The Gut Microbial Architecture of Efficiency Traits in the Domestic Poultry Model Species Japanese Quail (
Japanese quail
hologenomic selection
microbiability
quantitative traits
Journal
G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
ISSN: 2160-1836
Titre abrégé: G3 (Bethesda)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566598
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 07 2020
07 07 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
31
5
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
31
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is well known that mammals and avian gut microbiota compositions are shaped by the host genomes and affect quantitative traits. The microbial architecture describes the impact of the microbiota composition on quantitative trait variation and the number and effect distribution of microbiota features. In the present study the gut microbial architecture of feed-related traits phosphorus and calcium utilization, daily gain, feed intake and feed per gain ratio in the domestic poultry model species Japanese quail were assessed by mixed linear models. The ileum microbiota composition was characterized by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing techniques of growing individuals. The microbiability of the traits was on a similar level as the narrow sense heritability and was highly significant except for calcium utilization. The animal microbial correlation of the traits was substantial. Microbiome-wide association analyses revealed several traits associated and highly significant microbiota features, both on the bacteria genera as well as on the operational taxonomic unit level. Most features were significant for more than one trait, which explained the high microbial correlations. It can be concluded that the traits are polymicrobial determined with some microbiota features with larger effects and many with small effects. The results are important for the development of hologenomic selection schemes for feed-related traits in avian breeding programs that are targeting the host genome and the metagenome simultaneously.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32471941
pii: g3.120.401424
doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401424
pmc: PMC7341145
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2553-2562Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Vollmar et al.
Références
J Anim Breed Genet. 2020 Jan;137(1):4-13
pubmed: 31576623
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D643-8
pubmed: 24293649
J Anim Breed Genet. 2020 Jan;137(1):84-102
pubmed: 31762123
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001;95(1-2):103-9
pubmed: 11978979
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 May;100(9):4201-9
pubmed: 26758298
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005 Sep;29(4):813-35
pubmed: 16102604
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
Gigascience. 2012 Jul 12;1(1):7
pubmed: 23587224
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 17;9(6):e99826
pubmed: 24937705
J Appl Microbiol. 1998 Jun;84(6):1163-70
pubmed: 9717303
PLoS Genet. 2016 Feb 18;12(2):e1005846
pubmed: 26891056
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):6574
pubmed: 31024050
J Vet Sci. 2019 May;20(3):e26
pubmed: 31161744
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0164735
pubmed: 27760159
Poult Sci. 2016 Apr;95(4):764-73
pubmed: 26740136
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Jun 20;51(1):28
pubmed: 31221101
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Dec;96(5):1361-9
pubmed: 22249719
Front Microbiol. 2016 Dec 19;7:2033
pubmed: 28066358
Genetics. 2017 Jul;206(3):1637-1644
pubmed: 28468904
Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 15;8:1555
pubmed: 28861066
Anim Genet. 2004 Jun;35(3):195-200
pubmed: 15147390
J Anim Breed Genet. 2020 Jan;137(1):23-35
pubmed: 31531910
BMC Genomics. 2017 Mar 14;18(Suppl 2):114
pubmed: 28361695
Nature. 2016 Jul 06;535(7610):94-103
pubmed: 27383984
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2019 Sep 20;5:24
pubmed: 31552140
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 07;9(3):e89862
pubmed: 24608294
Animals (Basel). 2020 May 19;10(5):
pubmed: 32438715
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 14;8(1):4536
pubmed: 29540768
Nat Genet. 2011 Jun;43(6):519-25
pubmed: 21552263
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0119770
pubmed: 25781608
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D457-62
pubmed: 26476454
PLoS Genet. 2018 Oct 12;14(10):e1007580
pubmed: 30312316
Poult Sci. 2005 Aug;84(8):1252-60
pubmed: 16156209
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 20;10(11):e0143442
pubmed: 26588075
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 5;8(1):2381
pubmed: 29402949
Heliyon. 2020 Jan 16;6(1):e03213
pubmed: 31970305
mSystems. 2019 May 7;4(3):
pubmed: 31219789
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 30;7:17
pubmed: 32083101
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1997 May;21(3):261-81
pubmed: 9168263
Anim Health Res Rev. 2012 Jun;13(1):89-99
pubmed: 22853945
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Jan;59(1):147-57
pubmed: 17233749
PeerJ. 2013 Dec 23;1:e237
pubmed: 24432198
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2015 Jun;99(3):418-23
pubmed: 25266875
J Anim Breed Genet. 2020 Jan;137(1):14-22
pubmed: 31701578
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9440-5
pubmed: 12883005
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Aug;74(16):5254-8
pubmed: 18586965
J Anim Breed Genet. 2019 Mar;136(2):75-76
pubmed: 30773714
Front Microbiol. 2015 Oct 07;6:1092
pubmed: 26500632
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1982;34(1-2):136-48
pubmed: 7151485
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0192450
pubmed: 29444134
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 May 31;84(12):
pubmed: 29625981