Effects of Storage Conditions on Degradation of Chlorophyll and Emulsifying Capacity of Thylakoid Powders Produced by Different Drying Methods.
chlorophyll degradation
drying
emulsifying capacity
functional foods
processing
thylakoids
Journal
Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 May 2020
22 May 2020
Historique:
received:
23
04
2020
revised:
15
05
2020
accepted:
19
05
2020
entrez:
28
5
2020
pubmed:
28
5
2020
medline:
28
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Thylakoid membranes isolated from spinach have previously been shown to inhibit lipase/co-lipase and prolong satiety in vivo. There is a need to develop thylakoid products that not only have the desired characteristics and functionality after processing, but also are stable and provide equivalent effect on appetite over the promised shelf life. The aim of the present study was therefore to evaluate how the thylakoid powders' characteristics and functionality were affected by moisture during storage. Thylakoids produced by drum-drying, spray-drying, and freeze-drying were incubated in controlled atmosphere with different relative humidity (10 RH%, 32 RH%, 48 RH% and 61 RH%) for 8 months. The water content in all powders was increased during storage. The water absorption was moisture-dependent, and the powders were considered hygroscopic. Relative humidity showed a definite influence on the rate of chlorophyll degradation and loss of green color in thylakoid powders after storage which correlated with impaired emulsifying capacity. Spray-dried powder had the overall highest chlorophyll content and emulsifying capacity at all RH-levels investigated. Spray drying was therefore considered the most suitable drying method yielding a powder with best-maintained functionality after storage. The results can be applied towards quality control of high-quality functional foods with appetite suppressing abilities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32455958
pii: foods9050669
doi: 10.3390/foods9050669
pmc: PMC7278877
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : VINNOVA
ID : 2010-01860
Références
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Dec;5(12):971-82
pubmed: 15573135
Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999 Oct 15;56(3-4):330-47
pubmed: 11212360
Biochem J. 1961 Feb;78:359-64
pubmed: 13715233
Food Funct. 2014 Sep;5(9):2157-65
pubmed: 25016966
Photosynth Res. 1993 Feb;35(2):171-8
pubmed: 24318683
Biochem J. 2007 Feb 1;401(3):727-33
pubmed: 17044813
Appetite. 2013 Sep;68:118-23
pubmed: 23632035
J Sci Food Agric. 2011 Jan 30;91(2):315-21
pubmed: 20960431
J Agric Food Chem. 1999 Jun;47(6):2404-9
pubmed: 10794643
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Dec;26 Suppl 2:241-50
pubmed: 18081667
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(6):712-9
pubmed: 19308799
Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;40(1):13-27
pubmed: 20024791
Food Chem Toxicol. 1986 Oct-Nov;24(10-11):1021-30
pubmed: 3542756
Appetite. 2014 Oct;81:295-304
pubmed: 24993695
J Nutr Sci. 2013 Jul 24;2:e20
pubmed: 25191569
Food Funct. 2015 Apr;6(4):1310-8
pubmed: 25765716
J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Mar;98(4):1554-1565
pubmed: 28816350
J Sci Food Agric. 2013 Jul;93(9):2254-8
pubmed: 23355304
Phytother Res. 2009 Dec;23(12):1778-83
pubmed: 19548286