Development of algorithms to estimate EQ-5D and derive health utilities from WHOQOL-HIV Bref: a mapping study.
Algorithms
Cost–utility analysis
Health economics
Health-related quality of life
Journal
Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-2649
Titre abrégé: Qual Life Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9210257
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
accepted:
13
05
2020
pubmed:
27
5
2020
medline:
30
9
2020
entrez:
27
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to develop and evaluate different families of applicable models available for utility mapping between World Health Organization Quality of Life for HIV-abbreviated version (WHOQOL-HIV Bref) and EQ-5D-3L and to propose an optimised algorithm to estimate health utilities of people living with HIV. Estimation dataset was collected between July 2014 and September 2016 in a cross-sectional study including 1526 people living with HIV/Aids (PLWH) under care at the Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas-FIOCRUZ, in Brazil. Data of WHOQOL-HIV Bref and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires were collected. Fisher's exact tests were used for testing WHOQOL-HIV Bref response frequencies among groups of responses to each of the five EQ-5D-3L domains. Multiple correspondence analyses (MCA) were used to inspect the relationships between both instrument responses. Different families of applicable models available for utility mapping between WHOQOL-HIV Bref and EQ-5D-3L were adjusted for the prediction of disutility. Candidate models' performances using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) were similarly good, which was evidenced by the overlapping of its 95% confidence intervals of the mean tenfold cross-validation or estimated generalisation errors. However, the Hurdle Logistic-Log-Normal model was better on average according to generalisation errors both in the prediction of Brazilian utility values (MAE = 0.1037, MSE = 0.0178, and RMSE = 0.1332) and for those of the UK (MAE = 0.1476, MSE = 0.0443, and RMSE = 0.2099). Mapping EQ-5D-3L responses or deriving health utilities directly from WHOQOL-HIV Bref responses can be a valid alternative for settings with no preference-based health utility data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32451983
doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02534-1
pii: 10.1007/s11136-020-02534-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2497-2508Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U01 AI069476
Pays : United States
Organisme : Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
ID : 476024/2013-7
Organisme : Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
ID : E-26/170.021/2015
Organisme : Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
ID : 476333/2013-0