Independent Validation of Tumor Budding Activity and Cell Nest Size as Determinants of Patient Outcome in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ mortality
Cell Proliferation
Databases, Factual
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Lymphatic Metastasis
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
/ methods
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ mortality
Young Adult
Journal
The American journal of surgical pathology
ISSN: 1532-0979
Titre abrégé: Am J Surg Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7707904
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
27
5
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
27
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A novel 3-tiered grading system that combines tumor budding activity and cell nest size has been found to be highly prognostic in squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of various sites, including lung, oral cavity, larynx, hypopharynx, and esophagus. A similar grading system has recently been proposed for SCC of the uterine cervix. In this study, we appraise this grading system in an institutional cohort of cervical SCC to assess its prognostic value in an independent dataset. Our study cohort consisted of 94 consecutive, surgically excised, neoadjuvant therapy-naive cases of SCC of the uterine cervix, stage pT1b or higher. Tumor budding activity and cell nest size were scored on each case, the sum of which formed the basis for assigning a grade in the 3-tiered grading system hereafter referred to as the "tumor budding/nest size" (TBNS) system. As individual variables, both high tumor budding and small nest size were each associated with reduced overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival. The full TBNS system was associated with decreased OS, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival independent of patient age, pathologic stage, and regional lymph node status. TBNS grades 1, 2, and 3 subgroups were clearly distinguishable on multivariate analyses (hazard ratio for OS of 2.06 [95% confidence interval: 0.5-8.42] for grade 2 and 4.58 [95% confidence interval: 1.24-16.87] for grade 3 tumors, relative to their grade 1 counterparts [P=0.035]). Higher grade tumors in the TBNS system were significantly correlated with advanced pathologic stage and lymph node metastasis (P=0.044 and 0.04, respectively). Among the other, potentially prognostic factors, higher pathologic stage, and lymph node metastasis were associated with decreased OS (P<0.001 and 0.004, respectively), whereas keratinization, nuclear size, mitotic count, and World Health Organization (WHO) grade were not. In conclusion, the proposed TBNS grading system is an excellent prognostic indicator that may potentially provide information that is useful in clinical decision-making. Our findings validate the previous study that proposed this system for prognostically stratifying cervical SCC patients. If further confirmed, consideration should be given to routinely adding a TBNS grade to pathologic descriptions of cervical SCC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32452873
doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001472
pii: 00000478-202009000-00001
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1151-1160Références
World Health Organization. Cervical cancer. Available at: www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/cervical-cancer/en/. Accessed January 31, 2020.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of cancer incidence and mortality for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
Vinh-Hung V, Bourgain C, Vlastos G, et al. Prognostic value of histopathology and trends in cervical cancer: a SEER population study. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:164.
Horner MJ, Altekruse SF, Zou Z, et al. U.S. geographic distribution of prevaccine era cervical cancer screening, incidence, stage, and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:591–599.
Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, et al. Cervical cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17:64–84.
Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ, et al. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy:a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73:177–183.
Sagi-Dain L, Abol-Fol S, Lavie O, et al. Cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors: is there a role for adjuvant radiotherapy? A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84:606–615.
Li M, Hu M, Wang Y, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;238:1–6.
Schottlaender J, Kermauner F. Zur Kenntnis des Uterus-Karzinoms. Berlin, Germany: S. Karger; 1912.
Stendahl U, Willén H, Willén R. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Definition of parameters in a histopathologic malignancy grading system. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1980;19:467–480.
Linell F, Mansson B. The prognostic value of histologic grading of carcinoma of the cervix uteri; a study of 388 cases treated with radium and roentgen therapy. Acta Radiol. 1952;38:219–238.
Zaino RJ, Ward S, Delgado G, et al. Histopathologic predictors of the behavior of surgically treated stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1992;69:1750–1758.
Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Female Reproductive Organs. Lyon, France: IARC; 2014.
Imai T. Histological comparison of cancer of the stomach in autopsy and operation cases. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1949;40:199–201.
Lugli A, Kirsch R, Ajioka Y, et al. Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:1299–1311.
Grigore AD, Jolly MK, Jia D, et al. Tumor budding: the name is EMT. Partial EMT. J Clin Med. 2016;5:E51.
Dawson H, Lugli A. Molecular and pathogenetic aspects of tumor budding in colorectal cancer. Front Med (Lausanne). 2015;2:11.
Cho SJ, Kakar S. Tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma: translating a morphologic score into clinically meaningful results. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142:952–957.
Zhu Y, Liu H, Xie N, et al. Impact of tumor budding in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2019;41:542–550.
Mäkitie AA, Almangush A, Rodrigo JP, et al. Hallmarks of cancer: tumor budding as a sign of invasion and metastasis in head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2019;41:3712–3718.
Stendahl U, Willén H, Willén R. Classification and grading of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Biol. 1979;18:481–496.
Voutsadakis IA. Prognostic role of tumor budding in breast cancer. World J Exp Med. 2018;8:12–17.
Neppl C, Zlobec I, Schmid RA, et al. Validation of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016 recommendation in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung-a single-center analysis of 354 cases. Mod Pathol. 2019. [Epub ahead of print].
Berg KB, Schaeffer DF. Tumor budding as a standardized parameter in gastrointestinal carcinomas: more than just the colon. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:862–872.
Horn LC, Fischer U, Raptis G, et al. Pattern of invasion is of prognostic value in surgically treated cervical cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:906–911.
Baltzer J, Lohe KJ, Köpcke W, et al. Histological criteria for the prognosis in patients with operated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1982;13:184–194.
Stendahl U, Eklund G, Willén R. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. IV. Analysis of a histopathologic malignancy grading system and construction of a partial index. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1981;20:289–294.
Shinohara S, Ochi T, Miyazaki T, et al. Histopathological prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2004;9:503–509.
Kristensen GB, Abeler VM, Risberg B, et al. Tumor size, depth of invasion, and grading of the invasive tumor front are the main prognostic factors in early squamous cell cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;74:245–251.
Willén H, Eklund G. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. IX. Construction of a partial index in a histopathologic malignancy grading system. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1985;24:133–138.
Huang B, Cai J, Xu X, et al. High-grade tumor budding stratifies early-stage cervical cancer with recurrence risk. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0166311.
Bichel P, Jakobsen A. Histopathologic grading and prognosis of uterine cervical carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 1985;8:247–254.
Crissman JD, Budhraja M, Aron BS, et al. Histopathologic prognostic factors in stage II and III squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. An evaluation of 91 patients treated primarily with radiation therapy. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1987;6:97–103.
Crissman JD, Makuch R, Budhraja M. Histopathologic grading of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. An evaluation of 70 stage Ib patients. Cancer. 1985;55:1590–1596.
Gauthier P, Gore I, Shingleton HM, et al. Identification of histopathologic risk groups in stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66:569–574.
Stock RJ, Zaino R, Bundy BN, et al. Evaluation and comparison of histopathologic grading systems of epithelial carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Gynecologic oncology group studies. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1994;13:99–108.
Masuda R, Kijima H, Imamura N, et al. Tumor budding is a significant indicator of a poor prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma patients. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6:937–943.
Kadota K, Nitadori J, Woo KM, et al. Comprehensive pathological analyses in lung squamous cell carcinoma: single cell invasion, nuclear diameter, and tumor budding are independent prognostic factors for worse outcomes. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:1126–1139.
Weichert W, Kossakowski C, Harms A, et al. Proposal of a prognostically relevant grading scheme for pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Respir J. 2016;47:938–946.
Jesinghaus M, Boxberg M, Konukiewitz B, et al. A novel grading system based on tumor budding and cell nest size is a strong predictor of patient outcome in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:1112–1120.
Boxberg M, Jesinghaus M, Dorfner C, et al. Tumour budding activity and cell nest size determine patient outcome in oral squamous cell carcinoma: proposal for an adjusted grading system. Histopathology. 2017;70:1125–1137.
Boxberg M, Kuhn PH, Reiser M, et al. Tumor budding and cell nest size are highly prognostic in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: further evidence for a unified histopathologic grading system for squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43:303–313.
Jesinghaus M, Strehl J, Boxberg M, et al. Introducing a novel highly prognostic grading scheme based on tumour budding and cell nest size for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. J Pathol Clin Res. 2018;4:93–102.
Satabongkoch N, Khunamornpong S, Pongsuvareeyakul T, et al. Prognostic value of tumor budding in early-stage cervical adenocarcinomas. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18:1717–1722.
Zlobec I, Lugli A. Epithelial mesenchymal transition and tumor budding in aggressive colorectal cancer: tumor budding as oncotarget. Oncotarget. 2010;1:651–661.
Stacy AJ, Craig MP, Sakaram S, et al. ΔNp63α and microRNAs: leveraging the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget. 2017;8:2114–2129.
Horn L, Hommel N, Hentschel B, et al. p63 and 1st role in tumor cell dissociation and juxtatumoral stromal remodeling in carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:695.
Lee MY, Shen MR. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cervical carcinoma. Am J Transl Res. 2012;4:1–13.
Koay MH, Crook M, Stewart CJ. Cyclin D1, E-cadherin and beta-catenin expression in FIGO Stage IA cervical squamous carcinoma: diagnostic value and evidence for epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Histopathology. 2012;61:1125–1133.
Myong NH. Loss of E-cadherin and acquisition of vimentin in epithelial-mesenchymal transition are noble indicators of uterine cervix cancer progression. Korean J Pathol. 2012;46:341–348.
Gilles C, Polette M, Piette J, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in HPV-33-transfected cervical keratinocytes is associated with increased invasiveness and expression of gelatinase A. Int J Cancer. 1994;59:661–666.
Jiang J, Li X, Yin X, et al. Association of low expression of E-cadherin and β-catenin with the progression of early stage human squamous cervical cancer. Oncol Lett. 2019;17:5729–5739.
Fadare O, Reddy H, Wang J, et al. E-cadherin and beta-catenin expression in early stage cervical carcinoma: a tissue microarray study of 147 cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2005;3:38.