APOE ε4 genotype-dependent cerebrospinal fluid proteomic signatures in Alzheimer's disease.
APOE genotype
Amyloid aggregation
CSF proteomics
Journal
Alzheimer's research & therapy
ISSN: 1758-9193
Titre abrégé: Alzheimers Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101511643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2020
27 05 2020
Historique:
received:
18
10
2019
accepted:
06
05
2020
entrez:
29
5
2020
pubmed:
29
5
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aggregation of amyloid β into plaques in the brain is one of the earliest pathological events in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The exact pathophysiology leading to dementia is still uncertain, but the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype plays a major role. We aimed to identify the molecular pathways associated with amyloid β aggregation using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics and to study the potential modifying effects of APOE ε4 genotype. We tested 243 proteins and protein fragments in CSF comparing 193 subjects with AD across the cognitive spectrum (65% APOE ε4 carriers, average age 75 ± 7 years) against 60 controls with normal CSF amyloid β, normal cognition, and no APOE ε4 allele (average age 75 ± 6 years). One hundred twenty-nine proteins (53%) were associated with aggregated amyloid β. APOE ε4 carriers with AD showed altered concentrations of proteins involved in the complement pathway and glycolysis when cognition was normal and lower concentrations of proteins involved in synapse structure and function when cognitive impairment was moderately severe. APOE ε4 non-carriers with AD showed lower expression of proteins involved in synapse structure and function when cognition was normal and lower concentrations of proteins that were associated with complement and other inflammatory processes when cognitive impairment was mild. Repeating analyses for 114 proteins that were available in an independent EMIF-AD MBD dataset (n = 275) showed that 80% of the proteins showed group differences in a similar direction, but overall, 28% effects reached statistical significance (ranging between 6 and 87% depending on the disease stage and genotype), suggesting variable reproducibility. These results imply that AD pathophysiology depends on APOE genotype and that treatment for AD may need to be tailored according to APOE genotype and severity of the cognitive impairment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Aggregation of amyloid β into plaques in the brain is one of the earliest pathological events in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The exact pathophysiology leading to dementia is still uncertain, but the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype plays a major role. We aimed to identify the molecular pathways associated with amyloid β aggregation using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics and to study the potential modifying effects of APOE ε4 genotype.
METHODS
We tested 243 proteins and protein fragments in CSF comparing 193 subjects with AD across the cognitive spectrum (65% APOE ε4 carriers, average age 75 ± 7 years) against 60 controls with normal CSF amyloid β, normal cognition, and no APOE ε4 allele (average age 75 ± 6 years).
RESULTS
One hundred twenty-nine proteins (53%) were associated with aggregated amyloid β. APOE ε4 carriers with AD showed altered concentrations of proteins involved in the complement pathway and glycolysis when cognition was normal and lower concentrations of proteins involved in synapse structure and function when cognitive impairment was moderately severe. APOE ε4 non-carriers with AD showed lower expression of proteins involved in synapse structure and function when cognition was normal and lower concentrations of proteins that were associated with complement and other inflammatory processes when cognitive impairment was mild. Repeating analyses for 114 proteins that were available in an independent EMIF-AD MBD dataset (n = 275) showed that 80% of the proteins showed group differences in a similar direction, but overall, 28% effects reached statistical significance (ranging between 6 and 87% depending on the disease stage and genotype), suggesting variable reproducibility.
CONCLUSIONS
These results imply that AD pathophysiology depends on APOE genotype and that treatment for AD may need to be tailored according to APOE genotype and severity of the cognitive impairment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32460813
doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00628-z
pii: 10.1186/s13195-020-00628-z
pmc: PMC7254647
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Apolipoprotein E4
0
Biomarkers
0
tau Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
65Références
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Jan;73(1):60-7
pubmed: 26524180
Bioessays. 2017 Sep;39(9):
pubmed: 28731260
Ann Neurol. 2009 Apr;65(4):403-13
pubmed: 19296504
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Oct;13(10):997-1005
pubmed: 25201514
Glia. 2015 Jan;63(1):51-65
pubmed: 25092803
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Apr 23;53(1):95-106
pubmed: 27128370
JAMA. 2015 May 19;313(19):1939-49
pubmed: 25988463
Neuroepidemiology. 2012;38(1):1-17
pubmed: 22179327
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Jul 20;5(9):1037-1047
pubmed: 30250861
J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 17;33(16):7099-107
pubmed: 23595767
Acta Neuropathol. 2010 Apr;119(4):421-33
pubmed: 20204386
Neurobiol Aging. 2014 Dec;35(12):2746-2760
pubmed: 25002035
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Mol Neurodegener. 2009 Aug 20;4:35
pubmed: 19695092
Neurobiol Aging. 2000 May-Jun;21(3):383-421
pubmed: 10858586
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016 Dec 22;6:50-59
pubmed: 28149943
Cell. 2017 Jun 15;169(7):1276-1290.e17
pubmed: 28602351
Int J Dev Neurosci. 2006 Apr-May;24(2-3):157-65
pubmed: 16384684
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41(3):801-7
pubmed: 24705549
Science. 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):789-91
pubmed: 12399581
Brain Res. 1997 Feb 21;749(1):135-8
pubmed: 9070638
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Jul 17;14(7):14908-22
pubmed: 23867607
Science. 2016 May 6;352(6286):712-716
pubmed: 27033548
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;21(1):108-17
pubmed: 25778476
Dis Markers. 2005;21(2):93-101
pubmed: 15920296
Immunity. 2017 Sep 19;47(3):566-581.e9
pubmed: 28930663
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 2;33(1):64-71
pubmed: 23283322
J Proteome Res. 2010 Oct 1;9(10):5002-24
pubmed: 20695487
Science. 1993 Aug 13;261(5123):921-3
pubmed: 8346443
Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Feb 12;86(2):113-25
pubmed: 20060087
J Mol Neurosci. 2004;23(1-2):105-14
pubmed: 15126696
Mol Immunol. 2011 Aug;48(14):1592-603
pubmed: 21546088
J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22(1):307-13
pubmed: 20847408
Arch Neurol. 2009 Mar;66(3):382-9
pubmed: 19273758
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009 Aug;66(16):2677-89
pubmed: 19434368
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):795-804
pubmed: 22784036
Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jan;29(1):21-9
pubmed: 16337696
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 6;113(36):10186-91
pubmed: 27559087
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2015 Aug;9(7-8):715-31
pubmed: 25676562
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 12;6(1):e16032
pubmed: 21264269
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Jun 23;6(3):36
pubmed: 25478014
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 20;102(51):18694-9
pubmed: 16344479
Biomark Med. 2012 Aug;6(4):455-76
pubmed: 22917147
Brain. 2008 May;131(Pt 5):1252-8
pubmed: 18334538
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Jun 29;4(1):65
pubmed: 27357286
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182098
pubmed: 28771542
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Jul 6;10(1):64
pubmed: 29980228
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D362-D368
pubmed: 27924014
Acta Neuropathol. 1982;57(2-3):239-42
pubmed: 6812382
Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Jun;12(6):654-68
pubmed: 26772638
Neurobiol Aging. 1994 Sep-Oct;15(5):609-14
pubmed: 7824052
JAMA. 2015 May 19;313(19):1924-38
pubmed: 25988462
Ann Neurol. 2011 Jan;69(1):47-64
pubmed: 21280075