The Quality Assessment of Different Geolocalisation Methods for a Sensor System to Monitor Structural Health of Monumental Objects.

Structure-from-Motion cultural heritage electromagnetic sensor geolocalisation multisensor platform non-destructive techniques photogrammetry structural health monitoring (SHM), surveying

Journal

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 May 2020
Historique:
received: 02 04 2020
revised: 11 05 2020
accepted: 18 05 2020
entrez: 28 5 2020
pubmed: 28 5 2020
medline: 28 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cultural heritage objects are affected by a wide range of factors causing their deterioration and decay over time such as ground deformations, changes in hydrographic conditions, vibrations or excess of moisture, which can cause scratches and cracks formation in the case of historic buildings. The electromagnetic spectroscopy has been widely used for non-destructive structural health monitoring of concrete structures. However, the limitation of this technology is a lack of geolocalisation in the space for multispectral architectural documentation. The aim of this study is to examine different geolocalisation methods in order to determine the position of the sensor system, which will then allow to georeference the results of measurements performed by this device and apply corrections to the sensor response, which is a crucial element required for further data processing related to the object structure and its features. The classical surveying, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), and Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry methods were used in this investigation at three test sites. The methods were reviewed and investigated. The results indicated that TLS technique should be applied for simple structures and plain textures, while the SfM technique should be used for marble-based and other translucent or semi-translucent structures in order to achieve the highest accuracy for geolocalisation of the proposed sensor system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32455650
pii: s20102915
doi: 10.3390/s20102915
pmc: PMC7284561
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 28;19(3):
pubmed: 30696110
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 12;19(9):
pubmed: 31083623
Opt Express. 2018 May 28;26(11):14444-14460
pubmed: 29877482
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Aug 05;17(8):
pubmed: 28783073
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 12;13(2):
pubmed: 31940931
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Nov 26;19(23):
pubmed: 31779178
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Oct 17;19(20):
pubmed: 31627331

Auteurs

Jakub Markiewicz (J)

Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Pl. Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland.

Sławomir Łapiński (S)

Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Pl. Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland.

Patryk Kot (P)

Built Environment and Sustainable Technologies (BEST) Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.

Aleksandra Tobiasz (A)

Documentation and Digitalization Department, Museum of King Jan III's Palace at Wilanów, ul. Stanisława Kostki Potockiego 10/16, 02-958 Warsaw, Poland.

Magomed Muradov (M)

Built Environment and Sustainable Technologies (BEST) Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.

Joanna Nikel (J)

Department of Material Culture History, University of Wrocław, Szewska 49, 50-137 Wroclaw, Poland.

Andy Shaw (A)

Built Environment and Sustainable Technologies (BEST) Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.

Ahmed Al-Shamma'a (A)

Collage of Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, UAE.

Classifications MeSH