Spatial-dependent regularization to solve the inverse problem in electromyometrial imaging.
Electromyometrial imaging
Inverse problem
Regularization
Journal
Medical & biological engineering & computing
ISSN: 1741-0444
Titre abrégé: Med Biol Eng Comput
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
22
05
2019
accepted:
30
04
2020
pubmed:
28
5
2020
medline:
20
5
2021
entrez:
28
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently, electromyometrial imaging (EMMI) was developed to non-invasively image uterine contractions in three dimensions. EMMI collects body surface electromyography (EMG) measurements and uses patient-specific body-uterus geometry generated from magnetic resonance images to reconstruct uterine electrical activity. Currently, EMMI uses the zero-order Tikhonov method with mean composite residual and smoothing operator (CRESO) to stabilize the underlying ill-posed inverse computation. However, this method is empirical and implements a global regularization parameter over all uterine sites, which is sub-optimal for EMMI given the severe eccentricity of body-uterus geometry. To address this limitation, we developed a spatial-dependent (SP) regularization method that considers both body-uterus eccentricity and EMG noise. We used electrical signals simulated with spherical and realistic geometry models to compare the reconstruction accuracy of the SP method to those of the CRESO and the L-Curve methods. The SP method reconstructed electrograms and potential maps more accurately than the other methods, especially in cases of high eccentricity and noise contamination. Thus, the SP method should facilitate clinical use of EMMI and can be used to improve the accuracy of other electrical imaging modalities, such as Electrocardiographic Imaging. Graphical abstract The spatial-dependent regularization (SP) technique was designed to improve the accuracy of Electromyometrial Imaging (EMMI). The top panel shows the eccentricity of body-uterus geometry and four representative body surface electrograms. The bottom panel shows boxplots of correlation coefficients and relative errors for the electrograms reconstructed with SP and two conventional methods, the L-Curve and mean CRESO methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32458384
doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02183-z
pii: 10.1007/s11517-020-02183-z
pmc: PMC7347447
mid: NIHMS1597789
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1651-1665Subventions
Organisme : BrightFocus Foundation
ID : A2017330S
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD094381
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH/National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
ID : RO1HD094381
Organisme : NIH/National Institute of Aging
ID : RO1AG053548
Organisme : March of Dimes
ID : March of Dimes Prematurity Research Center
Références
Physiol Meas. 2009 Aug;30(8):745-61
pubmed: 19550024
Circ Res. 1991 Jun;68(6):1501-26
pubmed: 1709839
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):66.e1-6
pubmed: 23122926
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Dec 7;52(23):7023-44
pubmed: 18029991
Circulation. 2000 Feb 8;101(5):533-40
pubmed: 10662751
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;3(3):232-242
pubmed: 29759517
Front Physiol. 2018 Sep 20;9:1305
pubmed: 30294281
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007 Jun;18(3):289-95
pubmed: 17659954
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 28;11(3):e0152421
pubmed: 27019202
Am J Physiol. 1993 Jan;264(1 Pt 1):C1-18
pubmed: 8430759
Ann Biomed Eng. 2003 Sep;31(8):981-94
pubmed: 12918913
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;204(3):228.e1-10
pubmed: 21145033
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1998 Jan-Feb;17(1):73-83
pubmed: 9460623
Ann Biomed Eng. 2006 Aug;34(8):1272-88
pubmed: 16807788
Sci Transl Med. 2019 Mar 13;11(483):
pubmed: 30867320
Science. 2014 Aug 15;345(6198):760-5
pubmed: 25124429
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1977 Jan;24(1):1-11
pubmed: 832882
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;209(1):38.e1-6
pubmed: 23562354
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997 Feb;44(2):188-99
pubmed: 9214798
Physiol Meas. 2014 Aug;35(8):1537-50
pubmed: 25071094
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jan;116:103543
pubmed: 31786490
Circulation. 1997 Aug 5;96(3):1012-24
pubmed: 9264513
Physiol Meas. 2018 Feb 26;39(2):02TR01
pubmed: 29406317
Comput Biol Med. 2016 Oct 1;77:182-94
pubmed: 27567400
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec;169(6):1636-53
pubmed: 8267082
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2015 Feb;213(2):406-16
pubmed: 25393600
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1998 Sep-Oct;17(5):84-101, 122
pubmed: 9770610