P = NS). Using MFA for SVT ablation, radiological exposure is significantly reduced. Type of arrhythmia is the strongest predictor of zero X ray procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32447632
doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01884-8
pii: 10.1007/s10554-020-01884-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM