Views among Malawian women about joining HIV prevention clinical trials when pregnant.
Clinical trials
HIV prevention
Pregnancy
Qualitative methods
Research ethics
Women’s views
Journal
AIDS research and therapy
ISSN: 1742-6405
Titre abrégé: AIDS Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101237921
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2020
27 05 2020
Historique:
received:
26
11
2019
accepted:
04
05
2020
entrez:
29
5
2020
pubmed:
29
5
2020
medline:
2
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The pressing need to expand the biomedical HIV prevention evidence base during pregnancy is now increasingly recognized. Women's views regarding participation in such trials and initiating PrEP while pregnant are critical to inform evolving policy and best practices aimed at responsibly expanding evidence-based access for this population. We conducted 35 semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women in Malawi in the local language, Chichewa. Participants were HIV-negative and purposively sampled to capture a range of experience with research during pregnancy. Women's perspectives on enrolling in three hypothetical HIV prevention trial vignettes while pregnant were explored, testing: (1) oral PrEP (Truvada) (2) a vaginal ring (dapivirine), and (3) a randomized trial comparing the two. The vignettes were read aloud to participants and a simple visual was provided. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated, and coded using NVivo 11. Thematic analysis informed the analytic approach. A majority of women accepted participation in all trials. Women's views on research participation varied largely based on their assessment of whether participation or nonparticipation would best protect their own health and that of their offspring. Women interested in participating described power dynamics with their partner as fueling their HIV exposure concerns and highlighted health benefits of participation-principally, HIV protection and access to testing/treatment and ancillary care, and perceived potential risks of the vignettes as low. Women who were uninterested in participating highlighted potential maternal and fetal health risks of the trial, challenges of justifying prevention use to their partner, and raised some modality-specific concerns. Women also described ways their social networks, sense of altruism and adherence requirements would influence participation decisions. The majority of participants conveyed strong interest in participating in biomedical HIV prevention research during pregnancy, largely motivated by a desire to protect themselves and their offspring. Our results are consistent with other studies that found high acceptance of HIV prevention products during pregnancy, and support the current direction of HIV research policies and practices that are increasingly aimed at protecting the health of pregnant women and their offspring through responsible research, rather than defaulting to their exclusion.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The pressing need to expand the biomedical HIV prevention evidence base during pregnancy is now increasingly recognized. Women's views regarding participation in such trials and initiating PrEP while pregnant are critical to inform evolving policy and best practices aimed at responsibly expanding evidence-based access for this population.
METHODS
We conducted 35 semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women in Malawi in the local language, Chichewa. Participants were HIV-negative and purposively sampled to capture a range of experience with research during pregnancy. Women's perspectives on enrolling in three hypothetical HIV prevention trial vignettes while pregnant were explored, testing: (1) oral PrEP (Truvada) (2) a vaginal ring (dapivirine), and (3) a randomized trial comparing the two. The vignettes were read aloud to participants and a simple visual was provided. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated, and coded using NVivo 11. Thematic analysis informed the analytic approach.
RESULTS
A majority of women accepted participation in all trials. Women's views on research participation varied largely based on their assessment of whether participation or nonparticipation would best protect their own health and that of their offspring. Women interested in participating described power dynamics with their partner as fueling their HIV exposure concerns and highlighted health benefits of participation-principally, HIV protection and access to testing/treatment and ancillary care, and perceived potential risks of the vignettes as low. Women who were uninterested in participating highlighted potential maternal and fetal health risks of the trial, challenges of justifying prevention use to their partner, and raised some modality-specific concerns. Women also described ways their social networks, sense of altruism and adherence requirements would influence participation decisions.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of participants conveyed strong interest in participating in biomedical HIV prevention research during pregnancy, largely motivated by a desire to protect themselves and their offspring. Our results are consistent with other studies that found high acceptance of HIV prevention products during pregnancy, and support the current direction of HIV research policies and practices that are increasingly aimed at protecting the health of pregnant women and their offspring through responsible research, rather than defaulting to their exclusion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32460804
doi: 10.1186/s12981-020-00271-6
pii: 10.1186/s12981-020-00271-6
pmc: PMC7251879
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI108368
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI127024
Pays : United States
Références
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 2;367(5):411-22
pubmed: 22784040
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):901-7
pubmed: 16157085
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 15;59 Suppl 7:S400-7
pubmed: 25425718
J Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 5;218(1):16-25
pubmed: 29514254
PLoS Med. 2008 May 20;5(5):e90
pubmed: 18494553
Lancet. 2005 Jul 23-29;366(9482):336-40
pubmed: 16039339
Malawi Med J. 2008 Jun;20(2):37-41
pubmed: 19537430
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):349-362
pubmed: 29998787
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Mar 8;20(Suppl 1):21295
pubmed: 28361503
Am J Public Health. 1998 Apr;88(4):564-6
pubmed: 9550994
Women Birth. 2018 Oct;31(5):350-361
pubmed: 29373261
PLoS One. 2018 May 14;13(5):e0197143
pubmed: 29758064
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Mar 04;13:57
pubmed: 23510451
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Nov 1;76(3):259-265
pubmed: 28777265
Am J Perinatol. 2003 Feb;20(2):69-76
pubmed: 12660911
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 5;372(6):509-18
pubmed: 25651245
N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 18;337(12):853-6
pubmed: 9295246
Sex Health. 2018 Nov;15(6):501-512
pubmed: 30447703
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Feb;10(1):59-64
pubmed: 25742667
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Dec;32(12):538-544
pubmed: 30036072
Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1182-8
pubmed: 16198767
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Aug;26(4):473-86
pubmed: 22386542
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 8;9(1):4156
pubmed: 30297889
AIDS. 2009 Jun 19;23(10):1255-9
pubmed: 19455017
PLoS Med. 2014 Feb 25;11(2):e1001608
pubmed: 24586123
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Dec 15;79(5):566-572
pubmed: 30383589
Afr J Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;18(3 Spec No):135-42
pubmed: 26050386
AIDS. 2016 Sep 24;30(15):2261-5
pubmed: 27490637
Vaccine. 2019 May 3;:
pubmed: 31060949
Reprod Health. 2017 Dec 14;14(Suppl 3):160
pubmed: 29297375
J Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;43(12):824-828
pubmed: 28348164
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 04;15:207
pubmed: 26341516
AIDS. 2011 Sep 24;25(15):1887-95
pubmed: 21785321
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):89-98
pubmed: 28949845
Contraception. 2011 Jan;83(1):74-81
pubmed: 21134507
IRB. 2012 Jul-Aug;34(4):1-8
pubmed: 22893991
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2011 Dec;21(4):311-47
pubmed: 22187929
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 2;367(5):399-410
pubmed: 22784037
Womens Health Issues. 2013 Jan;23(1):e39-45
pubmed: 23312713
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):581
pubmed: 30445925
Science. 2010 Sep 3;329(5996):1168-74
pubmed: 20643915
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015 Jul;10(4):239-45
pubmed: 26049948
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115014
pubmed: 25542035
Lancet HIV. 2018 Dec;5(12):e688-e695
pubmed: 30467022