Multicentric study of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus testing and assessment of triage methods in Latin America: the ESTAMPA screening study protocol.
colposcopy
gynaecological oncology
molecular diagnostics
preventive medicine
public health
risk management
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 05 2020
24 05 2020
Historique:
entrez:
26
5
2020
pubmed:
26
5
2020
medline:
18
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is replacing cytology in primary screening. Its limited specificity demands using a second (triage) test to better identify women at high-risk of cervical disease. Cytology represents the immediate triage but its low sensitivity might hamper HPV testing sensitivity, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where cytology performance has been suboptimal. The ESTAMPA (EStudio multicéntrico de TAMizaje y triaje de cáncer de cuello uterino con pruebas del virus del PApiloma humano; Spanish acronym) study will: (1) evaluate the performance of different triage techniques to detect cervical precancer and (2) inform on how to implement HPV-based screening programmes in LMIC. Women aged 30-64 years are screened with HPV testing and Pap across 12 study centres in Latin America. Screened positives have colposcopy with biopsy and treatment of lesions. Women with no evident disease are recalled 18 months later for another HPV test; those HPV-positive undergo colposcopy with biopsy and treatment as needed. Biological specimens are collected in different visits for triage testing, which is not used for clinical management. The study outcome is histological high-grade squamous intraepithelial or worse lesions (HSIL+) under the lower anogenital squamous terminology. About 50 000 women will be screened and 500 HSIL+ cases detected (at initial and 18 months screening). Performance measures (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) of triage techniques to detect HSIL+ will be estimated and compared with adjustment by age and study centre. The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), of the Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) and by those in each participating centre. A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has been established to monitor progress of the study, assure participant safety, advice on scientific conduct and analysis and suggest protocol improvements. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings. NCT01881659.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32448795
pii: bmjopen-2019-035796
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035796
pmc: PMC7252979
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01881659']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e035796Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UH3 CA202730
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMJ. 2018 Dec 5;363:k4823
pubmed: 30518635
Int J Cancer. 2012 Feb 1;130(3):602-10
pubmed: 21400507
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Nov 21;104(22):1738-49
pubmed: 23093560
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0115355
pubmed: 25635965
Cancer Biol Ther. 2011 Feb 1;11(3):295-306
pubmed: 21239888
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Oct;136(10):1266-97
pubmed: 22742517
Biometrics. 1987 Mar;43(1):207-11
pubmed: 3567305
Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Jan;143(2):225-41
pubmed: 24877975
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;205(6):569.e1-7
pubmed: 21903190
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan 07;107(2):
pubmed: 25568167
Cancer Cytopathol. 2015 Dec;123(12):745-54
pubmed: 26230283
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Apr 4;104(7):556-65
pubmed: 22448030
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Nov 1;110(11):1222-1228
pubmed: 29659930
Int J Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;141(4):701-710
pubmed: 28500655
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 May;109(2):100-4
pubmed: 20152973
BMC Cancer. 2019 Apr 23;19(1):367
pubmed: 31014287
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Sep;138(9):1182-5
pubmed: 25171700
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 May-Jun;62(3):147-72
pubmed: 22422631
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Nov;28(11):1816-1824
pubmed: 31488417
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):881-888
pubmed: 31081870
BJOG. 2010 Aug;117(9):1067-73
pubmed: 20604775
Future Microbiol. 2011 Sep;6(9):1083-98
pubmed: 21958146
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Feb;112(2):293-9
pubmed: 19054549
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Dec;48(12):4646-8
pubmed: 20926711
Int J Cancer. 2008 Jul 1;123(1):153-60
pubmed: 18404671
Int J Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;145(8):2042-2050
pubmed: 30684396
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Aug;28(8):1388-1394
pubmed: 31101617
Int J Cancer. 2014 Jun 15;134(12):2902-9
pubmed: 24272364
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):261-267
pubmed: 28953116
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):167-77
pubmed: 18165406
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Oct;9(10):937-45
pubmed: 18783988
JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1757-64
pubmed: 19861667
Lancet. 2007 Aug 4;370(9585):398-406
pubmed: 17679017
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):813-822
pubmed: 29524206
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):252-8
pubmed: 26868062
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jul;20(7):1398-409
pubmed: 21602310
Int J Cancer. 2007 Aug 15;121(4):796-802
pubmed: 17437272
BMC Cancer. 2015 May 19;15:418
pubmed: 25985991
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jun;285(6):1731-6
pubmed: 22262492
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203
pubmed: 31812369
Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 May;35(3):210-20
pubmed: 19261387
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):315-24
pubmed: 20157096
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 09;5:CD009069
pubmed: 29740819
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 23;13(7):e0201262
pubmed: 30036381