Adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon-alfa2b vs observation in stage II B/C patients with ulcerated primary: Results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18081 randomised trial.
Adult
Aged
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Combined Modality Therapy
Drug Administration Schedule
Europe
/ epidemiology
Female
Humans
Injections, Subcutaneous
Interferon alpha-2
/ administration & dosage
Interferon-alpha
/ administration & dosage
Male
Medical Oncology
/ organization & administration
Melanoma
/ complications
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Polyethylene Glycols
/ administration & dosage
Recombinant Proteins
/ administration & dosage
Skin Neoplasms
/ complications
Skin Ulcer
/ complications
Societies, Medical
/ organization & administration
Survival Analysis
Watchful Waiting
/ methods
Adjuvant therapy
Pegylated interferon
Randomized trial
Stage II
Ulcerated melanoma
Journal
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
09
04
2020
accepted:
10
04
2020
pubmed:
30
5
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
30
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Subgroup analyses of two large EORTC adjuvant interferon-alpha2b (IFNα-2b) vs observation randomised trials demonstrated that a treatment benefit was observed only in patients with an ulcerated melanoma without palpable nodes (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence-free survival [RFS] was 0.69). This was confirmed by a meta-analysis of 15 adjuvant IFN trials (HR: 0.79). In the EORTC 18081 trial, sentinel node-negative stage II patients with an ulcerated primary melanoma were 1:1 randomised between pegylated (PEG)-IFNα-2b at 3 μg/kg/week subcutaneously and observation, for 2 years, or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity in spite of dose adjustments to maintain an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Main end-point was RFS. Secondary end-points included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival, and safety (EudraCT Number: 2009-010273-20). Between February 2013 and January 2017, only 112 patients were randomised, 56 in each arm. The trial was stopped early for lack of recruitment. At a 3.4-year median follow-up, the estimated HR for the PEG-IFNα-2b group compared with the observation group regarding RFS was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-1.37), and the 3-year RFS rate was 80.0% (95% CI: 65.7-88.8%) and 72.9% (95% CI: 58.3-83.0%), respectively. DMFS was prolonged: HR: 0.39 (95% CI: 0.15-0.97), and the 3-year DMFS rate was 90.6% (95% CI: 78.9-96.0%) vs 76.4% (95% CI: 62.1-85.9%). One patient in the PEG-IFNα-2b group died compared with 4 in the observation group. Fifty-four patients started PEG-IFNα-2b treatment, 16 (29%) completed 2 years of treatment, 2 (4%) stopped due to recurrence, 23 (43%) due to toxicity and 14 (25%) due to other reasons. The EORTC 18081 PEG-IFNα-2b randomised trial, observed a similar HR (0.69) for RFS as the previous EORTC trials (0.69). In countries without access to new drugs, adjuvant (PEG)-IFNα-2b treatment is an option for patients with ulcerated melanomas without palpable nodes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Subgroup analyses of two large EORTC adjuvant interferon-alpha2b (IFNα-2b) vs observation randomised trials demonstrated that a treatment benefit was observed only in patients with an ulcerated melanoma without palpable nodes (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence-free survival [RFS] was 0.69). This was confirmed by a meta-analysis of 15 adjuvant IFN trials (HR: 0.79).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In the EORTC 18081 trial, sentinel node-negative stage II patients with an ulcerated primary melanoma were 1:1 randomised between pegylated (PEG)-IFNα-2b at 3 μg/kg/week subcutaneously and observation, for 2 years, or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity in spite of dose adjustments to maintain an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Main end-point was RFS. Secondary end-points included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival, and safety (EudraCT Number: 2009-010273-20).
RESULTS
Between February 2013 and January 2017, only 112 patients were randomised, 56 in each arm. The trial was stopped early for lack of recruitment. At a 3.4-year median follow-up, the estimated HR for the PEG-IFNα-2b group compared with the observation group regarding RFS was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-1.37), and the 3-year RFS rate was 80.0% (95% CI: 65.7-88.8%) and 72.9% (95% CI: 58.3-83.0%), respectively. DMFS was prolonged: HR: 0.39 (95% CI: 0.15-0.97), and the 3-year DMFS rate was 90.6% (95% CI: 78.9-96.0%) vs 76.4% (95% CI: 62.1-85.9%). One patient in the PEG-IFNα-2b group died compared with 4 in the observation group. Fifty-four patients started PEG-IFNα-2b treatment, 16 (29%) completed 2 years of treatment, 2 (4%) stopped due to recurrence, 23 (43%) due to toxicity and 14 (25%) due to other reasons.
CONCLUSIONS
The EORTC 18081 PEG-IFNα-2b randomised trial, observed a similar HR (0.69) for RFS as the previous EORTC trials (0.69). In countries without access to new drugs, adjuvant (PEG)-IFNα-2b treatment is an option for patients with ulcerated melanomas without palpable nodes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32470710
pii: S0959-8049(20)30181-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.015
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Interferon alpha-2
0
Interferon-alpha
0
Recombinant Proteins
0
Polyethylene Glycols
3WJQ0SDW1A
peginterferon alfa-2b
G8RGG88B68
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
94-103Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement A.M.M.E. reports receiving personal fees as consultant advisor for Biocad, BioInvent, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), CatalYm, Ellipses, Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK), HalioDX, Incyte, IO Biotech, ISA Pharmaceuticals, Nektar, Merck Sharpe & Dohme (MSD), Novartis, Pfizer, Polynoma, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sellas, SkylineDx. P.R. reports receiving personal fees as consultant advisor for Novartis, MSD, BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Blueprint Medicines and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work. R.H.-W. reports receiving grants and non-financial support from EORTC, during the conduct of the study. C.R. reports personal fees as consultant advisor for Roche, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, MSD, Sanofi, Biothera, Ultimovacs, outside the submitted work. A.v.A. reports receiving grants from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, MSD-Merck, Merck-Pfizer, Sanofi and 4SC, outside the submitted work. L.B. reports receiving personal fees as consultant advisor for BMS, Novartis, MSD, Swedish Orphan, Bayer and Incyte outside the submitted work. A.M. reports receiving personal fees from Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD and SunPharma, outside the submitted work. J.J.G. reports receiving personal fees for advisory role from BMS, Novartis, MSD, Roche, Amgen,Pierre Fabre, Merck, Pfizer and Sanofi, and has also received travel support from BMS, Novartis, MSD, outside the submitted work. D.S. reports receiving grants, personal fees for consulting or advisory role; received honoraria; received travel expenses, accommodations, expenses from MSD, during the conduct of the study; and also received personal fees for consulting or advisory role; honoraria; travel expenses, accommodations, expenses from Roche / Genentech, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Novartis, grants and personal fees from BMS, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck Serono, and Amgen, personal fees from Immunocore, Incyte, 4SC, Pierre Fabre, Mologen, Sanofi / Regeneron, Roche, Sysmex, Agenus, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, InFlarX, Philogen, Nektar, Sandoz, non-financial support from Merck, outside the submitted work. M.M., F.G., E.P., E.M., O.B., S.M., M.K. and S.S. report no competing interests. A.A.E.T. reports receiving travel support from Agenus, outside the submitted work.