Effects of Short-Term Normothermic and Subnormothermic Perfusion After Cold Preservation on Liver Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death.
Journal
Transplantation proceedings
ISSN: 1873-2623
Titre abrégé: Transplant Proc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0243532
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
09
12
2019
accepted:
22
01
2020
pubmed:
31
5
2020
medline:
18
11
2020
entrez:
31
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Liver transplantation from donors after cardiac death (DCD) could increase the pool of organs. We previously reported that oxygenated subnormothermic (20°C-25°C) ex vivo liver perfusion (SELP) improved the graft viability in rats. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of SELP and normothermic (37°C) ex vivo liver perfusion (NELP) after cold storage (CS) in DCD liver grafts. Male Wistar rats were used, and grafts were retrieved 30 minutes after cardiac arrest. We performed oxygenated NELP and SELP with a Krebs-Henseleit buffer for different time points and durations: Group 0, donation performed from heart-beating donors (control); Group 1 (DCD group), donation performed from DCD donors with no treatments; Group 2, NELP performed before CS (30 minutes); Group 3, NELP performed after CS (30 minutes); Group 4, SELP performed after CS (30 minutes); Group 5, SELP performed after CS (60 minutes); and Group 6, SELP performed after CS (90 minutes). After 15 minutes of incubation at room temperature, the grafts were reperfused under normothermic conditions for 60 minutes as a model of liver transplantation. No significant differences in body and liver weight were observed between all groups. In the SELP after CS groups, even 30 minutes of perfusion improved bile production, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-1β significantly compared with the DCD group (P < .05), comparable with NELP groups. SELP rescued DCD livers from ischemia-reperfusion injury the same as the normothermic perfusion before or after CS groups. SELP after CS is more convenient than normothermic perfusion; hence, this technique may increase the organ pool.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Liver transplantation from donors after cardiac death (DCD) could increase the pool of organs. We previously reported that oxygenated subnormothermic (20°C-25°C) ex vivo liver perfusion (SELP) improved the graft viability in rats. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of SELP and normothermic (37°C) ex vivo liver perfusion (NELP) after cold storage (CS) in DCD liver grafts.
METHODS
METHODS
Male Wistar rats were used, and grafts were retrieved 30 minutes after cardiac arrest. We performed oxygenated NELP and SELP with a Krebs-Henseleit buffer for different time points and durations: Group 0, donation performed from heart-beating donors (control); Group 1 (DCD group), donation performed from DCD donors with no treatments; Group 2, NELP performed before CS (30 minutes); Group 3, NELP performed after CS (30 minutes); Group 4, SELP performed after CS (30 minutes); Group 5, SELP performed after CS (60 minutes); and Group 6, SELP performed after CS (90 minutes). After 15 minutes of incubation at room temperature, the grafts were reperfused under normothermic conditions for 60 minutes as a model of liver transplantation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
No significant differences in body and liver weight were observed between all groups. In the SELP after CS groups, even 30 minutes of perfusion improved bile production, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-1β significantly compared with the DCD group (P < .05), comparable with NELP groups.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
SELP rescued DCD livers from ischemia-reperfusion injury the same as the normothermic perfusion before or after CS groups. SELP after CS is more convenient than normothermic perfusion; hence, this technique may increase the organ pool.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32471629
pii: S0041-1345(19)31682-3
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.147
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1639-1642Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.