Efficacy and adherence of sublingual immunotherapy in patients aged 60 to 75 years old with house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis.
Aged
Animals
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Administration, Sublingual
Age Factors
Combined Modality Therapy
Follow-Up Studies
Medication Adherence
Patient Compliance
Patient Dropouts
Pyroglyphidae
/ pathogenicity
Rhinitis, Allergic
/ drug therapy
Sublingual Immunotherapy
/ adverse effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Adherence
Allergic rhinitis
Efficacy
House dust mite
Patients over 60 years old
Safety
Sublingual immunotherapy
Journal
American journal of otolaryngology
ISSN: 1532-818X
Titre abrégé: Am J Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8000029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
03
04
2020
revised:
23
04
2020
accepted:
03
05
2020
pubmed:
27
5
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
entrez:
27
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adherence of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for house dust mite (HDM)-induced allergic rhinitis (AR) patients over 60 years old. Eighty-six AR patients aged 60-75 years old were randomly divided in the control and treatment group as 1:1 ratio. The control group was treated with standard pharmacotherapy while the treatment group was treated with SLIT plus pharmacotherapy on demand. Patients adherence, combined symptom and medication score (CSMS), visual analog scale (VAS), and presence of adverse events were evaluated in the baseline and after 6-months, 12-months and 24-months treatment. Twenty-five (58.1%) subjects in the treatment group and 20 (46.5%) subjects in the control group completed the study (P > 0.05). The major reasons for premature cessation were out of touch and relieved symptoms. At the same time, CSMS and VAS of the patients over 60 years old in both groups significantly decreased from baseline to any post-baseline time point (all P < 0.05). The comparison of CSMS and VAS between the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in favor of the SLIT group at month 24 (P < 0.05), whereas no differences at month 6 and month 12 (all P > 0.05). 41.9% of the patients dropped out within 2 years of SLIT treatment and the major reasons for premature cessation were out of touch and relieved symptoms. This study suggested that SLIT plus pharmacotherapy provided a greater clinical benefit than pharmacotherapy alone at two years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32451288
pii: S0196-0709(20)30229-5
doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102538
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102538Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest There are no financial or other issues that might lead to conflict of interest.