Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Combined With Immunotherapy Against Metastatic Melanoma: Long-Term Results of a Phase 1 Clinical Trial.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2020
Historique:
received: 15 01 2020
revised: 31 03 2020
accepted: 15 05 2020
pubmed: 26 5 2020
medline: 7 4 2021
entrez: 26 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) in combination with immunotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. The study also investigates the effects of timing and dosing of SABR on clinical efficacy. Metastatic melanoma patients with at least 2 metastases received SABR to a single metastatic site. All patients had standard dose immunotherapy with anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 at the discretion of their treating clinician. Following a standard 3 + 3 design, patients were escalated through 3 SABR doses (10 Gy, 15 Gy, and 20 Gy) delivered at 3 different time points (with cycle 1, 2, or 3 of immunotherapy). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as grade 3 or higher toxicity within 3 months of first treatment and assessed by an independent data safety monitoring committee (IDSMC). Logistic or Cox regressions were used to assess the impact of SABR dose and timing on the progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of this cohort. Twenty-four patients were enrolled with a median clinical follow-up of 28 months. Four patients (16.7%) developed DLTs; 1 DLT occurred at a SABR-treated site, and all patients received 15 Gy. On this basis the IDSMC recommended stopping the trial and the MTD was defined at 10 Gy. The 2-year PFS was 21.9% (95% CI, 7.1%-41.8%) and 2-year OS was 49.6% (95% CI, 28.7%-67.6%). The median PFS for those receiving 10 Gy was numerically higher than for those receiving 15 Gy, 8.3 months versus 2.1 months (P = .38). The only treatment-related factor associated with both improved PFS (HR 0.08, P < .01) and OS (HR 0.008, P ≤ .01) was receiving SABR with cycle 3. SABR dose (PFS P = .17, OS P = .50) was not significant. SABR at 10 Gy can be safely combined with immunotherapy. SABR timing appears to influence efficacy more than dose and warrants consideration in research attempting to optimize synergism.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32450331
pii: S0360-3016(20)31146-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase I Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

150-156

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Gishan Ratnayake (G)

Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital Raymond Terrace, Brisbane, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: gishan.ratnayake@health.qld.gov.au.

Simone Reinwald (S)

Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Mark Shackleton (M)

Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Maggie Moore (M)

Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Mark Voskoboynik (M)

Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Jeremy Ruben (J)

Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Menno C van Zelm (MC)

Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology Service, Department of Respiratory, Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Research), Central Clinical School, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Di Yu (D)

Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Rachel Ward (R)

Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Robin Smith (R)

Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Andrew Haydon (A)

Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Sashendra Senthi (S)

Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH