Do callous-unemotional traits moderate the effects of the juvenile justice system on later offending behavior?
Callous-unemotional (CU) traits
formal processing
juvenile justice system
recidivism
treatment
Journal
Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines
ISSN: 1469-7610
Titre abrégé: J Child Psychol Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0375361
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
accepted:
24
04
2020
pubmed:
26
5
2020
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
26
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Research suggests that callous-unemotional (CU) traits, a recent addition to psychiatric classification of serious conduct problems, may moderate the influence of a number of contextual factors (e.g., parenting, deviant peer influence) on an adolescent's adjustment. The current study sought to replicate past research showing that formal processing through the juvenile justice system increases recidivism and tested the novel hypothesis that CU traits would moderate the relationship between processing decision and future antisocial behavior. A diverse sample of first-time male offenders (N = 1,216; M age = 15.12, SD = 1.29) in three regions of the United States was assessed within 6 weeks of their first arrest and then at 6-month intervals for 36 months. Compared to those who were informally processed (i.e., diverted), adolescents formally processed through the court were at a higher risk of self-reported offending and rearrests as measured by official records, after controlling for preexisting risk factors. However, baseline CU traits moderated this association such that those with high CU traits reported offending at high rates across the subsequent three years regardless of how the juvenile justice system processed their case. CU traits are important to psychiatric classification for designating a subgroup of antisocial youth who may respond differently to contextual influences, including being less susceptible to the negative effects of juvenile justice system involvement. The public health significance of this moderation is significant by suggesting that previous estimates of the harmful impact of formal processing by the juvenile justice system may underestimate its impact, given that the majority of arrested adolescents have normative levels of CU traits.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Research suggests that callous-unemotional (CU) traits, a recent addition to psychiatric classification of serious conduct problems, may moderate the influence of a number of contextual factors (e.g., parenting, deviant peer influence) on an adolescent's adjustment. The current study sought to replicate past research showing that formal processing through the juvenile justice system increases recidivism and tested the novel hypothesis that CU traits would moderate the relationship between processing decision and future antisocial behavior.
METHODS
A diverse sample of first-time male offenders (N = 1,216; M age = 15.12, SD = 1.29) in three regions of the United States was assessed within 6 weeks of their first arrest and then at 6-month intervals for 36 months.
RESULTS
Compared to those who were informally processed (i.e., diverted), adolescents formally processed through the court were at a higher risk of self-reported offending and rearrests as measured by official records, after controlling for preexisting risk factors. However, baseline CU traits moderated this association such that those with high CU traits reported offending at high rates across the subsequent three years regardless of how the juvenile justice system processed their case.
CONCLUSIONS
CU traits are important to psychiatric classification for designating a subgroup of antisocial youth who may respond differently to contextual influences, including being less susceptible to the negative effects of juvenile justice system involvement. The public health significance of this moderation is significant by suggesting that previous estimates of the harmful impact of formal processing by the juvenile justice system may underestimate its impact, given that the majority of arrested adolescents have normative levels of CU traits.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
212-222Informations de copyright
© 2020 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
Références
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Beck, A.J., Rantala, R.R., & U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2016). Sexual Victimization Reported by Juvenile Correctional Authorities, 2007-12.
Blair, R.J., Leibenluft, E., & Pine, D.S. (2014). Conduct disorder and callous-unemotional traits in youth. New England Journal of Medicine, 371, 2207-2216.
Cardinale, E.M., & Marsh, A.A. (2017). The reliability and validity of the Inventory of Callous Unemotional Traits: A meta-analytic review. Assessment, 27:57-71.
Dishion, T.J., Poulin, F., & Burraston, B. (2001). Peer group dynamics associated with iatrogenic effects in group interventions with high-risk young adolescents. In C. Erdley & D.W. Nangle (Eds.), Damon's new directions in child development: The role of friendship in psychological adjustment (pp. 79-92). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ebner, K., & Singewald, N. (2017). Individual differences in stress susceptibility and stress inhibitory mechanisms. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 14, 54-64.
Edens, J.F., Skopp, N.A., & Cahill, M.A. (2008). Psychopathic features moderate the relationship between harsh and inconsistent parental discipline and adolescent antisocial behavior. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 472-476.
Frick, P.J. (2012). Developmental pathways to conduct disorder: Implications for future directions in research, assessment, and treatment. Journal of clinical child & adolescent psychology, 41, 378-389.
Frick, P.J., Ray, J.V., Thornton, L.C., & Kahn, R.E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1-57.
Gatti, U., Tremblay, R.E., & Vitaro, F. (2009). Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 50, 991-998.
Hawes, D.J., Price, M.J., & Dadds, M.R. (2014). Callous-unemotional traits and the treatment of conduct problems in childhood and adolescence: A comprehensive review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 17, 248-267.
Huizinga, D., Esbensen, F.A., & Weiher, A.W. (1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency? The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 82, 83-118.
Kahn, R.E., Byrd, A.L., & Pardini, D.A. (2013). Callous-unemotional traits robustly predict future criminal offending in young men. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 87-97.
Kerr, M., Van Zalk, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Psychopathic traits moderate peer influence on adolescent delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 826-835.
Kimonis, E.R., Frick, P.J., Skeem, J., Marsee, M.A., Cruise, K., Muñoz, L.C., & Morris, A.S. (2008). Assessing callous-unemotional traits in adolescent offenders: Validation of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. Journal of the International Association of Psychiatry and Law, 31, 241-251.
Loughran, T.A., Mulvey, E.P., Schubert, C.A., Fagan, J., Piquero, A.R., & Losoya, S.H. (2009). Estimating a dose-response relationship between length of stay and future recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 47, 699-740.
Matsueda, R.L. (1992). Reflected appraisal, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1577-1611.
Monahan, K.C., & Piquero, A.R. (2009). Investigating the longitudinal relation between offending frequency and offending variety. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 653-673.
Petitclerc, A., Gatti, U., Vitaro, F., & Tremblay, R.E. (2013). Effects of juvenile court exposure on crime in young adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 291-297.
Ray, J.V., Frick, P.J., Thornton, L.C., Wall Myers, T.D., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2017). Callous-unemotional traits predict self-reported offending in adolescent boys: The mediating role of delinquent peers and the moderating role of parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 53, 319-328.
Reed, G.M., First, M.B., Kogan, C.S., Hyman, S.E., Gureje, O., Gaebel, W., 2019). Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Psychiatry, 18, 3-19.
Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S. (1999). Systematic social observation on public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603-651.
Sexton, T., & Alexander, J. (1999). Functional family therapy: Principles of clinical intervention, assessment and implementation. Henderson, NV: RCH Enterprises.
Skogan, W.G. (1977). Dimensions of the dark figure of unreported crime. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 41-50.
Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S.D., Dornbusch, S.M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266-1281.
Thornberry, T., & Krohn, M. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. Criminal Justice, 4, 33-83.
Thornberry, T.P., Krohn, M.D., Lizotte, A.J., & Chard-Wierschem, D. (1993). The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 55-87.
Thornberry, T.P., Lizotte, A.J., Krohn, M.D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S.J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47-83.
Vaughn, M.G., Salas-Wright, C.P., DeLisi, M., & Maynard, B.R. (2013). Violence and externalizing behavior among youth in the United States: Is there a severe 5%? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 12, 3-21.
Vidal, S., Prince, D., Connell, C.M., Caron, C.M., Kaufman, J.S., & Tebes, J.K. (2017). Maltreatment, family environment, and social risk factors: Determinants of the child welfare to juvenile justice transition among maltreated children and adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 63, 7-18.
Waller, R., Gardner, F., & Hyde, L.W. (2013). What are the associations between parenting, callous-unemotional traits, and antisocial behavior in youth? A systematic review of evidence. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 593-608.
Weinberger, D.A., & Schwartz, G.E. (1990). Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: A typological perspective. Journal of Personality, 58, 381-417.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
White, S.F., Frick, P.J., Lawing, K., & Bauer, D. (2013). Callous-unemotional traits and response to Functional Family Therapy in adolescent offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 31, 271-285.