A diagnosis-based approach to assess specific risks of river degradation in a multiple pressure context: Insights from fish communities.

Ecological risk assessment Functional trait Hydromorphology Invasive alien species Machine learning Water chemistry

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 14 02 2020
revised: 27 04 2020
accepted: 13 05 2020
pubmed: 30 5 2020
medline: 19 6 2020
entrez: 30 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the context of increasing pressure on water bodies, many fish-based indices have been developed to evaluate the ecological status of rivers. However, most of these indices suffer from several limitations, which hamper the capacity of water managers to select the most appropriate measures of restoration. Those limitations include: (i) being dependent on reference conditions, (ii) not satisfactorily handling complex and non-linear biological responses to pressure gradients, and (iii) being unable to identify specific risks of stream degradation in a multi-pressure context. To tackle those issues, we developed a diagnosis-based approach using Random Forest models to predict the impairment probabilities of river fish communities by 28 pressure categories (chemical, hydromorphological and biological). In addition, the database includes the abundances of 72 fish species collected from 1527 sites in France, sampled between 2005 and 2015; and fish taxonomic and biological information. Twenty random forest models provided at least good performances when evaluating impairment probabilities of fish communities by those pressures. The best performing models indicated that fish communities were impacted, on average, by 7.34 ± 0.03 abiotic pressure categories (mean ± SE), and that hydromorphological alterations (5.27 ± 0.02) were more often detected than chemical ones (2.06 ± 0.02). These models showed that alterations in longitudinal continuity, and contaminations by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons were respectively the most frequent hydromorphological and chemical pressure categories in French rivers. This approach has also efficiently detected the functional impact of invasive alien species. Identifying and ranking the impacts of multiple anthropogenic pressures that trigger functional shifts in river biological communities is essential for managers to prioritize actions and to implement appropriate restoration programmes. Actually implemented in an R package, this approach has the capacity to detect a variety of impairments, resulting in an efficient assessment of ecological risks across various spatial and temporal scales.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32470662
pii: S0048-9697(20)32984-3
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139467
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

139467

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The achievement of this manuscript has not been influenced by competing financial, personal, or professional interests.

Auteurs

Olivier Dézerald (O)

ESE, Ecology and Ecosystems Health, INRAE, Agrocampus Ouest, 35042 Rennes, France; Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LIEC, F-57000 Metz, France. Electronic address: olivier.dezerald@gmail.com.

Cédric P Mondy (CP)

Office Français de la Biodiversité, Direction Régionale Ile-de-France, 12 cours Lumière, F-94300 Vincennes, France.

Samuel Dembski (S)

Office Français de la Biodiversité, Direction Régionale Ile-de-France, 12 cours Lumière, F-94300 Vincennes, France.

Karl Kreutzenberger (K)

Office Français de la Biodiversité, Direction Générale, 35042 Rennes, France.

Yorick Reyjol (Y)

UMS Patrinat (OFB-CNRS-MNHN), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle CP41, 36 rue Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 75005 Paris, France.

André Chandesris (A)

INRAE, UR Riverly, 5 rue de la Doua - CS 20244, 69625 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.

Laurent Valette (L)

INRAE, UR Riverly, 5 rue de la Doua - CS 20244, 69625 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.

Sébastien Brosse (S)

Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174 UPS-CNRS-IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse, France.

Aurèle Toussaint (A)

Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu 51005, Estonia.

Jérôme Belliard (J)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR HYCAR, 92160 Antony, France.

Marie-Line Merg (ML)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR HYCAR, 92160 Antony, France.

Philippe Usseglio-Polatera (P)

Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LIEC, F-57000 Metz, France.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH