Dynamics in treatment response and disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with focus on BRAF status and primary tumor location: analysis of untreated RAS-wild-type mCRC patients receiving FOLFOXIRI either with or without panitumumab in the VOLFI trial (AIO KRK0109).
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Camptothecin
/ administration & dosage
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Disease Progression
Female
Fluorouracil
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Leucovorin
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Mutation
Neoplasm Metastasis
Organoplatinum Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Panitumumab
/ administration & dosage
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
/ genetics
Treatment Outcome
ras Proteins
/ genetics
BRAF
Combination chemotherapy
Depth of response
Disease dynamics
Early tumor shrinkage
Metastatic colorectal cancer
Primary tumor site
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
15
04
2020
accepted:
12
05
2020
pubmed:
26
5
2020
medline:
17
9
2020
entrez:
26
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In mCRC, disease dynamics may play a critical role in the understanding of long-term outcome. We evaluated depth of response (DpR), time to DpR, and post-DpR survival as relevant endpoints. We analyzed DpR by central review of computer tomography images (change from baseline to smallest tumor diameter), early tumor shrinkage (≥ 20% reduction in tumor diameter at first reassessment), time to DpR (study randomization to DpR-image), post-DpR progression-free survival (pPFS = DpR-image to tumor progression or death), and post-DpR overall survival (pOS = DpR-image to death) with special focus on BRAF status in 66 patients and primary tumor site in 86 patients treated within the VOLFI-trial, respectively. BRAF wild-type (BRAF-WT) compared to BRAF mutant (BRAF-MT) patients had greater DpR (- 57.6% vs. - 40.8%, p = 0.013) with a comparable time to DpR [4.0 (95% CI 3.1-4.4) vs. 3.9 (95% CI 2.5-5.5) months; p = 0.8852]. pPFS was 6.5 (95% CI 4.9-8.0) versus 2.6 (95% CI 1.2-4.0) months in favor of BRAF-WT patients (HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.11-0.53); p < 0.001). This transferred into a significant difference in pOS [33.6 (95% CI 26.0-41.3) vs. 5.4 (95% CI 5.0-5.9) months; HR 0.27 (95% CI 0.13-0.55); p < 0.001]. Similar observations were made for patients stratified for primary tumor site. BRAF-MT patients derive a less profound treatment response compared to BRAF-WT patients. The difference in outcome according to BRAF status is evident after achievement of DpR with BRAF-MT patients hardly deriving any further disease control beyond DpR. Our observations hint towards an aggressive tumor evolution in BRAF-MT tumors, which may already be molecularly detectable at the time of DpR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32449003
doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03257-z
pii: 10.1007/s00432-020-03257-z
pmc: PMC7467910
doi:
Substances chimiques
Organoplatinum Compounds
0
Panitumumab
6A901E312A
BRAF protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
EC 2.7.11.1
ras Proteins
EC 3.6.5.2
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Camptothecin
XT3Z54Z28A
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2681-2691Références
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jan;70:87-98
pubmed: 27907852
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1426-1434
pubmed: 27575024
Cancer Discov. 2018 Apr;8(4):417-427
pubmed: 29431697
Br J Cancer. 2018 Aug;119(3):303-312
pubmed: 30013091
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 1;29(31):4199-204
pubmed: 21969501
BMJ. 2000 Sep 30;321(7264):805-8
pubmed: 11009523
Drugs R D. 2019 Sep;19(3):267-275
pubmed: 31300973
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 20;28(3):466-74
pubmed: 20008640
Cancer Sci. 2013 Jun;104(6):718-24
pubmed: 23480146
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1713-1729
pubmed: 28407110
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;27(7):2389-2401
pubmed: 32172334
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):497-507
pubmed: 32164906
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1065-75
pubmed: 25088940
Ann Oncol. 2009 Aug;20(8):1375-82
pubmed: 19465422
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Dec;6(6):660-7
pubmed: 26697199
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):738-746
pubmed: 27108243
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(14):1927-36
pubmed: 26188850
Nature. 2012 Jan 26;483(7387):100-3
pubmed: 22281684
Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):562-568
pubmed: 27993800
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jul;51(10):1231-42
pubmed: 25956209
Anticancer Drugs. 2014 Feb;25(2):212-8
pubmed: 24201305
Int J Cancer. 2017 Apr 15;140(8):1918-1925
pubmed: 28032641
Cancer. 2011 Oct 15;117(20):4623-32
pubmed: 21456008
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1306-15
pubmed: 26338525
Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun;52(5):956-62
pubmed: 23244709
Cancer Discov. 2015 Apr;5(4):358-67
pubmed: 25673644
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1632-1643
pubmed: 31566309
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;37(1):22-32
pubmed: 30388045
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 20;31(30):3764-75
pubmed: 24043732
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):773-779
pubmed: 29355075
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1188-1194
pubmed: 25712456
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1386-422
pubmed: 27380959
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Mar;20(3):648-55
pubmed: 26573851
Cancer Discov. 2012 Mar;2(3):227-35
pubmed: 22448344
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3401-3411
pubmed: 31609637
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 12;369(11):1023-34
pubmed: 24024839