Isolated aberrant right cysticohepatic duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Evaluation and treatment challenges of a severe postoperative complication associated with an extremely rare anatomical variant.
Bile duct injury
Hepaticojejunostomy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Right sectoral bile duct
Rule rather than the exception
Variability in bile duct branching pattern
Journal
Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery
ISSN: 2508-5859
Titre abrégé: Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101698342
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 May 2020
31 May 2020
Historique:
received:
13
09
2019
revised:
15
01
2020
accepted:
20
01
2020
entrez:
28
5
2020
pubmed:
28
5
2020
medline:
28
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A typical bile duct branching patterns represent one of the major causes of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The most common classified variations of bile duct branching, involve the right posterior sectoral duct (RPSD) and its joining with the right anterior or left hepatic duct. Variant bile duct anatomy can rarely be extremely complex and unclassified. This report describes an extremely rare case of an isolated injury to an aberrant right hepatic duct formed by the joining of ducts from segments V, VII, and VIII draining into the cystic duct (cysticohepatic duct) during LC, associated with an inferior RPSD opening to left hepatic duct. Detailed evaluation of both endoscopic and magnetic cholangiograms established the diagnosis. Bile duct injury was subsequently managed surgically by a demanding Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. This extremely rare case aims to serve as a useful reminder of the consistent inconsistency of biliary anatomy, alerting surgeons to beware of variant bile duct branching patterns during open or LC that constitute a dreadful pitfall for severe and life-threatening bile duct injuries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32457271
pii: ahbps.2020.24.2.221
doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.2.221
pmc: PMC7271109
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
221-227Références
World J Surg. 2001 Oct;25(10):1241-4
pubmed: 11596882
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jul;211(1):132-8
pubmed: 20610259
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Feb;14(2):344-51
pubmed: 19911237
Surg Radiol Anat. 2008 Oct;30(7):539-45
pubmed: 18491027
J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 Mar-Apr;4(2):168-77
pubmed: 10675240
Pol J Radiol. 2016 May 26;81:250-5
pubmed: 27298653
Surg Clin North Am. 1994 Aug;74(4):781-803; discussion 805-7
pubmed: 8047942
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Jan;42(1):28-45
pubmed: 27503381
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Feb;61(2):269-75
pubmed: 15729238
Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Sep;44(3):350-4
pubmed: 8885363
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):724-730
pubmed: 30006843
Anat Res Int. 2012;2012:838179
pubmed: 23056946
Br J Surg. 1996 Feb;83(2):171-5
pubmed: 8689155
Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):191-4
pubmed: 9501813
NMR Biomed. 2003 Dec;16(8):475-8
pubmed: 14696004
Am J Surg. 1996 Jan;171(1):187-91
pubmed: 8554138
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):101-25
pubmed: 8000648
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005 Mar-Apr;28(2):185-95
pubmed: 15770390
Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2684-91
pubmed: 21416174
Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):82-6
pubmed: 14685104
Radiographics. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):3-22; questionnaire 288-94
pubmed: 11158640
Surg Radiol Anat. 1991;13(3):203-11
pubmed: 1754955
Korean J Radiol. 2003 Apr-Jun;4(2):85-90
pubmed: 12845303
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:2403012
pubmed: 28348578