Medicinal plant use practice in four ethnic communities (Gurage, Mareqo, Qebena, and Silti), south central Ethiopia.
Culture
Ethnic groups
Gurage
Mareqo
Medicinal plants
Qebena
Silti
Traditional knowledge
Journal
Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine
ISSN: 1746-4269
Titre abrégé: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245794
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 May 2020
24 May 2020
Historique:
received:
06
01
2020
accepted:
05
05
2020
entrez:
26
5
2020
pubmed:
26
5
2020
medline:
18
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ethnic groups throughout the world have developed their own cultures expressed in the form of customs, taboos, and traditional healthcare systems. Traditional medicine system is one of the widespread cultures known throughout the world which is very much tied to cultural practices of the community or ethnic group. Medicinal plant treasure found in Gurage and Silti zones remained poorly characterized and understood. Therefore, this study was conducted in four ethnic groups: three from Gurage zone (Gurage, Qebena, and Mareqo) and one from Silti zone (Silti) which have lived in close proximity and contact for many centuries in the respective zones. In the present study, unique and shared cultural elements in connection to traditional herbal medicine were examined through investigation of the diversity of medicinal plants. Moreover, attempts have been made to determine similarities among the society in the medicinal plants they have used in general and in medicinal plant species considered culturally most important. In a study that involved 320 randomly sampled informants, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation were used and qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Descriptive statistics, rank order priority (ROP), informant consensus factor, Jaccard similarity coefficient, and clustering were used for data analysis. A total of 244 medicinal plant species and a fungal species used to treat human and/or livestock ailments were documented. The number of plants (80 plants, 33 %) with ROP value greater than 50% were considerably fewer than that of plants with ROP < 50% (164, 67 %). Jaccard similarity index and clustering analysis for all cited plants, among the respective studied districts, indicated that grouping generally followed the existing ethnic origin. On the contrary, clustering based on culturally important medicinal plant species (80 plant species, score ROP ≥ 50%) showed the influence of proximity and geographical orientation rather than ethnic relation. Culturally, most important plants (80 spp.) are widely used and best shared with nearby communities and this could imply current (new) knowledge being practiced in the communities. This knowledge must be documented and better utilized in a modern way including modernized use of traditional medicinal plants.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Ethnic groups throughout the world have developed their own cultures expressed in the form of customs, taboos, and traditional healthcare systems. Traditional medicine system is one of the widespread cultures known throughout the world which is very much tied to cultural practices of the community or ethnic group. Medicinal plant treasure found in Gurage and Silti zones remained poorly characterized and understood. Therefore, this study was conducted in four ethnic groups: three from Gurage zone (Gurage, Qebena, and Mareqo) and one from Silti zone (Silti) which have lived in close proximity and contact for many centuries in the respective zones. In the present study, unique and shared cultural elements in connection to traditional herbal medicine were examined through investigation of the diversity of medicinal plants. Moreover, attempts have been made to determine similarities among the society in the medicinal plants they have used in general and in medicinal plant species considered culturally most important.
METHODS
METHODS
In a study that involved 320 randomly sampled informants, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation were used and qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Descriptive statistics, rank order priority (ROP), informant consensus factor, Jaccard similarity coefficient, and clustering were used for data analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 244 medicinal plant species and a fungal species used to treat human and/or livestock ailments were documented. The number of plants (80 plants, 33 %) with ROP value greater than 50% were considerably fewer than that of plants with ROP < 50% (164, 67 %). Jaccard similarity index and clustering analysis for all cited plants, among the respective studied districts, indicated that grouping generally followed the existing ethnic origin. On the contrary, clustering based on culturally important medicinal plant species (80 plant species, score ROP ≥ 50%) showed the influence of proximity and geographical orientation rather than ethnic relation.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Culturally, most important plants (80 spp.) are widely used and best shared with nearby communities and this could imply current (new) knowledge being practiced in the communities. This knowledge must be documented and better utilized in a modern way including modernized use of traditional medicinal plants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32448337
doi: 10.1186/s13002-020-00377-1
pii: 10.1186/s13002-020-00377-1
pmc: PMC7245860
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27Références
J Ethnopharmacol. 1999 Oct;67(1):15-25
pubmed: 10616956
J Ethnopharmacol. 1986 Jun;16(2-3):275-87
pubmed: 3747566
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009 Oct 12;5:28
pubmed: 19821994
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Mar 14;3:12
pubmed: 17355645
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Oct 15;3:33
pubmed: 17937791
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Aug 28;9(1):63
pubmed: 23984919
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 May 30;3:23
pubmed: 17537240
J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Sep 15;173:139-56
pubmed: 26165826
J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Feb 23;161:116-27
pubmed: 25499311
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Apr;82(4):243-50
pubmed: 15259252
J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;151(1):517-27
pubmed: 24247077
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011 Feb 01;7:8
pubmed: 21284847
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Dec;47(11):1859-71
pubmed: 9877354
Nature. 2015 Feb 26;518(7540):487-8
pubmed: 25719661
J Ethnopharmacol. 1995 Nov 3;48(3):131-44
pubmed: 8719974
J Ethnopharmacol. 2000 Jun;70(3):235-73
pubmed: 10837988
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014 Jun 04;10:46
pubmed: 24898079