Efficacy and safety of cold-snare endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal adenomas 10 to 14 mm in size: a prospective observational study.
Journal
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
ISSN: 1097-6779
Titre abrégé: Gastrointest Endosc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0010505
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
26
12
2019
accepted:
04
05
2020
pubmed:
29
5
2020
medline:
20
3
2021
entrez:
29
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cold-snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) has been adapted in a piecemeal fashion as a safe and effective procedure for resection of colorectal polyps ≥10 mm. However, few data are available on en bloc CS-EMR for adenomas of 10 to 14 mm. Thus, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CS-EMR for these colorectal adenomas. In this single-arm, prospective, observational study, patients with at least 1 slightly elevated and sessile colorectal adenoma measuring 10 to 14 mm were recruited to undergo CS-EMR. The primary outcome was histological complete resection rate by CS-EMR, which was defined as en bloc resection, with a pathologically negative vertical margin and no neoplastic tissue obtained from 4 quadrants of the mucosal defect margin. Secondary outcomes were en bloc resection rate by CS-EMR, failure rate of CS-EMR, and the incidence of adverse events. A total of 80 polyps from 72 patients were included. CS-EMR failed in 11 lesions (13.7%), all of which were resected using a high-frequency electric current. The rates of en bloc resection and histologic complete resection by CS-EMR were 82.5% (66 of 80) and 63.8% (51 of 80), respectively. No bleeding occurred during the CS-EMR procedure, and there was no delayed bleeding or perforation at the site where CS-EMR was performed. CS-EMR can be safely performed in an en bloc fashion for some colorectal adenomas measuring 10 to 14 mm. However, there is room for improvement regarding the resectability and evaluation of the vertical margin after CS-EMR. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000031248.).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Cold-snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) has been adapted in a piecemeal fashion as a safe and effective procedure for resection of colorectal polyps ≥10 mm. However, few data are available on en bloc CS-EMR for adenomas of 10 to 14 mm. Thus, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CS-EMR for these colorectal adenomas.
METHODS
In this single-arm, prospective, observational study, patients with at least 1 slightly elevated and sessile colorectal adenoma measuring 10 to 14 mm were recruited to undergo CS-EMR. The primary outcome was histological complete resection rate by CS-EMR, which was defined as en bloc resection, with a pathologically negative vertical margin and no neoplastic tissue obtained from 4 quadrants of the mucosal defect margin. Secondary outcomes were en bloc resection rate by CS-EMR, failure rate of CS-EMR, and the incidence of adverse events.
RESULTS
A total of 80 polyps from 72 patients were included. CS-EMR failed in 11 lesions (13.7%), all of which were resected using a high-frequency electric current. The rates of en bloc resection and histologic complete resection by CS-EMR were 82.5% (66 of 80) and 63.8% (51 of 80), respectively. No bleeding occurred during the CS-EMR procedure, and there was no delayed bleeding or perforation at the site where CS-EMR was performed.
CONCLUSIONS
CS-EMR can be safely performed in an en bloc fashion for some colorectal adenomas measuring 10 to 14 mm. However, there is room for improvement regarding the resectability and evaluation of the vertical margin after CS-EMR. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000031248.).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32464143
pii: S0016-5107(20)34314-5
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.019
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1239-1246Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.