Scanning electron microscopic features of explanted degraded hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses which were
Explanted hydrophobic intraocular lenses
IOL microvacuoles
intraocular lens degradation
scanning electron microscopy
surface changes
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
29
5
2020
pubmed:
29
5
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To study and document electron microscopic features in explanted hydrophobic microvacuoles affected acrylic intraocular lenses (IOL) which were in vivo for an average duration of 11 years. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM; Hitachi S 3000 N EXAX Genesis VP SEM) study of five explanted hydrophobic acrylic IOL which had clinically evident microvacuoles prior to explantation, was done. The IOLs were in vivo for a prolonged period and needed explantation for various indications. Only those hydrophobic acrylic IOLs which fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. The findings were compared with control specimens. The IOLs were in vivo for an average duration of 11.6 ± 4.21 years. The cause of explantation of IOL was subluxation in four cases and low visual acuity in one case. Bulk degradation and microvacuoles on cut sections throughout the IOL optics and undulating surface patterns over both the surfaces of the IOL has been documented in all the specimens. No such findings were noted in the control specimens where the surface and texture were homogenous. SEM findings of the structural changes in explanted IOL documented in the study demonstrate that hydrophobic acrylic IOL is degradable in vivo. Microvacuoles are a clinical manifestation of the structural changes that occur at a microscopic and molecular level. These changes are not seen in IOLs which have not undergone intraocular implantation. To our knowledge, a similar study of this kind has not been done.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32461435
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2020_68_6_1086_284833
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2168_19
pmc: PMC7508145
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acrylic Resins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1086-1089Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov-Dec;45(6):564-9
pubmed: 11754896
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Aug;33(8):1405-8
pubmed: 17662432
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1993;3(4):333-50
pubmed: 10146730
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1999;271:45-8
pubmed: 10355159
Bull Math Biol. 2006 Jan;68(1):53-71
pubmed: 16794921
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Oct;27(10):1611-4
pubmed: 11687360
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;35(12):2121-6
pubmed: 19969218
IMA J Math Appl Med Biol. 2002 Mar;19(1):31-60
pubmed: 12408223
Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;91(1):66-70
pubmed: 22035345
Ophthalmology. 1978 Apr;85(4):415-24
pubmed: 662291
Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;132(5):783-5
pubmed: 11704044
Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2012 Sep 20;37(3):62-5
pubmed: 23032245
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 May;27(5):728-33
pubmed: 11377904
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 05;12:1219-1227
pubmed: 30013315
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;144(1):143-4
pubmed: 17601442
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct;29(10):1980-4
pubmed: 14604721
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov 25;15:170
pubmed: 26606985
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Aug;36(8):1398-420
pubmed: 20656166
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;62(6):737-9
pubmed: 25005210
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Oct;43(10):1287-1296
pubmed: 29120714
J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1984 Summer;10(3):309-14
pubmed: 6480482
Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(10):969-81
pubmed: 25621973
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Oct;38(10):1833-44
pubmed: 22999603