Placental MRI: Effect of maternal position and uterine contractions on placental BOLD MRI measurements.
BOLD MRI
Braxton-Hicks contraction
Maternal hyperoxia
Maternal position
Placental MRI
Journal
Placenta
ISSN: 1532-3102
Titre abrégé: Placenta
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8006349
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
22
01
2020
revised:
16
04
2020
accepted:
17
04
2020
pubmed:
27
5
2020
medline:
2
6
2021
entrez:
27
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Before using blood-oxygen-level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD MRI) during maternal hyperoxia as a method to detect individual placental dysfunction, it is necessary to understand spatiotemporal variations that represent normal placental function. We investigated the effect of maternal position and Braxton-Hicks contractions on estimates obtained from BOLD MRI of the placenta during maternal hyperoxia. For 24 uncomplicated singleton pregnancies (gestational age 27-36 weeks), two separate BOLD MRI datasets were acquired, one in the supine and one in the left lateral maternal position. The maternal oxygenation was adjusted as 5 min of room air (21% O In mothers without contractions, increases in global placental R Both maternal position and Braxton-Hicks contractions significantly affect global and regional changes in placental R
Identifiants
pubmed: 32452404
pii: S0143-4004(20)30112-0
doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2020.04.008
pmc: PMC7358045
mid: NIHMS1593933
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
69-77Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : P41 EB015902
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB017337
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD100009
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U01 HD087211
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.
Références
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;55(3):293-302
pubmed: 31452271
Neuroimage. 2001 Sep;14(3):595-606
pubmed: 11506533
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1963 May 15;86:213-25
pubmed: 13990708
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;34(6):687-92
pubmed: 19771583
Radiology. 2006 Mar;238(3):872-80
pubmed: 16439569
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;42(3):310-4
pubmed: 23303592
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Mar;46(3):599-602
pubmed: 35496
Eur Radiol. 2013 May;23(5):1335-42
pubmed: 23440313
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jun;29(6):1310-20
pubmed: 20378467
Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):1975-1985
pubmed: 28759487
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan 1;1(1):46-9
pubmed: 12797102
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 16;7(1):3713
pubmed: 28623277
Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Feb;55(2):203-5
pubmed: 7352082
BJOG. 2014 Dec;121(13):1595
pubmed: 24816172
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jan;29(1):196-205
pubmed: 19923044
BJOG. 2006 Nov;113(11):1239-47
pubmed: 16978230
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1992;34(3):155-8
pubmed: 1427416
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Aug;46(2):403-412
pubmed: 28152240
Physiol Rep. 2015 Oct;3(10):
pubmed: 26471757
N Engl J Med. 1958 Dec 18;259(25):1219-21
pubmed: 13622914
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):774-88
pubmed: 8164943
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Oct;28(5):285-297
pubmed: 31592995
Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Feb;53(2):182-6
pubmed: 418972
Ann Clin Res. 1976 Feb;8(1):22-6
pubmed: 937990
Respir Med. 1989 Nov;83(6):467-70
pubmed: 2623214
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4 Suppl):S103-14
pubmed: 26428488
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2019 Oct;11767:39-47
pubmed: 32432232
BMJ. 2005 Mar 26;330(7493):724-6
pubmed: 15790646
Placenta. 2016 Mar;39:16-20
pubmed: 26992669
Obstet Gynecol. 1953 Apr;1(4):371-7
pubmed: 13055188
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2004;58(1):22-5
pubmed: 15028865
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Nov;70(5):1427-33
pubmed: 23280967
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(2):315-30
pubmed: 25407766