Impact of Standardized Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Use on Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization: Results of a Population-Based Retrospective Matched Cohort Analysis.


Journal

JCO oncology practice
ISSN: 2688-1535
Titre abrégé: JCO Oncol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101758685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 29 5 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 29 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is a validated instrument whose use has been standardized in the Ontario cancer system to measure symptoms among ambulatory patients with cancer. The objective was to examine the effect of ESAS exposure on visits to the emergency department (ED) and hospitalizations. This was a retrospective matched cohort study conducted in Ontario, Canada. The study included patients ≥ 18 years of age diagnosed with cancer between 2007 and 2015. Patients were considered exposed if they were screened with ESAS at least once during the study period, and their first ESAS screening date was defined as the index date. Each exposed patient was matched randomly to a patient with cancer without ESAS assessment using a combination of hard matching (birth year ± 2 years, cancer diagnosis date ± 1 year, cancer type, and sex) and propensity score matching (14 variables, including cancer stage, treatments received, and comorbidities). A multivariable Andersen-Gill recurrent event model was used to evaluate the effect of ESAS on the rate of health care use. The analysis included 128,893 matched pairs that were well balanced on baseline measures. After adjusting for other variables, patients with ESAS had lower rates of both ED visits (relative rate [RR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.93) and hospitalizations (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.87) compared with patients without ESAS. ESAS exposure is independently associated with decreased rates of ED visits and hospitalizations. This provides real-world evidence of one potential positive impact of standardized symptom assessment in cancer care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32463762
doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00660
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e958-e965

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Lisa Barbera (L)

Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Rinku Sutradhar (R)

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Hsien Seow (H)

Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Craig C Earle (CC)

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Doris Howell (D)

University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Nicole Mittmann (N)

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Qing Li (Q)

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Deva Thiruchelvam (D)

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH