Turkish version of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale: A psychometric study.
pregnancy-related anxiety
reliability
scale
validity
Journal
Perspectives in psychiatric care
ISSN: 1744-6163
Titre abrégé: Perspect Psychiatr Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401133
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
15
01
2020
revised:
05
05
2020
accepted:
10
05
2020
pubmed:
28
5
2020
medline:
18
2
2021
entrez:
28
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To adapt the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale (PrAS) into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties. This cross-sectional study comprised of 400 pregnant women. The PrAS was translated using the methods of translation, back-translation, consensus meetings, and a trial of potential users. Then, its psychometric properties were evaluated by exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The PrAS consists of 33 items. Following the exploratory factor analysis, the two items in the scale were discarded because factor loads were less than 0.50, therefore, the number of items decreased from 33 to 31. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness-of-fit indices of the scale were found to be suitable. The internal consistency coefficient calculated for the reliability of the scale was .89. After correlating it with another scale for measuring pregnancy distress, the Turkish version of the PrAS shows discriminant validity. The Turkish version of the PrAS is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to evaluate pregnancy-related-anxiety. The use of the PrAS in prenatal healthcare services will contribute to the early diagnosis, treatment, and management of pregnancy-related anxiety.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
157-166Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Arslan B, Arslan A, Kara S, Öngel K, Mungan MT. Risk factors for pregnancy, anxiety, and depression: assessment in 452 cases. J Tepecik Educ Res Hosp. 2011;21(2):79-84.
Tunç AY, Yapıcı G. Evaluation of students' depression, anxiety and stress levels in a medical faculty. Turk J Public Health. 2019;17(2):153-168.
Deklava L, Lubina K, Circenis K, Sudraba V, Millere I. Causes of anxiety during pregnancy. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2015;205:623-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.097
Hoffman R, Benz EJ Jr, Silberstein LE, Heslop H, Weitz Jn, Anastasi J. Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018. https://0211p7xvv-y-https-www-clinicalkey-com.proxy.sakarya.deep-knowledge.net/#!/browse/book/3-s2.0-C20130233559?indexOverride=GLOBAL
Sundström Poromaa I, Comasco E, Georgakis MK, Skalkidou A. Sex differences in depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(1-2):719-730. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23859
Yılmaz M, Ocakçı AF. Determination the anxiety level of university students one dormitory located. J Maltepe Univ Sci Art. 2010;3(1):15-23.
Zaman FK, Özkan N, Toprak D. Depression and anxiety in pregnancy. Konuralp Med J. 2018;10(1):20-25.
Akka SÇ (2014). Dyadic adjustment in pregnancy period (Unpublished Master thesis). Adnan Menderes University, Health Sciences Institute, Aydın, Turkey.
Oliva-Pérez J, Cabrero-García J, Cabañero-Martínez MJ, Richart-Martínez M, Oliver-Roig A. Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Pregnancy-Related Thoughts Scale. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019;48(5):526-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2019.07.006
Sinesi A, Maxwell M, O'Carroll R, Cheyne H. Anxiety scales used in pregnancy: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry Open. 2019;5(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.751
Brunton RJ, Dryer R, Saliba A, Kohlhoff J. Pregnancy anxiety: a systematic review of current scales. J Affect Disord. 2015;176:24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.039
Nath A, Venkatesh S, Balan S, Metgud CS, Krishna M, Murthy GVS. The prevalence and determinants of pregnancy-related anxiety amongst pregnant women at less than 24 weeks of pregnancy in Bangalore, Southern India. Int J Women's Health. 2019;11:241-248. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S193306
Wall V, Premji SS, Letourneau N, McCaffrey G, Nyanza EC. Factors associated with pregnancy-related anxiety in Tanzanian women: A cross sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e020056.
Derya YA, Taşhan ST, Duman M, Ozan YD. Turkish adaptation of the pregnancy-related anxiety questionnaire-revised 2: validity and reliability study in multiparous and primiparous pregnancy. Midwifery. 2018;62:61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.006
Guardino CM, Schetter CD. Understanding pregnancy anxiety: concepts, correlates, and consequences. Zero to Three. 2014;34(4):12-21.
Gündoğdu G. (2013). Evaluation of between anxiety and labor pain of pregnant women who were in 3. trimester (Unpublished Master thesis). Atatürk Univ, Health Sciences Institute, Erzurum, Turkey.
Özşahin Z, Erdemoğlu Ç, Karakayalı Ç. Psychosocial health level and related factors in pregnancy. J Turkish Family Phys. 2018;9(2):34-46. https://doi.org/10.15511/tjtfp.18.00234
Uçar T, Gölbaşı Z. Fear of labor. J Health Sci İnönü Univ. 2015;4(2):54-58.
Brunton RJ, Dryer R, Saliba A, Kohlhoff J. The initial development of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale. Women Birth. 2019;32(1):e118-e130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.004
Rosario MK, Premji SS, Nyanza EC, Bouchal SR, Este D. A qualitative study of pregnancy-related anxiety among women in Tanzania. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016072. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016072
Arch JJ. Pregnancy-specific anxiety: which women are highest and what are the alcohol-related risks? Compr Psychiatry. 2013;54(3):217-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.07.010
Vázquez MB, Pereira B, Míguez MC. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Pregnancy Related Anxiety Questionnaire (PRAQ). Span J Psychol. 2018;21(e64):1-10.
Mahrer NE, Ramos IF, Guardino C, et al. Pregnancy anxiety in expectant mothers predicts offspring negative affect: the moderating role of acculturation. Early Hum Dev. 2020;141:104932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.104932
Acosta H, Tuulari JJ, Scheinin NM, et al. Maternal pregnancy-related anxiety is associated with sexually dimorphic alterations in amygdala volume in four-year-old children. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;13:175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00175
Madhavanprabhakaran GK, Kumar KA, Ramasubramaniam S, Akintola AA. Effects of pregnancy related anxiety on labour outcomes: a prospective cohort study. J Res Nurs Midwifery. 2013;2(7):96-103. https://doi.org/10.14303/JRNM.2013.061
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance. 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg192/chapter/1-Recommendations#recognising-mental-health-problems-in-pregnancy-and-the-postnatal-period-and-referral-2. Accessed March 27, 2020.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of perinatal mood disorders. 2012. https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign127_update.pdf. Accessed March 27, 2020.
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: the NICE guideline on clinical management and service guidance. 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg192/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-4840896925. Accessed March 27, 2020.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 757. Screening for perinatal depression. Obst Gynecol. 2018;132(5):e208-e212. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002927
Bayrampour H, McDonald S, Fung T, Tough S. Reliability and validity of three shortened versions of the State Anxiety Inventory scale during the perinatal period. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2014;35:101-107. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2014.950218
Çapık A, Pasinlioğlu T. Validity and reliability study of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale into Turkish. J Psychiatry Ment Health Nurs. 2015;22(4):260-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12211
Alizadeh S, Ebadi A, Kariman N, Ozgoli G. Dyadic sexual communication scale: psychometrics properties and translation of the Persian version. Sexual Relationsh Ther. 2019;35(1):1-12.
Onrat T. (2018). Determination of prevalence of anxiety and depression in pregnant women and their effects on quality of life (Unpublished Master thesis). Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Health Sciences Institute, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Brunton RJ, Dryer R, Krägeloh C, Saliba A, Kohlhoff J, Medvedev O. The pregnancy-related anxiety scale: A validity examination using Rasch analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018;236:127-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.116
Pop VJ, Pommer AM, Pop-Purceleanu M, Wijnen HA, Bergink V, Pouwer F. Development of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale: the TPDS. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-80
Gönültaş MB, Öztürk M, Rios EYZ, Kanak M, Demir E. Perceptions toward Criminals Scale: the reliability and validity analyses. J Anatolian Psychiatry. 2019;20:41-47. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.40824
Çevik H, Şimşek KY. Applicability of resource theory on leisure sport events: validity and reliability study. J Human Sci. 2018;15(2):970-983. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v15i2.5294
Souza ACD, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EDB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2017;26:649-659. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-1432.
Halek M, Holle D, Bartholomeyczik S. Development and evaluation of the content validity, practicability and feasibility of the ınnovative dementia-oriented assessment system for challenging behaviour in residents with dementia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):554. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2469-8
Soeken WKL. Validity of measures. In: Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER, eds. Measurement in nursing and health research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2010: 163-202.
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(4):424-453.
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model. 1999;6:1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kumcagız H. Pregnant women, body image and self-esteem according to the examination of some of the variables. J Human Sci. 2012;9(2):691-703.
Price PC, Jhangiani RS, Chiang ICA. Research Methods in Psychology. 2nd Canadian Ed. Victoria, BC: BC Campus.
Tunçel NT, Süt HK. The effect of anxiety, depression and prenatal distress levels in pregnancy on prenatal attachment. J Gynec-Obstet Neonatol. 2019;16(1):9-17.